Skip to main content

1-20 of 132 results for house:"House of Lords"

Session X
2021-22
Subject X
Arms trade

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Laid by
Penny Mordaunt
Department
Department for International Trade
Type
Statutory instruments
Date
28 April 2022
Reference
SI 2022/491
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty's Government, further to the massacre in Kayah State on 24 December, what plans they have to join the EU in backing an international arms embargo against Myanmar.

Asked by
Baroness Cox (Crossbench)
Answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
24 January 2022
Reference
HL5228
House
House of Lords

Lords motion to take note of the Agreement between the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, the Government of Australia and the Government of the United States of America for the Exchange of Naval Nuclear Propulsion Information, laid before the House on 29 November 2021....

Lead member
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town
Answering member
Baroness Goldie
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Debates on treaties
Date
17 January 2022
Reference
817 cc157-186GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am delighted to open this debate. In doing so, I thank my colleagues on the International Agreements Committee—particularly my noble friend Lady Liddell and the noble Lord, Lord Lansley, from whom we will hear shortly—together with our officials for their superlative efforts in turning round our report,...

Member
Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2022
Reference
817 cc157-9GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as a member of the International Agreements Committee I am very pleased to have this opportunity to follow our Chair, the noble Baroness, Lady Hayter of Kentish Town. I very much look forward to this debate, which will include several expert contributions that will be of particular value...

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2022
Reference
817 cc159-160GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I should at the outset make it clear that I welcome the agreement by the US and the UK to make naval nuclear propulsion

information available to Australia, one of our oldest and most valuable allies. A step such as this, which will substantially enhance the deterrent capacity...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2022
Reference
817 cc160-2GC
House
House of Lords

I too congratulate the noble Baroness, Lady Hayter, and the committee for the work they have done and for creating the opportunity to debate this issue and the agreement before us. Like the noble Lord, Lord Hannay, I welcome it. As the noble Baroness, Lady Hayter, said, it is particularly...

Member
Baroness McIntosh of Pickering (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2022
Reference
817 cc162-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as the UK redefines its role in the world, it must remain globally competitive, dynamic and outward facing. The key foreign policy strategy for that is the integrated review which we launched on 16 March last year.

As president of the CBI, I know that business welcomed the importance...

Member
Lord Bilimoria (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2022
Reference
817 cc163-6GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Hayter, for tabling this Motion to take note of the Exchange of Naval Nuclear Propulsion Information Agreement. It was announced in a joint statement in September last year and immediately had strategic impact. Although China was not mentioned, the whole thrust of...

Member
Lord West of Spithead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2022
Reference
817 cc164-7GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the United States has also established a US submarine advisory committee, which is advising the Australians on options. Can the Minister say whether we have anyone on that committee? What relationship does that advisory committee have with the US nuclear-powered submarine task force currently working with the UK...

Member
Lord West of Spithead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2022
Reference
817 cc167-8GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Hayter, for the opportunity for this short debate. I reassure her that, although I am a landlubber, the importance of the nuclear enterprise transcends single service interests. Indeed, in common with most former defence chiefs, I maintain a close interest in the nation’s nuclear...

Member
Lord Houghton of Richmond (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2022
Reference
817 c168GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it seems a bit strange that we all recognise how important this agreement is—it is extremely important—but that

this is the only opportunity, in this room today, to scrutinise it in detail. I support it, as indeed do all noble Lords who have spoken this afternoon, but there...

Member
Baroness Liddell of Coatdyke (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2022
Reference
817 cc168-170GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I agree with and support in principle the agreement we are debating. It will strengthen our strategic position in the Indo-Pacific and help to bolster our relationship with the Five Power Defence Arrangements, which is, in my view, necessary in the light of China’s increasing assertiveness in the...

Member
Lord Boyce (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2022
Reference
817 cc170-2GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I feel as though we might be in the middle of a game of parliamentary musical chairs and that at some point one of us making winding speeches is going to find that we are interrupted by the bell, so I am not sure whether I should aim...

Member
Baroness Smith of Newnham (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2022
Reference
817 cc172-3GC
House
House of Lords

The point I was making, as we were interrupted by the bell, concerns what happens if this agreement does not take us in the direction anticipated and work is undertaken, perhaps by the United Kingdom and UK businesses, but ultimately, we do not see any submarine sales on the order...

Member
Baroness Smith of Newnham (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2022
Reference
817 cc173-4GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I too thank my noble friend Lady Hayter and her committee for the report and for calling this debate. The committee invites us to look not only at the agreement in front of us but at the broader area in which it fits. It is important to see...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2022
Reference
817 cc174-6GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I first thank the noble Baroness, Lady Hayter, and her committee for their report and for calling this debate. I also thank all noble Lords for their genuinely interesting and very well-informed contributions.

Let me just reprise the salient features of the AUKUS information-sharing agreement. I am very grateful...

Member
Baroness Goldie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2022
Reference
817 cc176-7GC
House
House of Lords

Is it reasonable to infer, from what my noble friend has said, that if a follow-on agreement is subject to examination by the treaties committee in the Australian Parliament, it will also be subject to scrutiny through CRaG in this Parliament?

Member
Lord Lansley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2022
Reference
817 c177GC
House
House of Lords

I wish to reassure my noble friend and the Committee that the spirit and intention of the Government is that scrutiny is important; it is at the heart of what they wish to see Parliament do, and it would be exceptional if scrutiny were denied. I hope that reassures my...

Member
Baroness Goldie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2022
Reference
817 cc177-180GC
House
House of Lords

My other question relates to the fact that the Americans have nominated a very high-ranking person to drive this programme. It seems that we are allowing our National Security Adviser, who is responsible for all sorts of things, to do it. As we know, because of the sheer complexity of...

Member
Lord West of Spithead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2022
Reference
817 c180GC
House
House of Lords