Skip to main content

1-20 of 846 results for subject:Certification

Session X
2017-19

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords motion to approve. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Lord Duncan of Springbank
Answering member
Lord McNicol of West Kilbride
Department
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
799 cc1906-1914
House
House of Lords

Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
George Eustice
Answering member
Sandy Martin
Department
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
Second Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
7 October 2019
House
House of Commons

My Lords, the extension to Article 50 requires changes to legislation made earlier this year to ensure continued confidence in our consumer safety system. This statutory instrument will amend three earlier regulations: first, a number of product schedules in the Product Safety and Metrology etc. (Amendment etc.) (EU Exit) Regulations...

Member
Lord Duncan of Springbank (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
799 cc1907-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, moving between topics as varied as Hong Kong to product safety is one of the joys of being a Front-Bencher in the House of Lords.

The House is again debating an instrument to rectify problems with previous no-deal regulations, this time on the crucial issues of product safety and...

Member
Lord McNicol of West Kilbride (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
799 cc1908-1910
House
House of Lords

My Lords, once again I associate myself with the comments of the noble Lord, Lord McNicol, about the necessity for this debate, but now that it is here it is important to get it right so I am happy to have it.

I refer noble Lords to my entry in the...

Member
Lord Fox (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
799 cc1909-1911
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I draw attention to my interest as chair of National Trading Standards, which, as far as I know, is not involved in any of these regulations—but for all I know it might be.

I would like some clarity on two specific points. First, the Minister said that no specific...

Member
Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
799 cc1911-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this suite of regulations is quite technical, as the noble Lord, Lord McNicol, said. The original suite was a bundle, and anyone who has managed to carry it around will recognise that it could be measured in depth of inches. The important thing to stress is that I...

Member
Lord Duncan of Springbank (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
799 c1912
House
House of Lords

“Broadly” and “substantially” are broadly the same phrase, but why is that phrase being used? Is it because the department is not aware that there are any differences but thinks that there might be unintended differences, or is it aware that there are actual differences between the two situations?

Member
Lord Fox (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
799 c1912
House
House of Lords

My team has helpfully provided a note on that, just in case someone was querying whether they were indeed the same. On “substantially the same” and an essential requirement, certain essential requirements require the involvement of notified bodies. Post exit, these same essential requirements will require the involvement of UK-based...

Member
Lord Duncan of Springbank (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
799 c1912
House
House of Lords

We are getting there, but I am not sure that I know the difference between an approved and a notified body. Perhaps the Minister could write to me and the noble Lord, Lord McNicol, and place a copy in the Library, explaining what difference the word “substantially” makes regarding which...

Member
Lord Fox (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
799 c1912
House
House of Lords

I would be happy to do so, because we are stepping into the etymological element of the debate. As I understand it—I will happily put this in writing—the notion of a notified body and an approved body differs in so far as which is recognised by which entity. The UK...

Member
Lord Duncan of Springbank (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
799 c1913
House
House of Lords

Oh!

Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
799 c1913
House
House of Lords

Noble Lords will discover that I am full of these lines.

The noble Lord, Lord Fox, raised a couple of points. There should be no change to self-assessment whatever. On the question of the carcinogenic, mutagenic and reprotoxic elements—CMR—the rollover of the historic data rests within this particular body because it...

Member
Lord Duncan of Springbank (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
799 cc1913-4
House
House of Lords

Lord Harris!

Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
799 c1914
House
House of Lords

I apologise. My goodness, I would not wish the noble Lord to be seen as dallying with the other side. The noble Lord, Lord Harris, raised two specific questions, including on the impact assessment in its broadest sense. The detailed impact assessment was specific to the original material. He asked...

Member
Lord Duncan of Springbank (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
799 c1914
House
House of Lords
Laid by
Secretary Grant Shapps
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Statutory instruments
Notes
This Statutory Instrument has in part been made in consequence of defects in S.I 2019/837, S.I. 2019/825, S.I. 2019/518 and S.I. 2019/345.
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
SI 2019/1310
House
House of Commons; House of Lords

It has not proved possible to respond to this question in the time available before Prorogation. I will correspond directly with my noble Friend.

In the event that the UK leaves the EU without a deal, authorised representatives based in the EEA appointed and mandated before Exit may continue...

Member
Lord Duncan of Springbank (Conservative)
Department
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Ministerial corrections
Date
2 October 2019
House
House of Lords

It has not proved possible to respond to this question in the time available before Prorogation. I will correspond directly with my noble Friend.

After exit day, the Government is setting up a new UK regulatory regime. We recognise the valuable contribution UK Notified Bodies make to the economy,...

Member
Lord Duncan of Springbank (Conservative)
Department
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Ministerial corrections
Date
2 October 2019
House
House of Lords

It has not proved possible to respond to this question in the time available before Prorogation. I will correspond directly with my noble Friend.

In the event of the UK leaving the EU without a deal, on exit all ‘harmonised standards’ that gave a presumption of conformity to EU...

Member
Lord Duncan of Springbank (Conservative)
Department
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Ministerial corrections
Date
2 October 2019
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to approve. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Baroness Vere of Norbiton
Answering member
Lord Rosser
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
26 September 2019
Reference
799 cc1532-7
House
House of Lords