Skip to main content

1-20 of 141 results for subject:Surveillance

Session X
2014-15

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Laid by
Secretary Jeremy Hunt
Department
Department of Health
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
27 March 2015
Reference
SI 2015/937
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

Urgent question on whether the public inquiry into undercover policing will examine files held by the special branch on Members of Parliament.

Lead member
Lord Hain
Answering member
Mike Penning
Department
Home Office
Type
Urgent questions
Date
26 March 2015
Reference
594 cc1580-1592
House
House of Commons

Lords statement on whether the public inquiry into undercover policing will examine files held by the special branch on Members of Parliament.

Lead member
Lord Bates
Department
Home Office
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
26 March 2015
Reference
760 cc1559-1561
House
House of Lords

(Urgent Question): To ask the Secretary of State for Home Affairs if she will make a statement on whether the public inquiry into undercover policing will examine files held by the special branch on Members of Parliament.

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2015
Reference
594 c1581
House
House of Commons

Undercover policing is an essential tactic in fighting crime. However, we have known for some time that there have been serious historical failings in undercover policing and its practices. To improve the public’s confidence in undercover work, we must ensure that there is no repeat of these failings. That is...

Member
Mike Penning (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2015
Reference
594 c1581
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for his statement. Will he pass on to the Home Secretary my request that she ensure that the remit of the public inquiry she has announced into the operations of the special demonstration squad includes the surveillance of the MPs publicly named by Peter Francis when...

Member
Lord Hain (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2015
Reference
594 cc1581-2
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman has put his point to the House very well. It is important that the country has confidence in the way the police operate, and that is exactly why the Home Secretary has instigated the inquiry. I am sure that Lord Justice Pitchford and his officials will...

Member
Mike Penning (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2015
Reference
594 c1582
House
House of Commons

In the past year there have been a number of revelations about the police improperly hacking into journalists’ telephone calls, and improperly breaching the legal privilege of suspects and using the information they obtain from doing so. The Government have been very coy about responding to my requests about the...

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2015
Reference
594 c1582
House
House of Commons

Let me say to my right hon. Friend that I have never been coy; it is an attribute that I do not really have. On the Wilson doctrine, it is plainly obvious why we have to be careful. There is litigation in place, and we need to make sure that...

Member
Mike Penning (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2015
Reference
594 c1582
House
House of Commons

The allegations in the newspapers today will send a chill up the spine of all those who value free speech, democracy and campaigning for one’s beliefs. Being investigated not for crime but for political beliefs is quite obviously unacceptable.

Almost five years ago, before the last general election, the activities of...

Member
Jack Dromey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2015
Reference
594 cc1582-3
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for his comments and questions, and I think the whole House shares his concerns, but it is for Lord Pitchford to decide how he wants to take this forward. That is exactly why the concerns touched on—

Member
Mike Penning (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2015
Reference
594 c1583
House
House of Commons

What is the view of the Government?

Member
Jack Dromey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2015
Reference
594 c1583
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is better than that. This is a really serious inquiry. There have been concerns for many years, including when his own party was in government, but it is this Government who have established an inquiry as a result of the work of Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary....

Member
Mike Penning (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2015
Reference
594 c1583
House
House of Commons

Forty years ago, when I was president of a students union, I was visited by officers from King’s Cross special branch, whose express purpose was to tell me that they had a file on me. Like the right hon. Member for Neath (Mr Hain), I do not take that desperately...

Member
David Heath (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2015
Reference
594 c1583
House
House of Commons

I think that is exactly the approach that Lord Pitchford will take. If Speaker’s Counsel and the Clerks have concerns, they will certainly submit them, and, if they are asked, there will be full communication between them.

Member
Mike Penning (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2015
Reference
594 c1584
House
House of Commons

This is more important than just feeding our views to an inquiry; the question is what the Minister decides. I want him to assure me that the Government will let me see a full copy of my file. In the 1970s and ’80s, when I was at Brent law centre...

Member
Baroness Harman (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2015
Reference
594 c1584
House
House of Commons

I would love to give the right hon. and learned Lady that assurance from the Dispatch Box, but I cannot. [Interruption.] There is no point trying to shout down a Minister. Ultimately, there may be reasons for that. I was a counter-terrorism Minister in Northern Ireland, where there had to...

Member
Mike Penning (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2015
Reference
594 c1584
House
House of Commons

I have two questions for my right hon. Friend. My preliminary question is: will he, the Leader of the House or someone else tell us before I leave this place what has happened to the concept of Privy Counsellors exchanging information on Privy Council terms? Secondly, does my right hon....

Member
Tony Baldry (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2015
Reference
594 c1584
House
House of Commons

On the latter point, that option remains open, but it is for others to decide. We have changed the law so that officers who have left or resigned during an investigation can be brought back. As far as I am concerned as a Privy Counsellor, Privy Council undertakings are intact...

Member
Mike Penning (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2015
Reference
594 c1584
House
House of Commons

All I would like to say to the Minister is that he must have been a busy man to follow me to 5,000 industrial meetings in the last 30-odd years. I went to Grunwick, I did three pit strikes,

I went to Wapping—I was all over the place. When I...

Member
Dennis Skinner (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 March 2015
Reference
594 c1584
House
House of Commons