Skip to main content

1-20 of 50 results for subject:Succession

Session X
2017-19

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, if he will make it his policy to end male primogeniture for hereditary titles.

Asked by
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 July 2019
Reference
270718
House
House of Commons

That this House recognises the decades of service of Japan’s Emperor Akihito and his wife, Empress Michiko, as he abdicates the throne after a 30-year reign; notes his dedication to his public duties as a symbol of the state; commends his efforts to ease the painful memories of war and...

Primary sponsor
Roger Godsiff (Labour)
Type
Early day motions
Date
30 April 2019
Reference
2343
House
House of Commons

In light of recent objection to the Hereditary Titles (Female Succession) Bill of my hon. Friend the Member for Shipley (Philip Davies) that would address the discrimination against daughters when it comes to inheritance, when do the Government intend to end the practice of male primogeniture?

Asked by
Helen Grant (Conservative)
Answering body
Women and Equalities
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
25 April 2019
Reference
658 c878
House
House of Commons

The Daughters’ Rights campaign was started after one new mum was told that her new arrival being a girl must have been a disappointment to her. This matter and the issue of courtesy titles are complex matters, but we do need to look at them in this modern age. My Department is working on that, and I welcome the Daughters’ Rights campaign.

Answered by
Penny Mordaunt (Conservative)
Answering body
Women and Equalities
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
25 April 2019
Reference
658 c878
House
House of Commons

Ten minute rule motion for leave to bring in a Bill. Motion opposed. Original question agreed to. Presentation and first reading (Bill 349). To be read a second time on 22 March.

Lead member
Philip Davies
Answering member
Martin Docherty-Hughes
Type
Debates on bills
Date
5 March 2019
Reference
655 cc815-8
House
House of Commons
Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Ten minute rule bills
Date
5 March 2019
Reference
Bill 349 2017-19
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That leave be given to bring in a Bill to make provision for the succession of female heirs to hereditary titles; and for connected purposes.

Mr Speaker, you will know that I often argue that the law should treat everyone equally, irrespective of their sex, and where that...

Member
Philip Davies (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 March 2019
Reference
655 cc815-6
House
House of Commons

I thought I lived in the 21st century, and although I can commend those sitting in the Public Gallery who are seeking equality within the peerage, and although I understand their frustration, it would be disingenuous of me, belonging to a political party that fundamentally believes in the abolition of...

Member
Martin Docherty-Hughes (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 March 2019
Reference
655 cc816-7
House
House of Commons

I did not mean to attribute dishonour to the hon. Member, who is of course entitled to their opinion, as is every other Member of the House—but, for the record, I think he is talking tosh.

There is no equality when we embed privilege for those, be they men or women,...

Member
Martin Docherty-Hughes (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 March 2019
Reference
655 cc817-8
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they allow individuals to leave their premium bonds to beneficiaries in their wills; and if not, why not.

Asked by
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Answering body
Treasury
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
4 March 2019
Reference
HL13850
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Berkeley, for introducing the Bill and for the comprehensive way in which he opened the debate. We welcome the Bill. As the noble Lord, Lord Wakeham, and the noble Lord, Lord Adonis, suggested, I do not suppose that the noble Lord, Lord...

Member
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2018
Reference
793 cc1087-1090
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare an interest: I live with my wife in the Isles of Scilly; she has lived there for over 40 years. I have been following royal transport costs for many years and make no secret of my opinion that some of the Royal Family’s transport costs have...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2018
Reference
793 cc1080-3
House
House of Lords

My noble friend referred earlier to the tax position of the Duchy of Cornwall and the fact that it pays tax on a voluntary basis. My understanding is that the revenue surplus of the Duchy of Cornwall has increased by 50% in the last seven years and that its property...

Member
Lord Adonis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2018
Reference
793 c1082
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Berkeley, for raising once again this important issue. He has brought these measures forward in a number of guises and is a true crusader for reform in this area. I thank all noble Lords for their valuable contributions to the...

Member
Lord Young of Cookham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2018
Reference
793 cc1091-4
House
House of Lords

What has happened to the tax paid by the Duchy of Cornwall in recent years? The Minister gave last year’s figure. Can he say how that figure has changed?

Member
Lord Adonis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2018
Reference
793 c1094
House
House of Lords

I have the figures for only the past three years in my brief. I think that the noble Lord’s queries went further back than that, so I will write to him. I would just say that the Labour Party voted for the Sovereign Grant Act.

Member
Lord Young of Cookham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2018
Reference
793 c1094
House
House of Lords

I want to make one comment prior to the Minister’s response to my noble friend. There may be good reasons—I can see them in principle and in practice—for insisting on more transparency surrounding the costs at Buckingham Palace, for instance, but the expectation that it will hold costs stable or...

Member
Lord Reid of Cardowan (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2018
Reference
793 c1094
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord said that he wanted to make a comment rather than ask a question and he did exactly that.

I conclude by expressing reservations about the Bill. The Duchy of Cornwall plays an important role in providing funds to support the public and private lives of six members of...

Member
Lord Young of Cookham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2018
Reference
793 cc1094-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to all noble Lords who spoke. We have had a fascinating debate. I am not surprised by the comments from the Minister—or the noble Lord, Lord Wakeham, for that matter—which I would have expected.

However, this demonstrates the confusion over what is part of government and...

Member
Lord Berkeley (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2018
Reference
793 c1095
House
House of Lords

My Lords, first, I congratulate the noble Lord on his persistence. He has obviously done a lot of work and, as he said, this is the fourth time he has produced a Bill, although I think it is only the second time that any of them have been debated. That,...

Member
Lord Wakeham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 October 2018
Reference
793 cc1084-5
House
House of Lords