Skip to main content

1-20 of 229 results for subject:Insurance

Session X
2016-17

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, how many successful prosecutions there have been for personal injury insurance fraud in the last 12 months.

Asked by
George Howarth (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 April 2017
Reference
71344
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Science and Technology Committee
Date
26 April 2017
Reference
HC 1070 2016-17
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what assessment she has made of the efficacy of the mechanism by which the financial savings from her Department's proposed reform to personal injury claims will be returned to consumers by insurance companies; and how her Department will collate evidence to ensure...

Asked by
George Howarth (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 April 2017
Reference
71345
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, pursuant to the Answer of 23 March 2017 to Question 68479, on Compass: contacts, if she will make an estimate of the number of service providers that cover the cost of landlord insurance.

Asked by
Louise Haigh (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
18 April 2017
Reference
69554
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Secretary Greg Clark
Department
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
5 April 2017
Reference
SI 2017/516
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

My right honourable friend the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice has made the following Written Statement:

"As I committed on 27th February, when I set the new discount rate, I am today launching a six week consultation on how the Personal Injury Discount Rate, used to help calculate...

Member
Baroness Buscombe (Conservative)
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written statements
Date
30 March 2017
Reference
HLWS581
House
House of Lords

As I committed on 27th February, when I set the new discount rate, I am today launching a six week consultation on how the Personal Injury Discount Rate, used to help calculate lump sum payments of damages in personal injury claims, should be set in the future. The consultation document...

Member
Elizabeth Truss (Conservative)
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written statements
Date
30 March 2017
Reference
HCWS579
House
House of Commons

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness and the noble Lord, Lord Palmer of Childs Hill, for their time and commitment to the client money protection review. I am pleased to announce that the Government intend to make client money protection mandatory in line with the recommendation of the review chaired by the noble Baroness and the noble Lord, Lord Palmer of Childs Hill. This will ensure that every agent is offering the same level of protection, giving tenants and landlords the financial protection that they deserve. The Government will consult on how mandatory client money protection should be implemented and enforced.

Answered by
Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 March 2017
Reference
782 c466
House
House of Lords

Well, that has taken the wind out of my sails. Will the Minister accept my thanks? The House will recall that we put into the Housing and Planning Act the reserve power to do this but at that point the Government were not quite convinced. However, as the Minister said, along with the noble Lord, Lord Palmer, we did the report, and the recommendation was published only yesterday. Today’s news is really good for tenants and landlords. It means that if any letting agent goes bust or makes off, the client’s money is safe. I hope the Minister will accept my thanks.

Asked by
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
28 March 2017
Reference
782 c466
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I certainly will. That was a typically gracious response from the noble Baroness. It was a very well-reasoned report. Many people had been called to give evidence, so it was very strongly evidence-based. As I say, we will be consulting on implementation and enforcement. I am sure that we can talk about it in the meantime.

Answered by
Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 March 2017
Reference
782 c466
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have had a little more time to get some wind in my sails. I thank everybody who took part in this review: my

co-chair, the noble Baroness, Lady Hayter, the ministry and the civil servants, who were incredibly helpful. However, the review raises ongoing questions for the Government to tackle. For instance, enforcement is a key to success. Will the Minister tell us what he intends to do about the recommendation in the report that the Government consider,

“authorising a prime authority for enforcement, recognising CMP schemes and providing up to date information”?

Without that, the mandatory scheme will not have teeth.

Asked by
Lord Palmer of Childs Hill (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
28 March 2017
Reference
782 cc466-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, once again I thank the noble Lord for the part he has played in this. He asked specifically about one aspect of the consultation. As I say, we will be consulting on enforcement and implementation. He rightly draws attention to the fact that on occasion there has been a prime authority in this sort of area supervising the enforcement—Powys was an example used in the review, although in this instance, because it is England only, it cannot be Powys. A strong case has been made out, but of course we will be consulting on it.

Answered by
Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 March 2017
Reference
782 c467
House
House of Lords

My Lords, is it not essential in producing this final scheme that it should be as fair and as protected as the deposit protection schemes which exist for tenants’ deposits at present? In particular, there needs to be some kind of recognition that estate agents have to receive money in order to get the security checks, references and other things they need. They have to be carefully considered as well. It has to be fair to all parties.

Asked by
Baroness Gardner of Parkes (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
28 March 2017
Reference
782 c467
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it certainly does need to be fair to all parties. The evidence from the consultation was that about 85%, if I am not mistaken, backed the need for enforcement in this area, so that obviously was a key factor. I agree with my noble friend that the consultation will need to ensure that it is fair and equitable across a wide variety of people.

Answered by
Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 March 2017
Reference
782 c467
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare my interest as the chair of the council of the Property Ombudsman, which deals with complaints about managing and letting agents. I congratulate the noble Baroness, Lady Hayter, on her persistence in pursuing this matter and congratulate the Government on yielding to that persistence. Would the Minister agree that the value of this is not just about protecting landlords if agents go off with the money but about weeding out the more dubious and dodgy managing and letting agents because they will not be able to get the insurance that will now be mandatory?

Asked by
Lord Best (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
28 March 2017
Reference
782 c467
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I agree with the noble Lord. First, yielding to persuasive argument always seems to be the best and most sensible course to pursue, but I also agree with him about the importance of taking account of all those views and ensuring in the consultation that we act equitably and fairly across the piece.

Answered by
Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 March 2017
Reference
782 c467
House
House of Lords

Examination of witnesses. Written evidence reported to the House.

Lead member
Oliver Heald
Answering member
Nick Thomas-Symonds
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Committee
Prisons and Courts Bill Committee
Date
28 March 2017
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty’s Government whether they will make membership of a client money protection scheme mandatory for letting and managing agents.

Asked by
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
28 March 2017
Reference
782 cc466-7
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, whether it is the responsibility of (a) the contractor or (b) the landlord to cover the cost of landlord insurance under the Compass system.

Asked by
Louise Haigh (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 March 2017
Reference
68479
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, whether the indemnity provided by his Department to private land owners who make their land available for military training activities provides full cover to ensure the land area has no liability for claims arising from such training.

Asked by
James Heappey (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 March 2017
Reference
67943
House
House of Commons