Skip to main content

1-20 of 348 results for subject:Separation

Session X
2019-21

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Right Honourable Friend, The Secretary of State for Work and Pensions (Dr Thérèse Coffey MP) has made the following Written Statement.

The Department for Work and Pensions has today published annual statistics covering 2019/20 including on Households Below Average Income (HBAI) and Separated Families. HBAI covers a range of information,...

Member
Baroness Stedman-Scott (Conservative)
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written statements
Date
25 March 2021
Reference
HLWS890
House
House of Lords

The Department for Work and Pensions has today published annual statistics covering 2019/20 including on Households Below Average Income (HBAI) and Separated Families. HBAI covers a range of information, including household incomes and a range of low-income indicators for 2019/20, derived from the Family Resources Survey of around 20,000 households.

Between...

Member
Baroness Coffey (Conservative)
Department
Department for Work and Pensions
Type
Written statements
Date
25 March 2021
Reference
HCWS892
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what assessment her Department has made of the effectiveness of the use of the Public statement: relationship no longer subsisting forms.

Asked by
Bell Ribeiro-Addy (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
1 September 2020
Reference
77820
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many Public statement: relationship no longer subsisting forms were received by the her Department in in each month since 2016.

Asked by
Bell Ribeiro-Addy (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 July 2020
Reference
75447
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, how many (a) arrests, and (b) deportations have been made as a result of Public statement: relationship no longer subsisting forms received by the Home Office since 2016.

Asked by
Bell Ribeiro-Addy (Labour)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 July 2020
Reference
75448
House
House of Commons

New clause 25 (Repeal of provisions about defence for controlling or coercive behaviour offence) debated and withdrawn. New clause 28 (Controlling or coercive behaviour offence) debated and withdrawn. New clause 29 (Domestic Abuse: immigration and nationality legal aid), debated with new clause 35 (Victims of domestic abuse: leave to remain)...

Lead member
Victoria Atkins; Alex Chalk
Answering member
Peter Kyle; Jess Phillips
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Committee
Domestic Abuse Bill Committee
Date
17 June 2020
House
House of Commons

Committee stage. Clause 1, discussed with amendments, new clauses 1 to 6 and 9, clauses 2 to 9, and the schedule to the Bill. Clause 1 agreed to. Clauses 2 to 8 agreed to. Government amendment made to clause 9, with the clause agreed to as amended. New clause 1...

Lead member
Robert Buckland; Alex Chalk
Answering member
Alex Cunningham
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on bills; Committee of the Whole House (HC)
Date
17 June 2020
Reference
677 cc845-906
House
House of Commons

First, I associate myself with the comments from my colleague and good friend on the Front Bench, my hon. Friend the Member for Stockton North (Alex Cunningham), who gave us a clear outline of where the Labour party and the Opposition are on the amendments that have been tabled.

I rise...

Member
Stella Creasy (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 June 2020
Reference
677 cc865-9
House
House of Commons

I beg to move amendment 1, page 2, line 8, leave out “20” and insert “46”

This amendment would extend the minimum legal period for a divorce from six months to one year (with the additional six weeks between the conditional and final orders).

Member
Fiona Bruce (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 June 2020
Reference
677 c846
House
House of Commons

This Bill is a bad Bill. It sends out the wrong message at the wrong time. No-fault divorce is really state-approved unilateral divorce. Ministers like to say that it is all about the divorce process and not about marriage. They are wrong. The removal of fault sends out the signal...

Member
Fiona Bruce (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 June 2020
Reference
677 cc849-851
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Lady for her considerable contribution in setting the scene for us. She and I have a very similar outlook on life, as I believe others in this House have as well. Is it her intention to ensure, through her amendments and new clauses, that services to...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 June 2020
Reference
677 c851
House
House of Commons

I absolutely agree—indeed, not just from the very beginning of a marriage, but from before it, as I shall mention shortly when I refer to new clause 1.

I return to the important point that a great many family breakdowns may be a lot more salvageable than is commonly assumed, and...

Member
Fiona Bruce (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 June 2020
Reference
677 cc851-2
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady is most gracious in giving way. She will understand and agree with me and probably others that churches offer such services. Is it possible within this legislation, with the extra money that will come through if the new clause is accepted, for the Government to work alongside...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 June 2020
Reference
677 c852
House
House of Commons

When we had the Second Reading debate on the Bill not so long ago, the Lord Chancellor made the very good observation that if we were serious about strengthening marriages and relationships in this country, we needed to do so through what was termed

“the right end of the telescope”.—[Official Report,...

Member
Andrew Selous (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 June 2020
Reference
677 cc876-7
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is making a compelling argument on an amendment that seeks to make what most sensible people would regard as a modest change to the Bill, which is simply to say that where we can support reconciliation, we will do so. The Government have been offered that compromise,...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 June 2020
Reference
677 c877
House
House of Commons

I agree with what my right hon. Friend says.

Eagle-eyed observers of the amendment paper will have noted that new clause 1, in the name of my hon. Friend the Member for Congleton (Fiona Bruce), and amendment 7 are identical. In fact, I have a confession to make to the House:...

Member
Andrew Selous (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 June 2020
Reference
677 cc877-8
House
House of Commons

I rise to speak in support of amendment 1 tabled by my hon. Friend the Member for Congleton (Fiona Bruce), and in so doing I take this opportunity to praise her, particularly for all the work that she does in this and so many other areas, and our former colleague,...

Member
David Amess (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 June 2020
Reference
677 cc878-881
House
House of Commons
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 June 2020
Reference
677 c880
House
House of Commons

I rise to speak to new clause 3, which stands in my name. It would replicate Scottish law, which replaces the two and five-year separation with a no-fault divorce after one year. It is a moderate compromise and I have no doubt that the Government will accept it.

I believe the...

Member
Edward Leigh (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 June 2020
Reference
677 cc880-3
House
House of Commons

But it is even worse than that because, as the Law Society points out, the respondent might not even know that they were being divorced. It will usually be a lady who is divorced by a man who has gone, as my right hon. Friend has described, and they might...

Member
John Hayes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 June 2020
Reference
677 c883
House
House of Commons