Skip to main content

1-20 of 873 results for subject:Campaigns

Session X
2015-16

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I am fantastically grateful to you, Mr Speaker. I heard the Prime Minister on two occasions this afternoon congratulate the new Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan, and I would like to repeat those congratulations myself. The Prime Minister did not, however, apologise for the disgraceful racist campaign the Conservative party chose to run in that election. Will he take the opportunity to apologise for deliberately dividing communities in order to win cheap votes?

Asked by
Tim Farron (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 May 2016
Reference
609 c628
House
House of Commons

It is a great way to end the Session—getting a lesson in clean campaigning from the Liberal Democrats.

Answered by
Lord Cameron of Chipping Norton (Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 May 2016
Reference
609 c628
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House has considered e-petition 116762 relating to the Government’s EU referendum leaflet.

The petition, which remains topical, had 219,535 signatures a few hours ago .

Member
Paul Scully (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c185WH
House
House of Commons

The figure is now 219,553 and rising.

Member
Julian Lewis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c185WH
House
House of Commons

I thank my right hon. Friend for bringing to my attention the extra 20 people who have been galvanised by the thought of this afternoon’s debate. I want to read into Hansard the whole prayer of the petition, headed “STOP CAMERON spending British taxpayers’ money on Pro-EU Referendum leaflets”:

“Prime Minister...

Member
Paul Scully (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c185WH
House
House of Commons

Does the hon. Gentleman agree that the Prime Minister could have learned something from Harold Wilson? Not only did he give a free vote, but the information that was circulated made both cases equally.

Member
Baroness Stuart of Edgbaston (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c185WH
House
House of Commons

I absolutely agree with the right hon. Lady. As Members will see as I develop my argument, it is important that we have a fair and level playing field for the important decision that we have to make on 23 June.

When an e-petition reaches 10,000 signatures, the Government must issue...

Member
Paul Scully (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c185WH
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend hope, as I do, that it gets there before we disappear into a war?

Member
Richard Drax (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c186WH
House
House of Commons

What can I say to that? I thank my hon. Friend.

The total cost of the leaflet and the website and marketing that go with it is £9.3 million of taxpayers’ money. On top of that, the Treasury is publishing documents and the Government continue to have propaganda at the top...

Member
Paul Scully (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c186WH
House
House of Commons

I actually asked what the budget was for the entire campaign that the Government are conducting, and I was told that it was absorbed within other costs. That surely cannot be the case, and it certainly was not announced in the Budget.

Member
Anne Main (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c186WH
House
House of Commons

What worries me most about that answer is that the Treasury is projecting figures to 2030, but it cannot answer questions about Budgets now. That is of concern to me. Some colleagues have encouraged voters to return their leaflets to No. 10, but since that would mean even more cost...

Member
Paul Scully (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c186WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is making an excellent introduction to the debate. Four hundred and seventy-six of my constituents were so outraged that they signed the petition. Is not the main point that the publication of the leaflet goes against the very British sense of fair play? We want a level...

Member
Philip Hollobone (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c186WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is right, and I am glad that Mr Isaby said exactly that. It is important that people in the public eye who have the ear of the press have expressed that opinion.

Member
Paul Scully (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c186WH
House
House of Commons

The TaxPayers Alliance is neutral in the debate. It is important to bear in mind the fact that it issued a statement only because of the waste of taxpayers’ money; it is not taking a side in the referendum itself.

Member
David Nuttall (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c186WH
House
House of Commons

Absolutely. As many such organisations find, its members are split either way, so it is right for it to take a neutral view on the main question. That does not mean that it cannot be concerned about the £9.3 million which, as Jonathan Isaby says, is

“not ‘government money’, it is...

Member
Paul Scully (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c186WH
House
House of Commons

Of course, my hon. Friend knows that that is happening in pursuance of a legal duty introduced into the House of Lords, which became part of our legislation through ping-pong. Is he also aware that I tabled an amendment calling for accuracy and impartiality in that information, which the Minister...

Member
William Cash (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c187WH
House
House of Commons

I am sure that the Minister has heard that, and I hope that he will respond in full to the debate.

Katie Ghose of the Electoral Reform Society expressed similar concerns, and after the referendum on Scottish independence the Electoral Commission warned the Government over taxpayer-funded propaganda, saying that it could...

Member
Paul Scully (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c187WH
House
House of Commons

Is this not a terribly easy case? No previous Labour or Conservative Government have ever thought they should spend taxpayers’ money on promoting Government policies ahead of a general election in the hope of getting a better result. Is that not exactly what the leaflet is doing, and is it...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c187WH
House
House of Commons

Absolutely. The Government are taking many difficult decisions across the five years of this Parliament, but we do not need to write in full to every household to explain why we are doing it. That is why the media and websites are there, and that is what Parliament is there...

Member
Paul Scully (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c187WH
House
House of Commons

Since my hon. Friend mentions the content of the leaflet, does he find it strange that there is no mention in it of the existential risk of war and genocide? Does he think that is because a) the Government had not recognised that the risk existed, b) they recognised it...

Member
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c187WH
House
House of Commons