Skip to main content

1-20 of 6,995 results for subject:Devolution

Session X
2015-16

Type

-
Early day motions (3)
+ Legislation (7) + Bills (7) + Public bills (7)
-
Government bills (2)
+ Private members' bills (5)
-
Presentation bills (1)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (1)
-
Ten minute rule bills (3)
+ Members' contributions (6,589)
-
Business questions (28)
-
Maiden speeches (27)
-
Oral answers to questions (173)
-
Oral question time interventions (12)
+ Oral questions (176)
-
Prime Minister's questions (18)
-
Topical questions (11)
-
Points of order (3)
-
Proceeding contributions (6,228)
+ Parliamentary committees (96) + Committee proceedings (71)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (5)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (14)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (12)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (39)
-
Select Committee reports (15)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (5)
-
Select Committee written evidence (15)
+ Parliamentary papers (49)
-
Annual reports (1)
-
Command papers (3)
-
House of Commons papers (33)
-
House of Lords papers (11)
-
Unprinted papers (2)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (158) + Debates (123)
-
Adjournment debates (1)
-
Backbench debates (2)
+ Committee proceedings (71)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (5)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (14)
-
Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (12)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (39)
-
Debates on select committee reports (1)
-
Emergency debates (1)
+ Legislative debates (55)
-
Debates on bills (55)
+ Monarch's speech debates (3)
-
Queen's speech debates (3)
-
Opposition days (1)
-
Questions for short debate (3)
-
Private notice questions (1)
+ Statements (34) + Oral statements (14)
-
Ministerial statements (13)
-
Select Committee statements (1)
-
Written statements (20)
+ Parliamentary questions (412)
-
Business questions (28)
+ Oral questions (176)
-
Prime Minister's questions (18)
-
Topical questions (11)
-
Private notice questions (1)
-
Written questions (207)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, what assessment he has made of the benefit to local economies of Devolution Deals.

Asked by
Julian Knight (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
11 May 2016
Reference
26654
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Lords papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Constitution Committee
Date
11 May 2016
Reference
HL 149 2015-16
House
House of Lords

Q11

.

Chris Law (Dundee West) (SNP):

Will the Prime Minister give me a personal commitment to work with the Scottish Government to deliver funding for a Tay city deal for Dundee and the surrounding area?

Asked by
Chris Law (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 May 2016
Reference
609 cc624-5
House
House of Commons

I am very happy to give that commitment. I think city deals are working. They are working in Scotland, and I was very proud to be there with the Aberdeen city deal. I make the point that, obviously, city deals between the Scottish Government, the UK Government and the city concerned can only work if we are all part of one happy United Kingdom.

Answered by
Lord Cameron of Chipping Norton (Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 May 2016
Reference
609 c624
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Secretary Nicky Morgan
Department
Department for Education
Type
Unprinted papers
Date
10 May 2016
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, for what reasons only one hon. Member for a Warrington constituency was invited to his recent meeting with the leader of Warrington Borough Council on devolution; who made the decision to invite only one such hon. Member to that...

Asked by
Helen Jones (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Communities and Local Government
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
36419
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House notes with concern the Business, Innovation and Skills Department's proposal to close its Sheffield policy office, moving 247 posts to London; further notes that the Sheffield BIS office proposal runs counter to the Government's welcome commitment to create a public sector that reflects the...

Member
Paul Blomfield (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c415
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is making the central point of our argument. I would like to make the point that it is not just jobs in Sheffield that are at stake. Although the numbers are smaller, jobs in Darlington are being moved to London, too, which makes absolutely no sense.

Member
Baroness Chapman of Darlington (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c415
House
House of Commons

I very much share my hon. Friend’s sentiment that there are many benefits derived from locating jobs outside London. These include cost benefits and the enrichment of decision-making by involving people located around the country in administering government and advising the Government. My hon. Friend made a very important point.

When...

Member
Paul Blomfield (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 cc415-6
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is making an excellent financial case to show why this change should not happen. The BIS office at Billingham in my constituency is not a headquarters, but it lies three miles from the constituency of the Minister responsible for the northern powerhouse. What kind of message does...

Member
Alex Cunningham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c416
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes a very important point, and he will not be surprised to learn that I shall come back to the point a little later in my contribution.

The Government say, quite understandably, that they want to save money, but we have done the maths from the limited information...

Member
Paul Blomfield (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 cc416-7
House
House of Commons

Many of my constituents work for the Insolvency Service. At a time when there is a steel crisis, BHS has collapsed and other businesses are becoming insolvent, one would think that the Government would want to retain staff with expertise in insolvency, yet 153 jobs are at risk. Does my...

Member
Jo Stevens (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c417
House
House of Commons

I do indeed, and I think that other Departments are recognising that problem. For example, the Department for Education is trying to take some of the Sheffield-based BIS staff into its headcount because it is so worried about the loss of institutional expertise in respect of the programmes and the...

Member
Paul Blomfield (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c418
House
House of Commons

I congratulate my hon. Friend on securing the debate. As he will know, not only has the Department for Education made it clear that it does not think it is for the good of education policy to move all staff to London, but it shares a building with BIS staff....

Member
Caroline Flint (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c418
House
House of Commons

I thank my right hon. Friend for her question, and for her robust questioning of the permanent secretary at the Public Accounts Committee. She is absolutely right to say that this sends out the wrong message. When we raised this matter with the permanent secretary, he pointed out that there...

Member
Paul Blomfield (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c418
House
House of Commons

I am really interested in this idea of policy people having to be at the centre. The Department argues that the move will bring BIS policy operations closer to Ministers and contribute to the huge saving of £350 million of running costs. However, the “Government’s Estate Strategy” states:

“With modern IT,...

Member
Alex Cunningham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c418
House
House of Commons

I do indeed. I would simply reflect that this is the Department responsible for innovation. It is supposed to lead on creative thinking and thinking outside the box.

I worry, as do colleagues, that proper consideration has not been given to better options. The Department set itself an ambitious cost-saving strategy...

Member
Paul Blomfield (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 cc418-9
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is making an excellent speech. Should not part of the process he has just outlined involve proper consultation with the relevant trade unions?

Member
Chris Stephens (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c419
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman makes an important point. We saw a process of consultation, which concluded on 2 May. The trade unions, working with the affected staff, have put in some substantial submissions and alternative proposals, and I shall be seeking reassurances from the Minister that they will be properly considered...

Member
Paul Blomfield (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c419
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend agree with me, a London MP, that centralisation and the relocating of staff presents a problem for London? It leads to congestion, more overheating, incredibly expensive accommodation, and so on. Most graduates cannot afford to rent in London, let alone buy their own property.

Member
Ruth Cadbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c419
House
House of Commons