Skip to main content

1-20 of 700 results for subject:Trusts

Session X
2015-16

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they will review, or charge others to review, the performance of the trustees of the BHS pension schemes, and whether the current trustees are fit and proper to continue performing that role at BHS and other pension schemes.

Asked by
Lord Myners (Crossbench)
Answering body
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 May 2016
Reference
HL8139
House
House of Lords
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Work and Pensions Committee
Date
11 May 2016
Reference
HC 579 2015-16
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Secretary Stephen Crabb
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Unprinted papers
Notes
Explanatory Memorandum withdrawn and replaced 1 June 2016 (UC 5 2016-17)
Date
9 May 2016
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

It is not for me to comment on that one, I think.

As I have said, any contribution cannot exceed 0.2% of annual salary. Clause 5 also empowers the trustees to vary the amount deducted from Members’ salaries by direction.

However, the news is really quite good in so far as it...

Member
Lord Naseby (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2016
Reference
771 c868
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Naseby, for introducing this measure both succinctly and clearly, which helps

the House. We are happy to support the Bill, and in doing so we pay tribute to those who had the foresight and solidarity to establish the fund initially back in...

Member
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2016
Reference
771 cc868-870
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank my noble friend Lord Naseby for introducing the Second Reading of this Bill today. As noble Lords have heard, calls on the fund have diminished over the years since the introduction of the parliamentary pension scheme. There are, on average, 45 applications each year, and it...

Member
Baroness Chisholm of Owlpen (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2016
Reference
771 cc870-1
House
House of Lords

Lords second reading. Agreed to on question. Bill committed to a Committee of the Whole House.

Lead member
Lord Naseby
Answering member
Baroness Chisholm of Owlpen
Department
Treasury
Type
Debates on bills
Date
22 April 2016
Reference
771 cc867-871
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is important that I declare two interests. First, I had the privilege of being the Member of Parliament for Northampton South for 23 and a half years and I am in receipt of a pension. Secondly, I am a trustee of the Parliamentary Contributory Pension Fund, known...

Member
Lord Naseby (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2016
Reference
771 cc867-9
House
House of Lords

Could this be the earliest example of check-off?

Member
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2016
Reference
771 c868
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank Her Majesty’s Opposition for the support they have given the Bill. This is not particularly relevant to the Bill, but I reflect that, just over 50 years ago, I stood in a general election for Islington North—a seat well known to the Opposition—and now stand here...

Member
Lord Naseby (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2016
Reference
771 c871
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am sorry to interrupt my noble friend. This is an important and necessary Bill. Is it not a bit late to for it to go through this House? Does he anticipate that it will get on to the statute book, and what is the process between now...

Member
Lord Hamilton of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2016
Reference
771 c871
House
House of Lords

My noble friend is right to say that it is late in the Session; nevertheless, I would not have taken up the Bill had I thought it was not going to be successful. We have had discussions across the channels in the usual way. My understanding is that if the...

Member
Lord Naseby (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2016
Reference
771 c871
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Altmann
Answering member
Lord McKenzie of Luton
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
14 March 2016
Reference
769 cc220-7GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in my view, the provisions in these regulations are compatible with the European Convention on Human Rights. By way of these draft regulations, we have responded to concerns raised by stakeholders by making some changes to ensure that occupational pension scheme governance requirements work as intended.

We already have...

Member
Baroness Altmann (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2016
Reference
769 cc221-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Altmann, for introducing these regulations in such a clear manner. We share the commitment to the importance of schemes being well governed. It is accepted that these regulations are generally focused on several technical amendments following on from governance requirements that were...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2016
Reference
769 cc223-4GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord McKenzie, for his remarks. I am grateful that he shares our commitment that schemes should be well governed and welcome that he has no quarrel with our proposed regulations on these measures. I shall try to respond to some of his questions.

The...

Member
Baroness Altmann (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2016
Reference
769 cc224-5GC
House
House of Lords

I will perhaps expand a little on the question, although maybe we should follow it up outside this session. I understand the thrust of employers needing to be “connected” for these purposes and, so far as partnerships are concerned, connection looks to be driven by a certain commonality of numbers...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2016
Reference
769 c225GC
House
House of Lords

I am happy to try to cover it if the answers that I have given are not sufficient. One of the crucial tests here is whether a scheme is promoting

itself to outside employers rather than being part of a group. If a company is being taken over or if...

Member
Baroness Altmann (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2016
Reference
769 c225GC
House
House of Lords

I was not going to come in on this regulation but the Minister’s comments have prompted a question in my mind. If a company is in the corporate group and participating in a pension scheme—so it does not come under the definition of a multiemployer scheme—and that company then leaves...

Member
Baroness Drake (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2016
Reference
769 c226GC
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness raises an interesting point, which I myself have explored. It is the case that if an employer leaves a previous group but the employees are still part of that scheme, it will be considered a connected scheme because the members are still part of the same group....

Member
Baroness Altmann (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2016
Reference
769 c226GC
House
House of Lords