Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,648 results for house:"House of Lords"

Session X
2017-19
Subject X
Reciprocal arrangements

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More
Reciprocal arrangements (1,648)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, this statutory instrument is part of the Government’s package to prepare for the possibility of the UK leaving the EU without a deal. The instrument relates to safety and security declarations on goods imported and exported between the UK and the EU. The Government’s aim is to leave...

Member
Lord Bethell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
799 cc1956-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, to give a degree of context about the scale of smuggling into the United Kingdom, the Government’s most recent figures, from August 2019, suggest that there was lost revenue to the United Kingdom of £2.5 billion in smuggled tobacco alone. To put it into further context, HMRC estimates...

Member
Lord Purvis of Tweed (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
799 cc1957-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I echo the comments that have been made welcoming my noble friend to the Front Bench. I support the regulations that we are discussing today but I have some questions; I hope my noble friend can reassure me.

If we have a no deal, the culture at the ports...

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
799 cc1959-1960
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I congratulate the Minister on his new role. It will be interesting to see if he will be the permanent Treasury representative; it is an onerous task that has worn out many a noble Lord.

I am generally unhappy with Explanatory Memorandums and the Minister has gone out of...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
799 cc1960-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank noble Lords very much for a really intense debate on a key Brexit measure that has been brought to the House. A lot of expertise has been brought to it, and it is my intention to try to reassure the House that this important statutory instrument...

Member
Lord Bethell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
799 c1961
House
House of Lords

Can I could seek further reassurance? Will the rules that are currently applied to keep these heinous crimes at bay continue, or will that actually be a problem because of the sheer scale of no-deal activity? That is my concern. Obviously, the security notice, once introduced, will help as well,...

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
799 c1961
House
House of Lords

The sheer scale is enormous, but the feedback from the haulage industry and HMRC is that they are putting in place the measures necessary for the highest level of declarations. Most of the measures put in place to tackle crime and smuggling are intelligence and data-led; they do not involve...

Member
Lord Bethell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
799 cc1961-2
House
House of Lords

Does the Minister think, in all honesty, that for a measure laid before Parliament on 5 September the publication of an impact assessment only on the morning that it is debated in this House is in any way appropriate, whether or not it is urgent? Is it not really rather...

Member
Lord Purvis of Tweed (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
799 c1962
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord makes a very fair point, but I reassure him that this impact assessment is not solely on this SI and is not an effort to try to mislead the Chamber. It is the overall HMRC impact assessment that covers, I believe, duties and the impact of all...

Member
Lord Bethell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
799 c1962
House
House of Lords

I hate to be picky, but I asked only one substantive question, which is whether the French have to agree to any of this.

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
799 c1962
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord asked a very good question. I apologise for not putting it at the top of the list because it is absolutely right. No. This is a matter for the UK. France and other EU member states will have their own requirements for safety and security which UK...

Member
Lord Bethell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
799 c1962
House
House of Lords

That is very illuminating and I am glad that the noble Lord, Lord Tunnicliffe, reminded the Minister of that point. I hope that this information on the impact on British business will be considered in any form of impact assessment. If the wavier is not part of a reciprocal agreement,...

Member
Lord Purvis of Tweed (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
799 c1963
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord puts it very well. The truth is that, in order to execute the SI before us, we do not require EU permission, which I think was the substance of the noble Lord’s initial question.

Member
Lord Bethell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
799 c1963
House
House of Lords

My question is on very much the same point. We are creating this SI, and I entirely accept that it is within domestic law to create a frictionless border, but if at the other side of the border there is a piece of EU bureaucracy—I must call it that rather...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
799 c1963
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in this Chamber we can execute only what is within the realms of our legislative ability. These are the measures that the industry and HMRC have sought from us. Negotiations with the EU to create the right kind of border will take place in the future. What we...

Member
Lord Bethell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
799 c1963
House
House of Lords

Perhaps the Minister might like to reflect on this conversation and see whether any of his colleagues could add some colour to that answer. There are quite a lot of deals relating to no-deal situations—I believe the EU calls them bonus deals—and I would be grateful, if there is further...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
799 c1963
House
House of Lords

This will be the last time I jump to my feet. If the Minister is coming back to the very sensible suggestion by the noble Lord, Lord Tunnicliffe, might he expand a little on our discussions with the Irish Government? The European Union is land-bordered with the United Kingdom, and...

Member
Lord Purvis of Tweed (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
799 c1963
House
House of Lords

I see the point of passing this order, even if we do not have a reciprocal situation. Business has asked for it. We rightly have done what is necessary. HMRC has done that. I also think that if we behave in a good way, the other member states will be...

Member
Baroness Neville-Rolfe (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
799 c1964
House
House of Lords

My noble friend puts it very well. I note the obvious disquiet in the Chamber, and I am very glad to undertake to write, as requested by the noble Lords, Lord Tunnicliffe and Lord Purvis, to try to clarify this. However, I can only present to the House what is...

Member
Lord Bethell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
799 c1964
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to approve. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Bethell
Answering member
Lord Tunnicliffe
Department
Treasury
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
799 cc1955-1964
House
House of Lords