1-13 of 13 results for subject:Vehicles
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.201 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.005 seconds
- Search query
- subject:Vehicles
- We searched for
- subject_t:Vehicles OR subject_ses:93413
Type
House
Session
More
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
Publisher
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they have made any national assessment of the power, sizes and trims of vehicles that police forces want to buy in part, or entirely, using police grant.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they have made any national assessment of the power, sizes and trims of vehicles that police forces want to buy in part, or entirely, using police grant.
Decisions about the number and types of vehicles required by police forces are matters for Chief Constables and Police and Crime Commissioners locally.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government, in considering the amount of police grant to allocate to each police force, what assessment they make of the case for urban forces, or those that do not regularly suffer snow, purchasing large four-wheel drives or SUVs.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government, in considering the amount of police grant to allocate to each police force, what assessment they make of the case for urban forces, or those that do not regularly suffer snow, purchasing large four-wheel drives or SUVs.
Core central Government funding to police forces in England and Wales is allocated annually on the basis of the Police Allocation Formula. The formula incorporates a number of indicators linked to demand on the police and does not include consideration of police spending. Local spending decisions are for the relevant Police and Crime Commissioner and Chief Constable.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, which types of (a) combat, (b) protected patrol and (c) reconnaissance vehicles in use by his Department were first brought into service in the (i) 1950s, (ii) 1960s, (iii) 1970s, (iv) 1980s and (v) 1990s.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, which types of (a) combat, (b) protected patrol and (c) reconnaissance vehicles in use by his Department were first brought into service in the (i) 1950s, (ii) 1960s, (iii) 1970s, (iv) 1980s and (v) 1990s.
Details of combat, protected patrol (PPV) and reconnaissance vehicles procured in the 1950s to 1990s, that are still in use are provided below.
Vehicle Type | Vehicle | Decade brought into service | ||||
|
| 1950s | 1960s | 1970s | 1980s | 1990s |
Combat | Challenger 2 Main Battle Tank |
|
|
|
| Yes |
Combat | Warrior Infantry Fighting Vehicle |
|
|
| Yes |
|
Combat | BULLDOG Armoured Personnel Carrier (FV 432)[1] |
|
|
| Yes |
|
Combat | Bandvagn 206 (BV 206) |
|
|
| Yes |
|
Combat | Artillery System 90 (AS 90) |
|
|
|
| Yes |
PPV | SNATCH Land Rover[2] |
|
|
|
| Yes |
Reconnaissance | Combat Vehicle Reconnaissance (Tracked) |
|
| Yes |
|
|
Reconnaissance | Weapons Mounted Installation Kit Land Rover (WMIK)[3] |
|
|
|
| Yes |
[1] BULLDOG is based on the FV432 Mk2 hull which entered service in the 1980s. The FV432 Mk1 entered service in the 1960s and was replaced by the Mk2. The FV432 Mk1 is no longer in service.
[2] Snatch 1 was procured in the 1990s. In the 2000s Snatch I was upgraded and extensively refurbished to a number of build standards (Snatch 2, 2A and 2B) which remain in-service in a variety of roles.
[3] The first WMIK’s were procured in the 1990s. Additional WMIKs were procured in the 2000s to provide a reconnaissance capability. All in-service WMIKs have been upgraded and refurbished to a new build standard.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what proportion of each type of (a) combat vehicles, (b) protected patrol vehicles and (c) reconnaissance vehicles was classified as fit for service in each of the last six years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what proportion of each type of (a) combat vehicles, (b) protected patrol vehicles and (c) reconnaissance vehicles was classified as fit for service in each of the last six years.
The proportion of the total fleet for each type of vehicles classified as fit for service in each year (as an average across the year) is included in the table below. Fit for service has been defined as achieving the minimum levels of safety performance (ballistic, blast, and structural integrity) as defined within the safety case.
Year | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 |
| |
Combat |
|
|
| |||||
Challenger 2 | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| |
Warrior | 84% | 85% | 83% | 84% | 90% | 82% |
| |
Protected Patrol |
|
|
| |||||
Cougar[1] | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| |
Foxhound | N/A | N/A | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| |
Snatch Landrover[2] | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| |
Vector[3] | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| |
Reconnaissance |
|
|
| |||||
CVR(T) | 76% | 65% | 61% | 96% | 90% | 87% |
| |
Jackal | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% | 100% |
| |
[1] Cougar Variants comprise Mastiff, Ridgback and Wolfhound
[[2] Vector vehicles were withdrawn from operational tasking in 2009
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many equipment failure reports were filed for each type of (a) combat vehicle, (b) protected patrol vehicle and (c) reconnaissance vehicle in each of the last six years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, how many equipment failure reports were filed for each type of (a) combat vehicle, (b) protected patrol vehicle and (c) reconnaissance vehicle in each of the last six years.
The number of equipment failure reports filed for each vehicle is included within the table below. These totals are for all failures reported to the Equipment Failure Reporting System; this will include reports raised incorrectly or unnecessarily. Totals are from 1 January to 31 December each year.
Year | 2010 | 2011 | 2012 | 2013 | 2014 | 2015 |
Combat |
| |||||
Challenger 2 | 880 | 686 | 431 | 976 | 1421 | 1708 |
Warrior | 535 | 551 | 518 | 803 | 1009 | 1583 |
Protected Patrol |
| |||||
Cougar variants[1] | 480 | 497 | 1018 | 1067 | 293 | 321 |
Foxhound | N/A | N/A | 609 | 621 | 528 | 1179 |
Landrover Variants | 98 | 245 | 391 | 857 | 1559 | 1011 |
Vector | 35 | 36 | 21 | 20 | 10 | 3 |
Reconnaissance |
| |||||
CVR(T) | 393 | 292 | 346 | 260 | 722 | 862 |
Jackal | 560 | 636 | 781 | 561 | 458 | 151 |
These figures reflect an increase in platform usage rates as the Army redeployed from operations in Afghanistan (where primarily Cougar variant Protected Patrol Vehicles and Jackal reconnaissance vehicles were used) to training on Challenger 2, Warrior, CVR(T), and Landrover vehicles. Equipment Failure Reports are raised for a wide range of fault types (from minor to major) and also for routine part replacement.
[1] Cougar Variants comprise Mastiff, Ridgback and Wolfhound
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what progress has been made in Project Starter to acquire explosive ordnance disposal unmanned ground vehicles.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government what progress has been made in Project Starter to acquire explosive ordnance disposal unmanned ground vehicles.
Project Starter passed Initial Gate in October 2014 and is currently in the Assessment Phase.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what recent discussions she has had on increasing the number of armed response (a) officers and (b) vehicles in the West Mercia police force area.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what recent discussions she has had on increasing the number of armed response (a) officers and (b) vehicles in the West Mercia police force area.
It is for Chief Officers in conjunction with Police and Crime Commissioners to determine the number of armed response officers and vehicles in their areas based on a thorough assessment of threat and risk. As announced in the Police Grant Report for England and Wales Written Ministerial Statement on 17 December 2015, this Government will provide £34 million in 2016-17 to enable a national uplift in armed policing capability and capacity to respond more quickly and effectively to a firearms attack. Decisions over where this money will be distributed are yet to be made, however for reasons of national security we do not publically disclose the detailed allocation of funding for counter terrorism by force area or by capability.
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, for which military vehicles components valued at £40 million were licensed for export to Egypt in March 2015; and if he will make a statement.
To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills, for which military vehicles components valued at £40 million were licensed for export to Egypt in March 2015; and if he will make a statement.
The licence was for chassis for manufacture of vehicles for use in counter-insurgency and counter-terrorism operations in Sinai. The licence application was carefully assessed against the Consolidated EU and National Arms Export Licensing Criteria and against the commitment made by EU Member States in August 2013 to suspend licensing for Egypt for equipment which might be used for internal repression.
All export licences are issued in strict accordance with the Consolidated EU and National Arms Export Licensing Criteria.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what information her Department holds on when former Metropolitan Police officer Gurpal Virdi was authorised to drive a police vehicle.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what information her Department holds on when former Metropolitan Police officer Gurpal Virdi was authorised to drive a police vehicle.
The Home Office does not hold information on when police officers are authorised to drive police vehicles. This information is held by individual police forces.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what guidance her Department has published for police services on carrying throw ropes in police vehicles.
To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what guidance her Department has published for police services on carrying throw ropes in police vehicles.
The Home Office has issued no guidance to the police on carrying throw ropes in police vehicles.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what recent discussions he has had with (a) the European Commission and (b) his EU counterparts on insurance cover for (i) tractors, (ii) quad bikes, (iii) ride-on lawnmowers, (iv) motorised wheelchairs and (v) motorised golf caddies.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what recent discussions he has had with (a) the European Commission and (b) his EU counterparts on insurance cover for (i) tractors, (ii) quad bikes, (iii) ride-on lawnmowers, (iv) motorised wheelchairs and (v) motorised golf caddies.
The Department’s consideration of motor insurance policy concerning vehicles such as these arises from the Vnuk judgement. This case, before the European Court of Justice concerned a man (Mr Vnuk) who was injured when he was knocked off a ladder by a trailer that was attached to a tractor in a barn in Slovenia. The effect of the judgment is that any vehicle that falls within the Motor Insurance Directive’s definition of a vehicle should have a compulsory motor insurance policy. The definition of vehicle in the Directives is very wide. We were disappointed with this judgment.
Officials are in regular dialogue with the European Commission and their EU counterparts about the challenges generated by the Vnuk judgment. This has included dedicated meetings with Commission officials, various exchanges with representatives of other Member States and attending a general meeting of Member States hosted by the Commission in May 2015.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, how many ambulance vehicles there were in the UK in each of the last five years.
To ask the Secretary of State for Health, how many ambulance vehicles there were in the UK in each of the last five years.
Ambulance services are a devolved matter and are the responsibility of the devolved administrations.
For England, this information is not collected centrally.