Skip to main content

1-20 of 34 results for subject:Streaming

Session X
2017-19

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, with reference to the Guidance on how to prepare for Brexit if there's no deal, published by the Department for Exiting the European Union, what parts of the plan for broadcasting and video on demand in the event...

Asked by
Chuka Umunna (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
2 September 2019
Reference
279022
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, if he will introduce a 9pm watershed on advertising of junk food products on (a) TV and (b) on-demand services.

Asked by
Grahame Morris (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 July 2019
Reference
277703
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what steps the Government is taking to ensure the BBC remains economically competitive against video streaming services.

Asked by
Andrew Rosindell (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
17 June 2019
Reference
262273
House
House of Commons

That this House congratulates young Welsh rock duo Alffa on reaching over 2.8 million streams of their song Gwenwyn on Spotify; notes that this is the first ever Welsh language song to reach over one million streams; acknowledges the rising popularity of music streaming services and Welsh language music; commends...

Primary sponsor
Liz Saville Roberts (Plaid Cymru)
Type
Early day motions
Date
15 May 2019
Reference
2394
House
House of Commons

If he will take steps to increase the (a) number of subtitled programmes on demand and (b) quality of subtitling for people who are deaf or hard of hearing.

Asked by
Rosie Cooper (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
11 April 2019
Reference
658 c444; 910369
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady is quite right: on-demand programme services need to catch up. The Ofcom proposals were made at the end of last year and are receiving consideration by my Department. In the meantime, best practice guidance has been introduced. It is voluntary at the moment, but for example Netflix has made 100% of its content available with subtitles.

Answered by
Margot James (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
11 April 2019
Reference
658 c444
House
House of Commons

In December, Ofcom recommended that 40% of video-on-demand content should be provided with subtitles within two years and 80% within four years. Will the

Minister say whether she is prepared to introduce secondary legislation to ensure that that is done within a decent timeframe?

Asked by
Rosie Cooper (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
11 April 2019
Reference
658 c444
House
House of Commons

Tabled by

Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury

To ask Her Majesty’s Government what assessment they have made of the speech of the Chief Executive of Ofcom on 28 November 2018 in which she encouraged public service broadcasters to collaborate to compete with global giants such as Netflix and Amazon in producing high-quality original content.

Asked by
Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Notes
Question asked by Lord Foster of Bath on behalf of Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury
Date
28 March 2019
Reference
796 cc1867-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, on behalf of my noble friend Lady Bonham-Carter and with her permission, I beg leave to ask the Question standing in her name on the Order Paper.

Member
Lord Foster of Bath (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Oral question time interventions
Date
28 March 2019
Reference
796 c1867
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Government recognise many of the issues and new challenges facing our public service broadcasters, highlighted by the Ofcom chief executive in her speech on 28 November last year. The Government are committed to supporting the PSBs to ensure that they continue to meet audience needs in future and remain at the heart of our world-class TV industry. This may mean PSBs collaborating to compete and forming new partnerships to achieve greater reach and impact. The BritBox proposal recently announced by the BBC and ITV is an example of this, and we look forward to seeing more detail on this service as it develops.

Answered by
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 March 2019
Reference
796 c1867
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for his reply, but does he agree that in this fast-changing world—with US-based on-demand video streaming services such as Netflix, Amazon and now Apple increasingly penetrating the UK market—we need an agile regulatory regime that does not act as a brake on UK innovation? Netflix updates its platform once a week, yet it could take up to eight months for Ofcom to approve very modest changes to the BBC’s iPlayer. Should we not find a quicker way to approve BBC initiatives that benefit UK audiences and new proposals—such as the joint venture proposed by ITV and the BBC for BritBox—that could provide additional investment for new British content?

Asked by
Lord Foster of Bath (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
28 March 2019
Reference
796 c1867
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I agree with the noble Lord that we should have nimble and agile PSBs and therefore a regulatory system that is capable of dealing with that. The analogy he draws is not quite correct. Netflix can change its platform overnight because it has to consider only Netflix, whereas Ofcom has to consider the whole regulatory landscape. It is therefore important that it takes into account what effect it has if the BBC changes something such as the iPlayer.

I take the point he makes about being nimble and agile and moving with the times. The chief executive of Ofcom made that point exactly when she said that it needed to be,

“a forward-looking regulator that supports the future success of UK TV, firmly rooted in the online world”.

Answered by
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 March 2019
Reference
796 cc1867-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, collaboration obviously brings opportunities, but will my noble friend comment on the importance of ensuring, and indeed what is being done to ensure, that PSBs carry on making programmes that the UK viewer wants to watch—as opposed, perhaps, to what the American viewer wants to watch?

Asked by
Baroness Chisholm of Owlpen (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
28 March 2019
Reference
796 c1868
House
House of Lords

My noble friend is absolutely right. This is one problem with US subscription services. They spend a huge amount on content. Netflix spent £4.6 billion on content in 2017 and Amazon spent £3.4 billion, but only £150 million of that was UK-made TV, whereas the public service broadcasters spent £2.6 billion on UK content.

Answered by
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 March 2019
Reference
796 c1868
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome the Minister’s replies to questions thus far put, but in the speech that occasioned the Question the Ofcom commissioner talked about competition and collaboration between the public service broadcasters and the great platforms that we are talking about—the FANGs. In other words, this is not just about competition between public service broadcasters and these various bodies; collaboration needs to happen between them. She points to certain instances such as “King Lear” and “Dracula” that are evidence of such collaboration already taking place.

I must not outlast my welcome, but I have one tiny thing to finish. Apart from BritBox—this thing that is coming between ITV and the BBC—I have recently been made aware of other boxes that are the result of piracy and people taking the market away from all the bodies that we have thus far discussed. What kind of eye are we keeping on such activities in this ever-emerging field?

Asked by
Lord Griffiths of Burry Port (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
28 March 2019
Reference
796 c1868
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord is right that there has already been a lot of collaboration. Collaboration exists between Netflix and other subscription video on demand services and the public service broadcasters. That will continue and is being encouraged. Illegal boxes are illegal. They will be prosecuted within the law because they take away the benefits that public service broadcasting brings to ordinary citizens and consumers in this country.

Answered by
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 March 2019
Reference
796 c1868
House
House of Lords

My Lords, one protection for public service broadcasters in the 2003 Act was prominence in the listings, yet now both the FANGs that have been described and the manufacturers are calculatingly getting around the listings to shunt public service broadcasting into the sidings. It will need from the Government and the regulator more than passive observation. Active action will be needed if the PSBs are to be protected.

Asked by
Lord McNally (Liberal Democrat)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
28 March 2019
Reference
796 c1868
House
House of Lords

I agree with that. That is why we promised to legislate when Ofcom gives us its recommendations for the online prominence regime. If it needs legislation, the Secretary of State says that we will do that.

Answered by
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 March 2019
Reference
796 c1868
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does the Minister recall that Ofcom found that RT had breached the regulations seven times? Is he concerned that the appeal by RT is taking a very long time? Meanwhile, it is continuing to pump out Putin’s propaganda all over the United Kingdom, with polemic programmes fronted by people such as George Galloway and Alex Salmond.

Asked by
Lord Foulkes of Cumnock (Labour)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
28 March 2019
Reference
796 c1869
House
House of Lords

One difference between this country and Russia is that there is a rule of law. The legal process is being followed, which includes regulation that Parliament has given to Ofcom, independent of government. That will be followed, and I trust that something useful will happen from it.

Answered by
Lord Ashton of Hyde (Conservative)
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
28 March 2019
Reference
796 c1869
House
House of Lords