Skip to main content

1-20 of 8,679 results for subject:Women

Session X
2017-19

Type

-
Early day motions (25)
+ Legislation (5) + Bills (5) + Public bills (5) + Private members' bills (5)
-
Presentation bills (2)
-
Private members' bills (HL) (2)
-
Ten minute rule bills (1)
+ Members' contributions (7,105)
-
Business questions (89)
-
Maiden speeches (5)
-
Oral answers to questions (601)
-
Oral question time interventions (14)
+ Oral questions (634)
-
Prime Minister's questions (42)
-
Topical questions (116)
-
Points of order (4)
-
Proceeding contributions (5,849)
+ Parliamentary committees (100) + Committee proceedings (34)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (3)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (3)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (2)
-
Legislative Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (9)
-
Second Reading Committee proceedings (1)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (15)
-
Select Committee reports (11)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (12)
-
Select Committee written evidence (50)
+ Parliamentary papers (74)
-
Annual reports (2)
-
Command papers (13)
-
House of Commons papers (58)
-
House of Lords papers (1)
-
Unprinted papers (2)
-
White papers (1)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (259) + Debates (135)
-
Adjournment debates (1)
-
Backbench debates (11)
+ Committee proceedings (34)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HC) (3)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (3)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (2)
-
Legislative Grand Committee proceedings (HC) (1)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (9)
-
Second Reading Committee proceedings (1)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (15)
-
Debates on select committee reports (8)
-
e-petition debates (2)
-
Estimates days (3)
+ Legislative debates (37)
-
Debates on bills (28)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (9)
-
Opposition days (3)
-
Questions for short debate (14)
+ Formal proceedings (2)
-
Non-legislative formal proceedings (2)
+ Petitions and observations (5)
-
Observations on petitions (3)
-
Paper petitions (2)
+ Statements (92) + Oral statements (19)
-
Business statements (1)
-
Ministerial statements (17)
-
Speaker's statements (1)
-
Written statements (73)
-
Urgent questions (1)
+ Written corrections (24)
-
Ministerial corrections (24)
+ Parliamentary questions (1,932)
-
Business questions (89)
+ Oral questions (634)
-
Prime Minister's questions (42)
-
Topical questions (116)
-
Urgent questions (1)
-
Written questions (1,208)
+ Petitions and observations (5)
-
Observations on petitions (3)
-
Paper petitions (2)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he is taking to ensure that women receive the same standard of care as men during diagnosis, treatment and aftercare of heart disease or a heart attack.

Asked by
Jim Cunningham (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 October 2019
Reference
292090
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister for Women and Equalities, what progress has been made on the Government Equalities Office review of its engagement with women and women's organisations; and when she plans to publish the findings of that review.

Asked by
Dawn Butler (Labour)
Answering body
Women and Equalities
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 October 2019
Reference
263099
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, what steps he is taking to tackle the misconception that heart attacks do not happen to women among (a) doctors and (b) the public.

Asked by
Jim Cunningham (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 October 2019
Reference
292091
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Defence, what estimate he has made of level of sickness absence among women in the armed forces in the latest period for which figures are available.

Asked by
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Answering body
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 October 2019
Reference
294243
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House has considered the procedure for appointing judges.

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Sharma. I look forward to a positive and perhaps consensual debate on the procedure for appointing judges and the importance of those procedures being consistent with the independence...

Member
Stuart C McDonald (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 October 2019
Reference
664 c499WH
House
House of Commons

Does the hon. Gentleman agree that the independence of our judiciary and the way in which we appoint them is admired right across the world, and that that fits in with our role in the Council of Europe, which is there to uphold the rule of law?

Member
John Howell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 October 2019
Reference
664 c499WH
House
House of Commons

I agree with the hon. Gentleman wholeheartedly. I will return to that point later. The exchanges that sparked those headlines came when the Attorney General was asked by one of his Back Benchers whether it was time for MPs to get involved in approving appointments at the Supreme Court level....

Member
Stuart C McDonald (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 October 2019
Reference
664 cc499-501WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Gentleman on securing this important debate, and I join him in congratulating the hon. and learned Member for Edinburgh South West (Joanna Cherry) on the stunning cases that she brought over the past two weeks. Regarding diversity, the old system required the Lord Chancellor to make...

Member
Keith Vaz (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 October 2019
Reference
664 c500WH
House
House of Commons

I do not have a ready answer to that. The numbers show that it may not have gone far enough. I agree that there is more to be done to ensure that we have a bench that reflects the society that it serves, but I am not sure what the...

Member
Stuart C McDonald (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 October 2019
Reference
664 c500WH
House
House of Commons

I congratulate the hon. Gentleman on securing the debate, and I agree with much of what he has said. I support the separation of powers and the independence of the judiciary. Many judges—particularly those with academic backgrounds—may, although they were

appointed through an independent process, have expressed views in the...

Member
Dan Poulter (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 October 2019
Reference
664 c500WH
House
House of Commons

I welcome that intervention, and the hon. Gentleman raises an interesting question. There are a couple of things I would say. First, we will never have a judicial bench that does not have political opinions. Just because we do not necessarily know what those opinions are does not mean that...

Member
Stuart C McDonald (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 October 2019
Reference
664 cc502-3WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Mr Sharma.

I warmly congratulate the hon. Member for Cumbernauld, Kilsyth and Kirkintilloch East (Stuart C. McDonald) on securing this debate. I agreed with virtually every word he said, and I hope we can establish a consensus in Westminster Hall. Like him,...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 October 2019
Reference
664 c503WH
House
House of Commons

Would my hon. Friend make a distinction between the sort of confirmation hearings that we hold as members of the Select Committee on Justice and those in the United States? The ones we hold are very much part of the establishment and are a way of looking at the process,...

Member
John Howell (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 October 2019
Reference
664 c503WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is right. There are two misnomers in this sense. Confirmation, in the strict sense of the word, is not really what we are doing. We are scrutinising the integrity of the appointments process, which is an altogether different matter and entirely consistent with our tradition. In the...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 October 2019
Reference
664 cc503-4WH
House
House of Commons

I am most grateful to the Chair of the Select Committee for giving way. May I declare my interest, which I forgot to do earlier, as a non-practising barrister? My wife is a part-time judge. I put this to the hon. Gentleman: with the system we have now—as opposed to...

Member
Keith Vaz (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 October 2019
Reference
664 c504WH
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman reminds me to refer Members to my entries in the Register of Members’ Financial Interests. I think I would approach the matter he raises in this way: for transparency and because the judiciary needs the confidence not only of the profession but of the wider population...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 October 2019
Reference
664 c504WH
House
House of Commons

I am most grateful to the hon. Gentleman for giving way for a second time and enabling me to tempt him a little further. The cut-off age has deprived us of some pretty distinguished judges. Does he think we should go that step further and raise the limit from 70...

Member
Keith Vaz (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 October 2019
Reference
664 c504WH
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman tempts me and I fall into the trap willingly: I entirely agree with him. It is a great shame that we have seen the retirement recently of very distinguished and able judges simply by effluxion of time. Lord Thomas of Cwmgiedd, Sir Brian Leveson, Lady Hallett—I...

Member
Robert Neill (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 October 2019
Reference
664 cc504-5WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairpersonship, Mr Sharma. I congratulate my hon. Friend the Member for

Cumbernauld, Kilsyth and Kirkintilloch East (Stuart C. McDonald) on securing this important debate. What a pleasure it is to speak after the Chair of the Justice Committee, the hon. Member for...

Member
Joanna Cherry (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 October 2019
Reference
664 cc505-6WH
House
House of Commons

As I was sitting here, it occurred to me that a former colleague of ours, albeit from before our time in the House, Humfrey Malins, who was the hon. Member for Woking, was, while he was a sitting MP,

a practising barrister and, I believe, a recorder. I do not...

Member
Dan Poulter (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 October 2019
Reference
664 c506WH
House
House of Commons