Skip to main content

1-20 of 273 results for subject:Privatisation

Session X
2019-19

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Not for the first time, the Prime Minister is talking nonsense. Of course we need to import medicines from various places; I just want it to be done in an open and transparent way. I do not want secret talks between Government officials, on behalf of Ministers, and big pharma corporations in the USA.

Last year, 34,000 cancer patients waited more than two months for treatment. Although early detection is obviously very important, the longer people wait, the less chance there is of their surviving cancer. The Prime Minister knows that, I know that, the whole world knows that—why can he not get it, and put the necessary resources into the NHS to cut the waiting times ?

Asked by
Jeremy Corbyn (Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
30 October 2019
Reference
667 c358
House
House of Commons

If he could just be patient for 30 seconds.

The Prime Minister claims that the NHS is safe in his hands; why, then, has NHS privatisation doubled under this Government, with nearly £10 billion being spent on private companies in our NHS?

Member
Jeremy Corbyn (Labour)
Type
Oral question time interventions
Date
30 October 2019
Reference
667 c358
House
House of Commons

The NHS is receiving unrivalled and unprecedented sums of taxpayers’ money. If the right hon. Gentleman is seriously saying that he would not like dentists, opticians and Macmillan care nurses to work with the NHS, he must be out of his mind. Cancer survival rates have actually increased year on year since 2010, and more and more people are seen within the right waiting time, thanks to the investments that we are making. I think he should pay tribute to the hard work of NHS staff, stop talking down their incredible achievements, and recognise that if we are allowed to come back as the next Government, we will invest massively in the NHS and take it forward with the funds that we will make available from a strong and growing economy. The reality is that he would wreck that economy.

Answered by
Boris Johnson (Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
30 October 2019
Reference
667 c358
House
House of Commons

The Prime Minister does not answer the question that I put to him, which was about environmental, consumer and workers’ rights. I am not surprised, because he once said that “employment regulation” was “back-breaking”, and he voted for the anti-Trade Union Act 2016, which stripped away employment protections. The provisions in the Bill offer no real protection at all.

Yesterday, during the debate on the Bill, the Prime Minister pledged that the NHS was safe in his hands. If that is the case, will he be backing our amendment in the Queen’s Speech debate tonight, which would undo the very damaging privatisation of so much of our NHS?

Asked by
Jeremy Corbyn (Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
23 October 2019
Reference
666 c960
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman is showing complete ignoratio elenchi—a complete failure to study what we actually passed last night in that historic agreement. It is very clear that it is open to the House to do better, where it chooses, on animal welfare standards or social protections, as indeed this country very often does. We lead the way: we are a groundbreaker in this country. I am afraid to say that the right hon. Gentleman has no other purpose in seeking to frustrate Brexit than to cause a second referendum.

As for the NHS, this is the party whose sound management of the economy took this country back from the abyss and enabled us to spend another £34 billion on the NHS—a record investment—and, as I promised on the steps of Downing Street, to begin the upgrade of 20 hospitals, and as a result of the commitments this Government are making, 40 new hospitals will be built in the next 10 years. That is this party’s commitment to the NHS. [Interruption.]

Answered by
Boris Johnson (Conservative)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
23 October 2019
Reference
666 c960
House
House of Commons

Queen's speech debate (fifth day) on the National Health Service. (Part 1 of 2).

Lead member
Jonathan Ashworth
Answering member
Matt Hancock
Department
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Queen's speech debates
Date
23 October 2019
Reference
666 cc990-1015
House
House of Commons

Queen's speech debate (fifth day), on the National Health Service. Closure motion. Agreed to on question. Amendment negatived on division (282 to 310). (Part 2 of 2).

Lead member
Philippa Whitford
Answering member
Edward Argar
Department
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Queen's speech debates
Date
23 October 2019
Reference
666 cc1016-1080
House
House of Commons

We are absolutely acting on the area that the hon. Lady quite rightly raises. The number of patients who are in in-patient facilities who have learning disabilities and/or autism has been falling—the number has fallen from 2,700 a couple of years ago to 2,250 on the latest figures. We have...

Member
Matt Hancock (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 October 2019
Reference
666 c1014
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Baroness Berger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 October 2019
Reference
666 c1014
House
House of Commons

I thank the Secretary of State for very kindly giving way, and I welcome the fact that he will be taking forward into legislation the recommendations of the independent review into the Mental Health Act. Will that be accompanied by Sir Simon Wessely’s recommendation that the sector needs £800 million...

Member
Baroness Berger (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 October 2019
Reference
666 c1014
House
House of Commons

I want to pay tribute to the work that Sir Simon has done in bringing this matter forward. We are absolutely looking at the capital requirements, as well as the requirements for revenue funding, which have gone up in this area. We will be publishing a White Paper by the...

Member
Matt Hancock (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 October 2019
Reference
666 c1014
House
House of Commons

Before I start my speech, I would like to factually correct the Secretary of State, who claimed that Barnett consequentials in Scotland are not passed on. I reassure him they are all passed on. He talks about the figures as a percentage. Scotland spends £185 a head more on healthcare...

Member
Philippa Whitford (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 October 2019
Reference
666 c1017
House
House of Commons

It is in the other place at the moment.

Member
Matt Hancock (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 October 2019
Reference
666 c1017
House
House of Commons

Okay; I welcome that. However, I would suggest that the Healthcare Safety Investigations Bill is about looking at mistakes after they have happened. I invite the Secretary of State again to look at the Scottish patient safety programme, which is more than 10 years old and has reduced hospital deaths,...

Member
Philippa Whitford (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 October 2019
Reference
666 c1017
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady is making a perfect point. I had the honour of being the roads Minister, and I desperately asked my officials to look at the PFI contracts on motorways around the country, including the M25. They found that the cost of coming out of these contracts is so...

Member
Mike Penning (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 October 2019
Reference
666 c1017
House
House of Commons

I thank the right hon. Gentleman for that point. Of course, Governments can borrow at a much lower interest rate than any private business. Money is being sucked out of the NHS through the PFI across the UK, but there are also other ways in which money is being sucked...

Member
Philippa Whitford (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 October 2019
Reference
666 c1018
House
House of Commons

I agree with almost everything the hon. Lady says about PFI contracts. We got a terrible PFI contract in Halifax and Calderdale. It is still a millstone around our necks. When I chaired the Education and Skills Committee, we looked at PFI contracts. The fact is that they are financial...

Member
Barry Sheerman (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 October 2019
Reference
666 c1018
House
House of Commons

That is true, and this obviously applies to the process of bidding and tendering for delivering services. An NHS orthopaedic department will not be able to compete with a major multinational with regards to its bid team, its tendering team and its ability to put in loss leaders. The problem...

Member
Philippa Whitford (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 October 2019
Reference
666 c1018
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Member for Hemel Hempstead (Sir Mike Penning) mentioned the Barking, Havering and Redbridge University Hospitals NHS Trust in Romford. Queen’s Hospital in Romford is part of that trust, as is King George Hospital in my constituency. There is an independent treatment centre on the site of King...

Member
Mike Gapes (The Independent Group for Change)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 October 2019
Reference
666 c1018
House
House of Commons

Well, I am afraid that it was the Labour party that set up independent treatment centres. I am a surgeon, and one of the issues was that such centres were sucking away the routine elective work that contributes

to training future surgeons, and leaving the NHS to deal with the...

Member
Philippa Whitford (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
23 October 2019
Reference
666 cc1018-9
House
House of Commons