Skip to main content

1-20 of 42 results for subject:Sellafield

Session X
2016-17

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, if he will publish the total lifetime cost of the Sellafield nuclear waste plant in Cumbria.

Asked by
Paul Flynn (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 April 2017
Reference
69841
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty’s Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Neville-Rolfe on 12 December 2016 (HL3602), what progress has been made by the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority to develop a plan for the disposition of plutonium; and whether they intend to review further options, including the building of a...

Asked by
Lord West of Spithead (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
6 February 2017
Reference
HL4920
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what estimate he has made of the cost of (a) emptying the Pile Fuel Storage Pond at Sellafield, (b) full radiological and toxicological decontamination of that pond and (c) conditioning, packaging and final long-term management of the spent...

Asked by
Kelvin Hopkins (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
20 January 2017
Reference
60332
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what information his Department holds on when officials from the Office of Nuclear Regulation last met Sellafield trades union leaders from (a) Unite, (b) Prospect and (c) the GMB.

Asked by
Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 December 2016
Reference
53763
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Committee of Public Accounts
Date
26 October 2016
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, for what reason employees at Sellafield Ltd are treated as being in the private sector for pension purposes and are regarded as being in the public sector for the purposes of a cap on exit payments.

Asked by
Helen Jones (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 October 2016
Reference
49089
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what representations he has received on the application of the cap on public sector exit payments to employees of Sellafield Ltd; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
Helen Jones (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
21 October 2016
Reference
49088
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what recent discussions he has had with the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority and Sellafield Ltd on safety performance at Sellafield.

Asked by
Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 September 2016
Reference
45455
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, if he will make an assessment of compliance of operations at Sellafield with regulatory safety standards.

Asked by
Baroness Hayman of Ullock (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
14 September 2016
Reference
45453
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what is their assessment of the BBC Panorama programme broadcast on 5 September concerning safety and its management at Sellafield; whether they plan to take any remedial action in the light of that programme; and if so, what.

Asked by
Lord Judd (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
12 September 2016
Reference
HL1620
House
House of Lords

Urgent question on safety at Sellafield.

Lead member
Jamie Reed
Answering member
Nick Hurd
Department
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Urgent questions
Date
6 September 2016
Reference
614 cc206-214
House
House of Commons

(Urgent Question): To ask the Secretary of State if he will make a statement on safety at Sellafield.

Member
Jamie Reed (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2016
Reference
614 c207
House
House of Commons

Ensuring high standards of nuclear safety and security will always be a top priority for the Government. On Sellafield, I can assure the House that there is no safety risk to site staff or the public, and it is wrong to suggest otherwise.

As the hon. Gentleman knows more than anyone,...

Member
Nick Hurd (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2016
Reference
614 c207
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for his response. The safety and security of Sellafield are the most important considerations for everyone working at the site. Safety is non-negotiable. As a former third-generation Sellafield worker, I know that the Sellafield workforce are acutely aware of its responsibilities towards the entire community and...

Member
Jamie Reed (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2016
Reference
614 cc207-8
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for his response, and I agree with him 100% about the non-negotiability of nuclear safety. There can be no disagreement on that, and I am glad that he recognises the progress being made all the time at Sellafield. I wish to place on record the...

Member
Nick Hurd (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2016
Reference
614 c208
House
House of Commons

Only last week, I was at Hinkley Point B seeing the very high standards the nuclear industry practises in terms of safety. Does the Minister agree that being able to have an open and sensible discussion about nuclear safety issues is a key part of keeping our industry safe? Does...

Member
Kevin Foster (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2016
Reference
614 c209
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for that positive and constructive intervention. This is a massively important issue on which no Government can show any complacency, but I believe that we have set up a proper framework and a robust system of transparency and accountability. Considerable progress continues to be made,...

Member
Nick Hurd (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2016
Reference
614 c209
House
House of Commons

Yesterday evening’s television report on Sellafield was profoundly disturbing, and my hon. Friend the Member for Copeland (Mr Reed) was absolutely right to request this urgent question—I thank you, Mr Speaker, for granting it. My hon. Friend expressed his concerns at the revelations and referred to the importance of the...

Member
Barry Gardiner (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2016
Reference
614 c209
House
House of Commons

Again, I thank the hon. Gentleman for a constructive response, which reflects the cross-party concern to get this absolutely right with no equivocation. Issues were raised in the programme about minimum safety levels. I think they were responded to adequately in the programme. We were reassured that the NDA always...

Member
Nick Hurd (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2016
Reference
614 c210
House
House of Commons

Does the Minister agree that it is essential that the BBC give the same prominence to the regulator’s response as it has to the original claims made?

Member
Tom Pursglove (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 September 2016
Reference
614 c210
House
House of Commons