Skip to main content

1-20 of 34 results for subject:Monarchy

Session X
2013-14

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Political and Constitutional Reform Committee
Date
20 March 2014
Reference
HC 784 2013-14
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty’s Government when the Succession to the Crown Act 2013 will be brought into effect.

Asked by
Lord Lexden (Conservative)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
26 February 2014
Reference
752 cc921-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Succession to the Crown Act will be commenced when each Commonwealth realm has taken all steps necessary to give the changes effect in its jurisdiction.

Answered by
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 February 2014
Reference
752 c921
House
House of Lords

I thank my noble and learned friend, who is the master of the intricacies of this legislation. Can he reaffirm that it is absolutely essential that this modernising constitutional change is implemented—and implemented fully—in all 16 realms of which Her Majesty is head of state to ensure that the Crown descends in exactly the same way in all of them. Does my noble friend have any reason to anticipate that any of the realms might ultimately default on their obligations under the Perth agreement?

Asked by
Lord Lexden (Conservative)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
26 February 2014
Reference
752 c922
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I entirely agree with my noble friend that it is important that all 16 realms agree. Indeed, the intention is that when they all have put in place the necessary legislation there will be a simultaneous order to give effect in each of the realms. I make it clear that all realms that took the view that legislation is required have passed the requisite legislation, with the exception of Australia. As I informed your Lordships’ House at Third Reading, the Council of Australian Governments agreed that respective states would legislate first, requesting that the Commonwealth legislation be brought forward by the Canberra Government. To date, three states have enacted legislation; two have introduced legislation; and South Australia has yet to introduce legislation because it is in the middle of an election campaign.

Answered by
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 February 2014
Reference
752 c922
House
House of Lords

My Lords, although the new succession arrangements are to be welcomed, does the Minister not believe that it is wholly inconsistent not to similarly reform all hereditary titles so they are gender equal?

Asked by
Earl of Clancarty (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
26 February 2014
Reference
752 c922
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this issue was raised during our debates. It was indicated that numerous issues would arise with regard to hereditary titles which did specifically arise with regard to the succession to the Crown—and indeed I think my noble friend Lord Lucas has a Private Member’s Bill which has had one day in Committee, where there was an opportunity to debate that issue.

Answered by
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 February 2014
Reference
752 c922
House
House of Lords

My Lords, with the birth of Prince George some of the urgency has gone out of the need to implement Section 1 of the Act. Does my noble friend agree that it is still important, and indeed urgent, to bring Section 2 into force to start to implement the dismantling of the discrimination against Roman Catholics that has been embedded in our constitution and therefore in those of Her Majesty’s other realms for well over 300 years?

Asked by
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
26 February 2014
Reference
752 c922
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I entirely agree with my noble friend. He is right to say that the birth of Prince George has taken away the immediacy of that particular matter, but he is also right to point out that the Bill also allows someone in the line of succession to become sovereign to marry a Roman Catholic. It also removes the requirement of the heirs of George II to seek Her Majesty’s approval before they can marry—it will now be confined to first six in line to the throne.

Answered by
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 February 2014
Reference
752 c922
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is for exactly those reasons that the Opposition very much welcomed the Bill. If I understand it, it is only Australia for which we now wait. We just hope that before the Duke and Duchess of Cambridge get to Australia, it may have done the necessary. Although their first born is a son, were they to have a brace that come further, the order of succession may still be important for those subsequent children. Can the noble Lord perhaps use his good endeavours to see this speedily enacted?

Asked by
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
26 February 2014
Reference
752 c923
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is fair to say that all the state premiers in Australia have indicated their support for this measure, and that the Commonwealth Government of Australia stand ready to put in place the necessary legislation once each of the states has enacted its legislation.

Answered by
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 February 2014
Reference
752 c923
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does the Minister agree that this Bill, which was always a sensitive measure, becomes more sensitive with every day that passes without agreement? When the Bill passed through this House it was emphasised to us that the Bill was urgent and unamendable because all the other realms had agreed to all the principles underlying it—all the more reason, therefore, to urge my noble friend to ensure that representations are made to ensure the speediest outcome in those realms that have not yet completed the process.

Asked by
Lord Lang of Monkton (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
26 February 2014
Reference
752 c923
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as I indicated, there is only one realm that has still to legislate. Some realms took the view that, under their own laws, legislation was not required. I have indicated the position in Australia and have no reason to believe that anything other than good endeavours are being used to get the necessary legislation in place.

Answered by
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
26 February 2014
Reference
752 c923
House
House of Lords
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Political and Constitutional Reform Committee
Date
6 February 2014
Reference
HC 802 2013-14
House
House of Commons

My Lords, this is the second of two Private Members’ Bills we have had in this Session which attempt to “tidy up”, as the noble Lord, Lord Berkeley, said, our history. I have mixed views on this. The noble Lord himself holds a feudal title which is old enough to...

Member
Lord Wallace of Saltaire (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2013
Reference
749 cc452-4
House
House of Lords

My noble friend Lord Forsyth, not for the first time, puts his finger on a number of interesting issues upon which the noble Lord, Lord Berkeley, might reflect. When he is contemplating the illustrious past of his family, and its contribution to the Kit-Cat Club, the portraits of whose members...

Member
Lord Cormack (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2013
Reference
749 cc449-450
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very proud to be a resident of Cornwall. I represented Cornwall, together with the Isles of Scilly—which are mainly a Duchy possession and are very proud to be separate from Cornwall—in the European Parliament and was a member of the unitary authority for Cornwall when it...

Member
Lord Teverson (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2013
Reference
749 cc450-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we owe my noble friend Lord Berkeley a vote of thanks for raising an issue of this nature. It has not been an easy debate for him to launch, but he has struggled on with it. As he said, he has been following these issues for some years....

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2013
Reference
749 cc451-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very grateful for the Minister’s statement, which means that I can now proceed.

Before I get into the substance of the Bill, noble Lords might be interested to hear that I found out recently that an ancestor of mine, the third Earl of Berkeley, who was later...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2013
Reference
749 cc443-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have it in command from Her Majesty the Queen and His Royal Highness the Prince of Wales to acquaint the House that they, having been informed of the purport of the Rights of the Sovereign and the Duchy of Cornwall Bill [HL], have consented to place their...

Member
Lord Wallace of Saltaire (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 November 2013
Reference
749 c443
House
House of Lords