Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,512 results for subject:Ethics

Session X
2017-19

Type

-
Early day motions (12)
+ Legislation (3) + Bills (3) + Public bills (3)
-
Government bills (1)
+ Private members' bills (2)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (1)
-
Ten minute rule bills (1)
+ Members' contributions (1,408)
-
Oral answers to questions (37)
-
Oral question time interventions (3)
+ Oral questions (37)
-
Prime Minister's questions (1)
-
Topical questions (1)
-
Proceeding contributions (1,331)
+ Parliamentary committees (22) + Committee proceedings (13)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (6)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (1)
-
Legislative Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (5)
-
Select Committee reports (6)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (3)
+ Parliamentary papers (12)
-
Command papers (1)
-
House of Commons papers (4)
-
House of Lords papers (4)
-
Unprinted papers (3)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (49) + Debates (37)
-
Backbench debates (1)
+ Committee proceedings (13)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (6)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (1)
-
Legislative Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (5)
-
Debates on select committee reports (4)
-
e-petition debates (1)
+ Legislative debates (24)
-
Debates on bills (22)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (2)
-
Questions for short debate (1)
+ Statements (12) + Oral statements (4)
-
Ministerial statements (4)
-
Written statements (8)
+ Parliamentary questions (65) + Oral questions (37)
-
Prime Minister's questions (1)
-
Topical questions (1)
-
Written questions (28)

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, if she will introduce independent regulation of the media to protect people from invasive and unethical journalism.

Asked by
Madeleine Moon (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 October 2019
Reference
293499
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee reports (Government responses); Parliamentary committees
Committee
Science and Technology Committee
Date
8 October 2019
Reference
HC 2673 2017-19
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, which ethical committee gave consent to the Multicath study undertaken into reusable catheters by Professor Mandy Fader of Southampton University.

Asked by
Rosie Cooper (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
291566
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how many patients have been enrolled to use reusable catheters on the Multicath study undertaken by Professor Mandy Fader of Southampton University; and if he will make a statement.

Asked by
Rosie Cooper (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
7 October 2019
Reference
291567
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House has considered regulating the internet of things.

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Gapes, in a debate on such an important subject. I am a tech evangelist. I believe that technology is an engine of progress. Growing up in the north-east,...

Member
Chi Onwurah (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 October 2019
Reference
664 cc401-4WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is making a very important speech. I, too, have spent time reading the Zuboff book, and the more I read it, the more alarmed I became. Does she agree with me that the real issue is the one she started with: whose data

is it? Without that...

Member
Daniel Zeichner (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 October 2019
Reference
664 c404WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend, who is a great champion of innovation and technology—coming from the constituency that he represents, it is appropriate—makes a critical point. I could not have put it better. Although this debate is about regulation of the internet of things, it is impossible to talk about protection and...

Member
Chi Onwurah (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 October 2019
Reference
664 cc405-8WH
House
House of Commons

How long do you think we’ve got?

Member
Matt Warman (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 October 2019
Reference
664 c408WH
House
House of Commons

We have an hour and a half, which will be more than adequate. I should perhaps have said that the Minister has a background in technology, as a tech correspondent, so I am sure that he has the answers to all the questions.

Member
Chi Onwurah (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 October 2019
Reference
664 c408WH
House
House of Commons

Loth as I am to interrupt the exam paper, which I am sure will come to an end soon, a practical application of the questions came up not long ago with the facial recognition monitoring of my constituents at King’s Cross station. I hope that the Minister will be able...

Member
Daniel Zeichner (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 October 2019
Reference
664 c408WH
House
House of Commons

That is another excellent intervention from my hon. Friend. I look forward to the Minister’s response about facial recognition technology and consent.

I have asked the Minister nine questions and here is the 10th and final one: can we have a comprehensive forward-looking review of digital rights and responsibilities to deliver...

Member
Chi Onwurah (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 October 2019
Reference
664 c408WH
House
House of Commons

I, too, look forward to hearing the Minister’s response to all those questions in a few minutes’ time. I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Newcastle upon Tyne Central (Chi Onwurah) on securing the debate, which covers some of the most challenging issues that society—

indeed, humanity—will face over...

Member
Jon Cruddas (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 October 2019
Reference
664 cc408-9WH
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for his excellent remarks, which cover the ethical debate about technology that we too rarely have about the internet of things. One

example of the approach he describes—the idea that technology can solve all our problems—is the proposals for alternative arrangements on the island of...

Member
Chi Onwurah (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 October 2019
Reference
664 c409WH
House
House of Commons

That is bang on. For many in silicon valley, that confidence in the potential of technology goes hand in hand with a widespread libertarianism. As the role of technology and profit margin expands, so the role of the state should contract.

My hon. Friend did not mention those who come at...

Member
Jon Cruddas (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 October 2019
Reference
664 cc410-1WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is making excellent points. Although my remarks on Brexit and technology were limited, I want to emphasise his point. If we agree that part of the Brexit vote was based on people’s sense of disconnect from Brussels and the corridors of power, how much greater will that...

Member
Chi Onwurah (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 October 2019
Reference
664 c411WH
House
House of Commons

Exactly. These are essential issues for the democratic character of western market democracies. That takes us back to the question my hon. Friend asked the Minister about the Government’s proposed remedies and policies. As it stands, policy proposals to meet these challenges are phenomenally weak. For instance, they include developers...

Member
Jon Cruddas (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 October 2019
Reference
664 cc411-2WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Gapes. I congratulate my friend the hon. Member for Newcastle upon Tyne Central (Chi Onwurah), with whom I serve on the all-party parliamentary group for Africa, on securing this debate and being very fleet of foot in doing so. Of...

Member
Patrick Grady (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 October 2019
Reference
664 c412WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for giving way. I recognise that while I did acknowledge a debate between the north-east and the north-west of England as to whether they were the home of the industrial revolution, I failed to acknowledge Scotland’s claim, which is equal. I will only add that...

Member
Chi Onwurah (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 October 2019
Reference
664 c412WH
House
House of Commons

I think there is enough credit for it to be happily shared. It is a timely debate, not least in the context of the Prime Minister’s speech at the UN General Assembly. Both the hon. Lady and the hon. Member for Dagenham and Rainham (Jon Cruddas) have made comprehensive contributions...

Member
Patrick Grady (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 October 2019
Reference
664 cc412-4WH
House
House of Commons

What a fantastic debate we have had this afternoon. I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for Newcastle upon Tyne Central (Chi Onwurah) very warmly on securing it. I am extremely glad that she started with a brief account of the industrial revolution, which started in 1712 when the Newcomen...

Member
Liam Byrne (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 October 2019
Reference
664 cc414-6WH
House
House of Commons