Skip to main content

1-15 of 15 results for subject:Picketing

Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

It is a pleasure to speak under your chairmanship, Mr Caton.

I do not intend to rehearse the issues raised during a debate on 23 January 2014, because I think that all hon. Members in this Chamber attended it. However, I shall say that the will of Parliament is being defied...

Member
David Anderson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2015
Reference
594 cc463-6WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate my hon. Friend on securing this very timely debate. Does he agree that the only crime that these men committed was to fight for better health and safety on the building sites? During that time, 571 people had been killed in a three-year period and 221,000 people had...

Member
Ian Lavery (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2015
Reference
594 c466WH
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for his intervention. Like me, he worked in the mining industry, which saw some of the most horrific accident and death statistics going back centuries. We fought against that and turned it around in the mining industry. The people in the building industry were trying...

Member
David Anderson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2015
Reference
594 c466WH
House
House of Commons

May I ask the Minister a question through my hon. Friend? Why is it that the Government are reducing the 30-year rule to 20 years, yet in correspondence on this matter with me the Ministry of Justice has increased the information release date from 30 years to 40 years? My...

Member
Lord Hanson of Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2015
Reference
594 c466WH
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend asks a very valid question, and I hope that we get an answer from the Minister. It beggars belief. We know the context in which this case took place. We had industrial strife in a number of industries and obviously a lot was happening in Northern...

Member
David Anderson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2015
Reference
594 c466WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate my hon. Friend on securing this debate. He has assiduously pursued this issue since he came

into Parliament. One way in which the trade unions were undermined in the ’60s and ’70s, certainly in the building industry, was through something called lump labour, which kept wages down. Sometimes...

Member
Jim Cunningham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2015
Reference
594 c466WH
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for reminding us of that, because what the building employers were doing was not only bad in terms of people’s working conditions; they were actually breaking the law. They were encouraging people not to be paid properly. In effect, those employers were not paying income...

Member
David Anderson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2015
Reference
594 c467WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Caton.

I pay tribute to the hon. Member for Blaydon (Mr Anderson); he knows that I respect hugely his commitment to this issue. I will not repeat myself, but he also knows from the large debate that we had on the...

Member
Simon Hughes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2015
Reference
594 cc467-9WH
House
House of Commons

That is the intent of my question to the Cabinet Office, which is down for tomorrow, but I am on my feet to ask a different question. Does the Minister not find it strange that despite what was said in last year’s debate and what I have said today, and...

Member
David Anderson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2015
Reference
594 c469WH
House
House of Commons

I absolutely understand the hon. Gentleman’s drawing that conclusion. To be fair—trying to step back for a second—the fact that nothing has been said can be open to interpretation in either direction, but I completely understand the view that if there were nothing to hide, someone might have said that....

Member
Simon Hughes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2015
Reference
594 cc469-470WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend the Member for Blaydon (Mr Anderson) commented that the Minister was a respected person. I have no doubt that that is the case. Will the Minister tell us what powers he has to progress the matter? He has been in his position for quite some time now...

Member
Ian Lavery (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2015
Reference
594 c470WH
House
House of Commons

Within my powers as a Minister in the Ministry of Justice I have done all that I can do. I do not have the power to direct other Departments to release documents for which they have the responsibility. The process is: application to the Department, which the researcher of the...

Member
Simon Hughes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2015
Reference
594 c470WH
House
House of Commons

I understand all that. The question is, what powers does the Minister have and what powers has he used since becoming a Minister to progress matters in his own Department?

Member
Ian Lavery (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2015
Reference
594 c470WH
House
House of Commons

We do not hold any of the documents in my Department. The reason that I was responding to the debate is in part because I am the Minister with responsibility for freedom of information. I have ensured that the hon. Gentleman and the hon. Member for Blaydon know exactly how...

Member
Simon Hughes (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2015
Reference
594 cc470-1WH
House
House of Commons
Lead member
David Anderson
Answering member
Simon Hughes
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
24 March 2015
Reference
594 cc462-471WH
House
House of Commons