Skip to main content

1-20 of 202 results for subject:Intimidation

Session X
2021-22

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I initiate this debate on the recent by-elections acutely aware that Britain’s history in Zimbabwe, from the first days of Cecil Rhodes’ chartered company to the last days of Ian Smith’s white supremacist regime, is a deeply troubled one. Throughout that time, political dissent was violently supressed, political...

Member
Lord Oates (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2022
Reference
821 cc47-50GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Oates, deserves all our warm congratulations, not just on this debate but on keeping Zimbabwe on our agenda, considering its past and continuing connections with this country. Nelson Chamisa also deserves our admiration for winning seats for the CCC despite appalling conditions: rallies and...

Member
Earl of Sandwich (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2022
Reference
821 cc50-1GC
House
House of Lords

Like the noble Earl, Lord Sandwich, I thank and congratulate my noble friend Lord Oates on not only obtaining this debate but flying the flag for a better Zimbabwe. He does so not only in the Chamber but in the All-Party Parliamentary Group on Zimbabwe.

My first engagement with the name...

Member
Lord Alderdice (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2022
Reference
821 cc51-3GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I welcome this short debate and congratulate my friend the noble Lord, Lord Oates, on his perseverance in getting it and on his excellent speech which outlined practically the whole short history of Zimbabwe. It is vital to raise awareness of what is happening in the deeply entrenched...

Member
Baroness Hoey (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2022
Reference
821 cc53-5GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in this debate it is a real pleasure to follow the noble Baroness and pay tribute to her commitment: her frequent visits, the report she carried out and the work she did in the House of Commons. She wears her commitment to the support of those women in...

Member
Lord Purvis of Tweed (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2022
Reference
821 cc55-7GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, thank the noble Lord, Lord Oates, for initiating this debate and for his excellent introduction. As he rightly says, it is for the people of Zimbabwe to determine their own future, but continued violations of human rights, including impediments to free and fair elections, remain a...

Member
Lord Collins of Highbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2022
Reference
821 cc57-8GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Oates, for tabling this debate and for his continued interest and tenacious advocacy as co-chair of the APPG on Zimbabwe, which has been of huge benefit to the House. I thank all noble Lords for their insightful contributions.

The by-elections of 26 March...

Member
Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
26 April 2022
Reference
821 cc58-62GC
House
House of Lords

Lords question for short debate on what assessment the Government have made of reports of (1) state sanctioned political violence, (2) voter roll irregularities, and (3) the intimidation of voters, ahead of the 26 March parliamentary and local by-elections in Zimbabwe.

Lead member
Lord Oates
Answering member
Lord Goldsmith of Richmond Park
Department
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Type
Questions for short debate
Date
26 April 2022
Reference
821 cc47-61GC
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government what representations they have made to the government of Hong Kong following reports of threats and intimidation of Benedict Rogers, a UK citizen and Chief Executive of Hong Kong Watch.

Asked by
Bishop of St Albans (Bishops (affiliation))
Answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 March 2022
Reference
HL7070
House
House of Lords

I beg to move,

That this House insists on its disagreement with the Lords in their amendment 58 but proposes amendments (a) to (c) in lieu.

Member
Kit Malthouse (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 March 2022
Reference
711 c623
House
House of Commons

Our position on Lords amendment 58 has always been that we accept the case in principle that the Food Standards Agency should have direct access to relevant police powers to enable it to tackle food crime, but that such powers should be accompanied by appropriate accountability mechanisms, including in relation...

Member
Kit Malthouse (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 March 2022
Reference
711 cc623-4
House
House of Commons

I am listening with great care to my right hon. Friend’s remarks about reporting—a concern that, as he knows, I share, having been in office when we made that

undertaking, which I regard as very solemn. In order to help, I hope later to develop an argument about sentencing guidelines,...

Member
Robert Buckland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 March 2022
Reference
711 c624
House
House of Commons

As usual, my right hon. and learned Friend has made a helpful suggestion. We will certainly review as he suggests. It is worth bearing in mind what we are trying to achieve, which is twofold. First, we obviously want to encourage women and girls to come forward and report in...

Member
Kit Malthouse (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 March 2022
Reference
711 cc625-6
House
House of Commons

Obviously, Northern Ireland has a history and tradition of protesting, and it is about getting the right balance. I say honestly to the Minister that I, and probably other Opposition Members, would like Lords amendment 73 to be approved. If someone is preaching the Gospel, or if a single person...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 March 2022
Reference
711 c626
House
House of Commons

There is no desire or intention to suppress religious or other freedoms. This is about giving the police powers not to ban protest or assembly, but to place conditions on it. As I said in previous stages of the Bill, the job of this House in a democratic society is...

Member
Kit Malthouse (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 March 2022
Reference
711 c626
House
House of Commons

Can I take this point just a little further? This is about an interpretation not only of how loudly something is being said, but of what is being said. Is the Minister saying that the Bill

would allow a police officer to make a judgment that he does not like...

Member
Ian Jnr Paisley (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 March 2022
Reference
711 c626
House
House of Commons

The amendments have no bearing on the content of the noise, merely on the impact the noise is having on people nearby from a decibel or distress point of view. Other legislation governs content, particularly if it promotes hatred or incites violence, although as I hope the hon. Gentleman will...

Member
Kit Malthouse (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 March 2022
Reference
711 c627
House
House of Commons

I must press the Minister further. We surely live in a society that allows difficult things to be said. Unfortunately, the Bill is going down a road—it is considerably un-Tory-like, I have to say—where difficult things will no longer be allowed to be said, or at least to be said...

Member
Ian Jnr Paisley (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 March 2022
Reference
711 c627
House
House of Commons

Not at all. Difficult things will and should still be said loudly, proudly and boldly, but it may be different in certain circumstances—for example, we have already conceded in the Bill that certain things should not necessarily be said consistently loudly, proudly and boldly outside a school. We have already...

Member
Kit Malthouse (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 March 2022
Reference
711 c627
House
House of Commons

The question of distress and alarm is an interesting one jurisprudentially. By what means does the Minister anticipate that it will be established in court? Does he see it as an objective or subjective test?

Member
Alistair Carmichael (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 March 2022
Reference
711 c628
House
House of Commons