1-4 of 4 results for subject:PwC
Librarians' tools
- Search time
- 0.21 seconds
- Solr query time
- 0.003 seconds
- Search query
- subject:PwC
- We searched for
- subject_t:PwC OR subject_t:"Price Waterhouse Coopers" OR subject_t:"Pricewaterhouse Cooper" OR subject_t:"Pricewaterhouse Coopers" OR subject_t:PricewaterhouseCoopers OR subject_ses:61905
Type
House
Session
Year
Department
Member
Primary member
Answering member
Legislative stage
Legislation
Subject
Publisher
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, pursuant to the Answer of 6 February 2017 to Question 62723, on government secondments, (a) what positions the staff from PWC were seconded to, (b) what the purpose of those secondments were, (c) what the equivalent payscales were of the positions to...
To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, pursuant to the Answer of 6 February 2017 to Question 62723, on government secondments, (a) what positions the staff from PWC were seconded to, (b) what the purpose of those secondments were, (c) what the equivalent payscales were of the positions to...
The PwC staff are seconded to HM Treasury and the Crown Commercial Service.
The individual seconded to HM Treasury is undertaking a role at pay band 1 of the Senior Civil Service, in the Finance Insight Team of the Public Spending Group. The secondment is from 04 October 2016 until 29 September 2017.
The individual seconded to the Crown Commercial Service is undertaking a role at Civil Service Grade 6 in the Strategic Programmes Directorate. The secondment is from 16 January 2017 until 16 January 2018.
These secondments are part of a centrally-managed talent programme in the Cabinet Office.
To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Young of Cookham on 28 December 2016 (HL4016), and in the light of the involvement of PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) in the LuxLeaks trials in Luxembourg and the reported pressure placed upon one of the LuxLeaks whistle-blowers to sign a...
To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answer by Lord Young of Cookham on 28 December 2016 (HL4016), and in the light of the involvement of PricewaterhouseCoopers (PwC) in the LuxLeaks trials in Luxembourg and the reported pressure placed upon one of the LuxLeaks whistle-blowers to sign a...
As stated in my response of 21 December 2016 (HL4016), the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 ensures that workers who raise concerns of wrongdoing to their employer or a relevant external body (by making what is known as a ‘protected disclosure’) and suffer detriment as a result may seek redress through an Employment Tribunal.
When a finding of unlawful practices has been made against the organisation at a Employment Tribunal, a public body may exclude that organisation from participation in a procurement procedure. This is laid out in the discretionary exclusion grounds of the Public Contracts Regulations 2015. Such a finding has not been made against PwC as a result of the LuxLeaks trials.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, with reference to the PwC report prepared for the Airports Commission entitled 2. Economy: Wider impact assessment, published in November 2014, whether he has had discussions with PwC on the modelling methodology used in that report.
To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, with reference to the PwC report prepared for the Airports Commission entitled 2. Economy: Wider impact assessment, published in November 2014, whether he has had discussions with PwC on the modelling methodology used in that report.
I have not had any discussions with PwC in relation to the reports referred to. The Department has had discussions with PwC on the modelling methodology used in the report prepared for the Airports Commission entitled 1. Strategic Fit: GDP/GVA Impacts, of June 2015 – the follow up study to 2. Economy: Wider impact assessment, published in November 2014.
As a result, in reaching our view on the preferred scheme, we have considered analysis underpinned by established appraisal methodologies rather than the techniques adopted by PWC and reported in the strategic case of the Airport Commission’s final report. These established methodologies were used by the Airports Commission to produce the economic case in their final report, which also underpins the Department’s Further Review and Sensitivities report.