Skip to main content

1-20 of 39 results for subject:Software

Session X
2014-15

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Health, when he expects his Department's planned mental health app to be available across the NHS.

Asked by
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Answering body
Department of Health
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 March 2015
Reference
228010
House
House of Commons

Body Image Altering Software

I rise to present a petition on behalf of pupils at Dame Allan’s school in Newcastle. The petition was organised by pupils at the school who feel that the use of Photoshop and similar image software to alter photos of people in magazines, newspapers and the internet...

Lead member
Chi Onwurah
Type
Paper petitions
Date
20 March 2015
Reference
594 c1088
House
House of Commons

To ask the hon. Member for South West Devon, representing the Speaker's Committee on the Electoral Commission, when the Electoral Commission first knew of the problems with the registration software used by Electoral Registration Officers; and what steps the Commission has taken to overcome those problems.

Asked by
Chris Ruane (Labour)
Answering body
Speaker's Committee on the Electoral Commission
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 March 2015
Reference
225183
House
House of Commons

To ask Mr Chancellor of the Exchequer, if he will make an assessment of the effect of COS14 VAT rules on public sector procurement of off the shelf software services.

Asked by
Chi Onwurah (Labour)
Answering body
HM Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 February 2015
Reference
222663
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the electoral registration app for smart phones recently launched in Dundee; and what plans they have to encourage the use of smart phone technology to facilitate voter registration, particularly amongst young people.

Asked by
Lord Storey (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 February 2015
Reference
HL4356
House
House of Lords

To ask the Chairman of Committees how much it cost to procure the latest Microsoft Outlook system for use in Parliament; whether the system is working to specification; and what is being done about any problems encountered so far.

Asked by
Lord McAvoy (Labour)
Answering body
The Lord Chairman of Committees
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
3 February 2015
Reference
HL4317
House
House of Lords

Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
George Eustice
Answering member
Angela C Smith
Department
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
Ninth Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
29 January 2015
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, what progress he has made on promoting Level 3 Building Information Modelling; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
Chi Onwurah (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 January 2015
Reference
218904
House
House of Commons

My Lords, Amendment 16 stands in my name and in the name of my noble friend Lady Hayter of Kentish Town. Digital sales are booming and the digital music, video and games market now accounts for 43% of the total UK entertainment sector. Recent research puts the UK as the...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2014
Reference
757 cc506-7
House
House of Lords

Logically, one thing follows another. That is exactly the purpose of this amendment. Indeed, I shall refer again to the speech made by the noble Baroness, Lady King, on 20 October, as recorded at column 183 of Hansard. It has been extraordinarily helpful in formulating the terms of this amendment.

Let...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2014
Reference
757 cc510-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this amendment reflects the dynamic nature of digital content. We all recognise that digital content changes to some extent over time when we receive updates to our software and apps. I listened carefully to the concerns raised in Committee by the noble Lord, Lord Haskel, and my noble...

Member
Baroness Jolly (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2014
Reference
757 cc513-5
House
House of Lords

During the debate on digital content that we had in Committee, I noted a number of concerns raised by my noble friend Lord Clement-Jones, who is not in his place, about the complex environment in which digital content works and the difficulty for the industry in ensuring that its digital...

Member
Baroness Jolly (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 November 2014
Reference
757 cc516-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Clause 33 sets out which contracts to supply digital content are covered by this chapter. It clarifies that the chapter will apply to contracts between a trader and a consumer where a trader agrees to supply digital content that has been paid for with money; associated with any...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2014
Reference
756 cc173-4GC
House
House of Lords

Your Lordships will be glad to know that this is my third of three amendments, and then I will have a rest and noble Lords will have a rest from me. Then again, you may not wish to know that the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, will follow; with his detailed...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2014
Reference
756 cc176-8GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I beg to move Amendment 34 and speak to Amendments 36, 37 and 38. Clause 34 specifies that digital content is,

“to be of satisfactory quality”,

and requires that digital content must be free from “minor defects”. I very much accept, unlike the noble Lord, Lord Stevenson, that there is...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2014
Reference
756 cc180-2GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am very pleased to have the support of the noble Lord, Lord Sugar, for Amendment 34A. I do not know whether he is going to make a personal appearance today, which would excite us all, but let us see. I see that his name is on other...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2014
Reference
756 c188GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in moving Amendment 43 I shall speak also to Amendment 44. Very significantly, the effect of Clause 47 is that liability under most of the provisions of Chapter 3 cannot be excluded or restricted. Broadly, the clause in its present form prohibits any exclusion or restriction of liability...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 October 2014
Reference
756 cc210-1GC
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether companies providing sound effects, graphics and language translation services for use in the creation of gambling products require a licence.

Asked by
Lord Mancroft (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Culture Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 September 2014
Reference
HL1821
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government why, in the light of the Gambling Commission’s guidance, a software developer owning intellectual property in gambling software requires a licence if it amends the software, whereas a gambling operator owning the intellectual property in gambling software which sub-contracts the amendment of that software to...

Asked by
Lord Mancroft (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Culture Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 September 2014
Reference
HL1823
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty’s Government why intellectual property relating to gambling software, often owned by separate companies which in turn license that software, rather than by the direct software developers or gambling operators, remains a determinant of a gambling licence requirement.

Asked by
Lord Mancroft (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Culture Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 September 2014
Reference
HL1822
House
House of Lords