Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,185 results for subject:Privacy

Session X
2017-19

Type

+ Legislation (6) + Bills (1) + Public bills (1)
-
Government bills (1)
+ Delegated legislation (5)
-
Statutory instruments (5)
+ Members' contributions (1,050)
-
Maiden speeches (2)
-
Oral answers to questions (29)
-
Oral question time interventions (1)
+ Oral questions (29)
-
Prime Minister's questions (2)
-
Proceeding contributions (991)
+ Parliamentary committees (42) + Committee proceedings (24)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (6)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (5)
-
Legislative Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (6)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (6)
-
Select Committee reports (7)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (3)
-
Select Committee written evidence (11)
+ Parliamentary papers (32)
-
Command papers (2)
-
House of Commons papers (20)
-
House of Lords papers (3)
-
Proposed negative statutory instruments (2)
-
Unprinted papers (5)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (74) + Debates (46)
-
Adjournment debates (1)
+ Committee proceedings (24)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (6)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (5)
-
Legislative Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (6)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (6)
-
Debates on select committee reports (4)
+ Legislative debates (33)
-
Debates on bills (23)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (10)
-
Questions for short debate (2)
+ Statements (28)
-
Written statements (28)
+ Parliamentary questions (57) + Oral questions (29)
-
Prime Minister's questions (2)
-
Written questions (28)

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee
Date
8 October 2019
Reference
HC 2204 2017-19
House
House of Commons

The Government firmly believe in press freedom. Clearly, that freedom comes with a responsibility to ensure that it is not abused. It is not unreasonable to expect the press to act with understanding in relation to sensitive personal stories. It is not for Government to arbitrate, but it is important that we have systems in place so that individuals can take complaints to independent bodies to be assessed.

Answered by
Baroness Morgan of Cotes (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
3 October 2019
Reference
664 c1349
House
House of Commons

Last month saw yet another example of a high-profile sports figure having to deal with tabloid newspapers publishing deeply personal and distressing information about his family’s private lifer. Leveson was supposed to change the way such publications operated. Does the Secretary of State agree that incidents such as that seem to suggest that it is just business as usual, with sales and profit being put before individuals’ rights to privacy?

Asked by
Martyn Day (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
3 October 2019
Reference
664 c1349
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for his question. All of us have complete empathy with the strong feelings of both Ben Stokes—I believe that is the story the hon. Gentleman is referring to—and Gareth Thomas, who experienced a similar invasion of privacy

in the same week. Decisions on whether the press’s actions in those cases were in breach of its agreed standards should be made by the independent regulatory bodies. The press said it wanted to be self-regulated. I wait to see in these particular examples, if complaints are made, how that self-regulation works.

Answered by
Baroness Morgan of Cotes (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
3 October 2019
Reference
664 c1349
House
House of Commons

In March last year, the current Secretary of State for Health and Social Care stood at that Dispatch Box and axed the second part of the Leveson inquiry because he said that the culture in the media had changed. When we look at what has happened to the Duchess of Sussex, Gareth Thomas and Ben Stokes, we see that the culture of invasion of privacy has not changed. The Secretary of State says it is not for the Government to arbitrate such matters, so will she now resurrect the independent inquiry and let us properly move this forward?

Asked by
Alex Norris (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
3 October 2019
Reference
664 c1350
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for his question, but I do not agree. The media landscape has changed significantly in the six years since the Leveson inquiry report was published. We believe that the steps we have taken mean that to continue with part 2 of Leveson is no longer appropriate, proportionate or in the public interest.

Answered by
Baroness Morgan of Cotes (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
3 October 2019
Reference
664 c1350
House
House of Commons

The family of my Livingston constituent Kirsty Maxwell have faced the unimaginable tragedy of losing her in suspicious circumstances in Benidorm in 2017, when she fell to her death from a balcony. To compound that horror, they have since had to face repeated violations of their privacy and intrusion from some journalists and media outlets. Does the Secretary of State agree that we have a duty of care to our citizens, especially those who have been traumatised and faced a loss of such magnitude, to protect their privacy and the memory of their loved ones? Will she meet me to discuss this and the recommendations that will be in my upcoming report on deaths abroad and support for families when they face media intrusion?

Asked by
Hannah Bardell (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
3 October 2019
Reference
664 c1350
House
House of Commons

I would of course be happy to meet the hon. Lady to discuss this issue. I am very sorry for everything that has happened to Kirsty’s family and friends after that unimaginable tragedy. I hope that at our meeting we can discuss whether in fact complaints have been made and how the system of self-regulation has worked in that case.

Answered by
Baroness Morgan of Cotes (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
3 October 2019
Reference
664 c1350
House
House of Commons

What recent steps she has taken to tackle incidences of media (a) intrusion and (b) violations of privacy.

Asked by
Martyn Day (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
3 October 2019
Reference
912541; 664 cc1349-1350
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what assessment she has made of the effectiveness of Independent Press Standards Organisation on improving the conduct of the press intruding into the private lives of non-political public figures.

Asked by
Jo Stevens (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 October 2019
Reference
291587
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. We want to make the UK the safest place in the world to go online for our children, but also for all members of our society. Our online harms White Paper set out our plans to make companies more responsible for their users’ safety online, especially children, and also sets out measures to reinforce powers to issue fines against those who put them at risk.

Answered by
Dominic Raab (Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
2 October 2019
Reference
664 c1218
House
House of Commons

Q4

.

Margot James (Stourbridge) (Ind):

Does the right hon. Gentleman agree that legislation to establish a tough independent regulator of internet companies empowered to challenge the automatic right to anonymity online should be a priority for the Queen’s Speech?

Asked by
Margot James (Independent (affiliation))
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
2 October 2019
Reference
664 cc1218-9
House
House of Commons

What steps she has taken to ensure commercial compliance with the General Data Protection Regulation on techniques designed to make individual privacy difficult for consumers.

Asked by
David Davis (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Withdrawn
Date
30 September 2019
Reference
912539
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what recent assessment she has made of the (a) effect of increased use of facial recognition software on privacy and (b) the adequacy of existing legislation to protect privacy.

Asked by
Catherine West (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Notes
Supreme Court ruling of 24 September that Parliament was not prorogued on 9 September.
Date
9 September 2019
Reference
284231
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Joint Committee on Human Rights
Date
9 September 2019
Reference
HC 1810 2017-19
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee
Date
4 September 2019
Reference
HC 2204 2017-19
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Digital, Culture, Media and Sport Committee
Date
3 September 2019
Reference
HC 2204 2017-19
House
House of Commons

An informal meeting of EU Interior and Justice Ministers took place on 18/19 July in Helsinki, Finland. The Home Office Europe Director, Chris Jones, represented the UK for Interior Day. The Ministry of Justice Director, International and Rights, Paul Candler, represented the UK on Justice Day.

Interior Day began with a...

Member
Sajid Javid (Conservative)
Department
Home Office
Type
Written statements
Date
24 July 2019
Reference
HCWS1805
House
House of Commons

My rt hon Friend the Secretary of State for the Home Department (Sajid Javid) has today made the following Written Ministerial Statement:

An informal meeting of EU Interior and Justice Ministers took place on 18/19 July in Helsinki, Finland. The Home Office Europe Director, Chris Jones, represented the UK for Interior...

Member
Baroness Williams of Trafford (Conservative)
Department
Home Office
Type
Written statements
Date
24 July 2019
Reference
HLWS1767
House
House of Lords
Type
Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Women and Equalities Committee
Date
24 July 2019
House
House of Commons