Skip to main content

1-16 of 16 results for subject:Intimidation

Session X
2015-16

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Laid by
Mark Lancaster
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Statutory instruments
Notes
Supplementary Explanatory Memorandum laid 29 October (UC 40 2015-16)
Date
23 October 2015
Reference
SI 2015/1813
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

What steps he plans to take to protect child witnesses in sex abuse and other cases from intimidation during cross-examination.

Asked by
David Mowat (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
15 October 2015
Reference
901580; 600 cc471-2
House
House of Commons

The defence case has to be put to all prosecution witnesses, but in order to ensure effective cross-examination, a mandatory advocacy course for all defence advocates is being developed and will include the cross-examination of vulnerable witnesses. Pre-recorded cross-examination has already been piloted successfully, and we are committed to a national roll-out.

Answered by
Robert Buckland (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 October 2015
Reference
600 c471
House
House of Commons

In 2011, at Stafford Crown court, a victim of child abuse was cross-examined in a vicious and intimidatory way for 12 days by a team of seven barristers, during a session in which the judge was generally thought to have lost control of the courtroom. Such cross-examination is a massive disincentive for others to come forward. Four years later, may I ask what steps have been taken to prevent it from happening again?

Asked by
David Mowat (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
15 October 2015
Reference
600 c471
House
House of Commons

I well remember that case. The good news is that in the retrial matters were handled very differently, and the outcome was successful. However, intimidatory cross-examination should not happen. Judges have a duty to ensure that young witnesses are not cross-examined inappropriately. As I have said, a new advocacy course is being developed to ensure that that sort of abuse does not happen again.

Answered by
Robert Buckland (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 October 2015
Reference
600 c471
House
House of Commons

Will the Solicitor General tell us what the CPS is doing to help vulnerable witnesses, such as victims of human trafficking, to give evidence in courts?

Asked by
Mark Menzies (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
15 October 2015
Reference
600 c472
House
House of Commons

Recently, the CPS drew up new guidelines for the care of witnesses in court. Those guidelines are currently being piloted and will be rolled out nationally in the new year. They will go a long way towards supporting witnesses, while avoiding the dangers of coaching witnesses in the giving of evidence, which, of course, would not be desirable.

Answered by
Robert Buckland (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 October 2015
Reference
600 c472
House
House of Commons

In the last few years, it has become clear that a great many young people have been sexually abused over a number of years and are traumatised by that abuse. Can the Solicitor General assure the House that the necessary resources are available so that the young people in all those cases can be looked after?

Asked by
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Answering body
Attorney General
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
15 October 2015
Reference
600 c472
House
House of Commons

I can reassure the hon. Gentleman. As I have said many times before, when it comes to the protection of vulnerable witnesses and complainants in criminal cases, the CPS is always working to improve its processes so that the experience can be as smooth as possible. What we do not want is a repeat, in effect, of the abuse that those people originally suffered when they come to court and give evidence.

Answered by
Robert Buckland (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 October 2015
Reference
600 c472
House
House of Commons

I know that my hon. Friend has a long-standing interest in improving the processes as a result of that case, which helped to revolutionise the way in which the investigatory authorities all work together. There have been a number of other successful investigations in his own police area, which are helping to improve national practice, and there is a much greater understanding across the country of the way in which in which such cases can be effectively prosecuted.

Answered by
Robert Buckland (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 October 2015
Reference
600 c472
House
House of Commons

My Lords, under this order, trials without a jury can take place in Northern Ireland for a further two years from 1 August 2015. Without this order, the current provisions will lapse on 31 July. This is the fourth such extension of these provisions. Noble Lords will understandably want to...

Member
Lord Dunlop (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2015
Reference
764 cc1167-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise briefly, with a heavy heart, to support this approval Motion. I am very grateful to the Minister for the way in which he has explained the context fully and fairly. I would add only one consideration, which is that another destabilising element in the recent situation...

Member
Lord Bew (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2015
Reference
764 cc1169-1170
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome the Minister to his brief. Let me place on the record that we appreciate the efforts that have been made by him in consultation. I echo what the noble Lord, Lord Bew, said—it is with a heavy heart but nevertheless a necessary attitude towards the legislation....

Member
Lord McAvoy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2015
Reference
764 c1170
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lords, Lord Bew and Lord McAvoy, for their support. Non-jury trial is an exceptional system used only in very limited circumstances. There is rightly a presumption for jury trial in all cases. The security situation in Northern Ireland has not significantly improved since the 2013 extension....

Member
Lord Dunlop (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2015
Reference
764 c1170
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to approve. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Dunlop
Answering member
Lord McAvoy
Department
Scotland Office
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
22 July 2015
Reference
764 cc1167-1170
House
House of Lords

Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Ben Wallace
Answering member
Stephen Pound
Department
Northern Ireland Office
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
Third Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
20 July 2015
House
House of Commons