Skip to main content

1-20 of 109 results for subject:Motability

Session X
2015-16

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, pursuant to the Answer of 13 April 2016 to Question 32963, how many people have been allocated personal independence payments with enhanced mobility payments; and how many of those people have been classed as having muscle degenerative diseases or conditions.

Asked by
Alan Brown (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 May 2016
Reference
36150
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, pursuant to the Answer of 13 April 2016 to Question 32963, how many people who have personal independence payments with enhanced mobility payments have initial awards of (a) three years or less and (b) greater than three years before further...

Asked by
Alan Brown (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
10 May 2016
Reference
36149
House
House of Commons

Changes to the walking assessment have led to nearly 14,000 disabled people across the country losing access to their Motability vehicles. That has caused some of my constituents to lose their jobs and their independence. Why is the Secretary of State punishing disabled people in this way?

Asked by
Rushanara Ali (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Topical questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c375
House
House of Commons

Since PIP was introduced 22,000 more people have accessed the Motability scheme, so I do not recognise the hon. Lady’s account.

Answered by
Justin Tomlinson (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
9 May 2016
Reference
609 c375
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Work and Pensions, with reference to the contribution of the Parliamentary Under-Secretary of State of 23 February 2016, Official Report, column 82WH, on the Motability car scheme, whether the ability to walk 20 metres is one of the assessment criteria for enhanced mobility.

Asked by
Alan Brown (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
5 May 2016
Reference
36131
House
House of Commons

My Lords, in moving this Motion I must first declare that I have a Motability car as a result of having higher-rate mobility and disability living allowance. As I am over 65, I will not be reassessed for personal independence payments. That is probably the reason why I am so...

Member
Baroness Thomas of Winchester (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 May 2016
Reference
771 cc1491-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Baroness, Lady Thomas, has made an excellent case and I support it. I should declare as an interest that I have an award of disability living allowance, but it is not an interest that I have to defend because it is a lifetime award; and, since...

Member
Lord Low of Dalston (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 May 2016
Reference
771 cc1492-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I congratulate the noble Baroness, Lady Thomas of Winchester, on securing this debate and on her persistence over this important matter. Under PIP, those who can reliably walk more than 20 metres will no longer qualify for the highest rate of the mobility component. This support is crucial...

Member
Baroness Masham of Ilton (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 May 2016
Reference
771 cc1495-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am delighted that the noble Baroness, Lady Thomas of Winchester, has tabled this debate. I also congratulate her on her persistence. I declare an interest in that I am a recipient of DLA and am eagerly awaiting the call for my PIP reassessment. It will be very...

Member
Baroness Grey-Thompson (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 May 2016
Reference
771 cc1496-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, thank the noble Baroness, Lady Thomas of Winchester, for bringing forward this important Motion for us to debate tonight. Although I am not in receipt of any benefits, I have already hit the problem of the 20-metre distancing, as I have mentioned in Oral Questions before,...

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 May 2016
Reference
771 cc1498-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the noble Baroness, Lady Thomas of Winchester, and thank her for bringing this Motion before the House. I have a simple point to make.

The tick-box approach is rarely the right one. People are individuals and wherever possible should be treated as such. While it is clear...

Member
Bishop of Peterborough (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 May 2016
Reference
771 c1499
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my noble friend Lady Thomas of Winchester has been a tireless advocate for disabled people, using her skills, knowledge and empathy to try to influence government’s attitude to disabled people, their independence and their well-being. However, the 20-metre rule has little to do either with well-being or independence;...

Member
Baroness Doocey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 May 2016
Reference
771 cc1499-1500
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I congratulate the noble Baroness, Lady Thomas, on securing this debate tonight. As others have said, she is tenacious on this issue. I have been on the receiving end of some of that at former times when I was a Minister, so I know it is for real....

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 May 2016
Reference
771 c1500
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Thomas of Winchester, for moving this Motion and for explaining carefully the nature of the problem that we address tonight. I am also grateful to all noble Lords who have spoken, many of whom I have heard address the same issue repeatedly....

Member
Baroness Sherlock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 May 2016
Reference
771 cc1501-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I first assure the noble Baroness and the House that this Government have always been, and continue to be, fully committed to engaging with disabled people and organisations such as Disability Benefits Consortium and Disability Rights UK. I know that the Minister for Disabled People met the noble...

Member
Baroness Altmann (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 May 2016
Reference
771 c1502
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I must disagree with the Minister on that point. I had an assessment, and nobody took any notice of the fact that I had a serious progressive condition. Therefore, my named disability did not count for anything, which is what the Minister just said.

8 pm

Member
Baroness Thomas of Winchester (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 May 2016
Reference
771 cc1502-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I can only assure the House again that the aim of PIP is to make sure that the assessment looks at the individual and their needs, unlike the previous system, where there was no face-to-face assessment and decisions were made without the professional medical advice which we have...

Member
Baroness Altmann (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 May 2016
Reference
771 cc1503-4
House
House of Lords

The Minister is doing a comprehensive job of explaining the background, and that is important. However, will she accept that there is a great deal of frustration within the disabled community? In spite of repeated freedom of information requests to get some of the data and the metrics around the...

Member
Lord Kirkwood of Kirkhope (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 May 2016
Reference
771 c1504
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord for his question. I can assure him from my own experience that it is important that we have any statistics properly verified before they are released as official statistics. We will release relevant data, and if we have any further information, I will be happy...

Member
Baroness Altmann (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 May 2016
Reference
771 c1504
House
House of Lords

My Lords, when the Minister was describing the 20-metre rule and 50-metre rule, I could see a lot of puzzlement around the Chamber. It may just be that I was not keeping up with her, so will she indulge the House for a moment and clarify that? I understood from...

Member
Baroness Sherlock (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 May 2016
Reference
771 cc1504-5
House
House of Lords