Skip to main content

1-20 of 571 results for subject:Protest

Session X
2024-26

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for the Home Department, what steps she is taking to protect the right to peaceful protest in Devon.

Asked by
Martin Wrigley (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Home Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
128416
House
House of Commons

Stephen Yaxley-Lennon is urging his followers to behave ahead of the “Unite the Kingdom” march on 16 May. The Met police have allowed the fascists the freedom to march in central London. By contrast, the organisers of the annual Nakba march, who provided the Met with details last December, are...

Member
Kim Johnson (Labour)
Type
Business questions
Date
16 April 2026
Reference
783 c1015
House
House of Commons

I know that my hon. Friend is a keen campaigner on these matters. I am sure that the Met police will have heard her comments. Where there is the threat of a demonstration turning to violence or disorder, the Met police have a responsibility to take that very seriously indeed,...

Member
Alan Campbell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 April 2026
Reference
783 c1015
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Joint Committee on Human Rights
Date
15 April 2026
Reference
HC 1788 2024-26
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend will no doubt be aware that this important matter falls under the remit of the Home Secretary, with whom I am in full agreement that the right to peaceful protest is a vital part of our democracy. However, peaceful protest does not extend to unlawful behaviour. Should a protest contravene the law, the police have the powers to respond, and such behaviour will be met with appropriate consequences.

Answered by
Jake Richards (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
17 March 2026
Reference
782 c736
House
House of Commons

Proposals to restrict the right to protest based on “cumulative disruption” are causing great concern. It is absurd that a march by an anti-racist group one week could be blocked because an anti-abortion march occurred the week before, and that this power could be extended across large parts of a city. Such a significant change demands proper scrutiny. This House must have adequate time to debate and vote on this issue. Can my hon. Friend the Minister guarantee that?

Asked by
Steve Witherden (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
17 March 2026
Reference
782 c736
House
House of Commons

As my hon. Friend knows, this is a matter for the Home Secretary. If my hon. Friend seeks parliamentary time for a debate, he should come to business questions on Thursday morning.

Answered by
Jake Richards (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
17 March 2026
Reference
782 c736
House
House of Commons

Clearly, the Home Secretary has the power to ban marches but no power to deal with static protests. This weekend we had the annual al-Quds hate demonstration, at which individuals regularly chanted antisemitic slogans, but the police could take no action. Will the Minister have discussions with the Home Secretary on what can be done to police and ban static demonstrations that will clearly lead to a contravention of the law? The big problem in London is that police are being sucked into the centre of the city and taken away from the boroughs where they should be doing their policing work.

Asked by
Bob Blackman (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
17 March 2026
Reference
782 c736
House
House of Commons

The hon. Member raises an important point, as I know he has repeatedly in the past, and I will raise the issue with the Home Office. I put on record that the incidents of antisemitism we saw over the weekend were wholly disgraceful, and this Government will do everything we can to stamp them out.

Answered by
Jake Richards (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
17 March 2026
Reference
782 c736
House
House of Commons

The Government’s relentless clampdown on the right to protest has been disgraceful. However, the High Court’s ruling that the proscription of Palestine Action was unlawful is a victory for the National Council for Civil Liberties, which is now challenging policies that suppress and criminalise peaceful protesters. Does the Minister agree with me that our so-called justice system is being weaponised to intimidate and shut down legitimate protests, and that this Government’s assault on our fundamental right to protest has failed?

Asked by
Kim Johnson (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
17 March 2026
Reference
782 c737
House
House of Commons

No, I do not agree with my hon. Friend on that point. The Home Secretary has been very clear that that judgment will be appealed in the courts. We have been absolutely clear as a Government that the right to peaceful protest is a vital part of our democracy, but those rights are balanced, and it is crucial that, where peaceful protest contravenes the law, the law stands firm.

Answered by
Jake Richards (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
17 March 2026
Reference
782 c737
House
House of Commons

People should have the right to protest, but that needs to be coupled with responsibilities. As my hon. Friend the Member for Harrow East (Bob Blackman) mentioned, it is outrageous that fringe groups feel emboldened to protest in support of terrorist ideology, contrary to basic British values. What steps is the Department taking to ensure that these people are under no illusion about how they will end up being prosecuted if they openly support fundamentalist Islamist ideology, and that if they have no right to be here, they will be deported?

Asked by
Peter Bedford (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
17 March 2026
Reference
782 c737
House
House of Commons

As I have said, this is a matter for the Home Secretary. She has made it abundantly clear that, although there is a right to protest in this country—an important right that should be protected—where incidents such as those the hon. Gentleman has identified occur, those individuals should face the full force of the law.

Answered by
Jake Richards (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
17 March 2026
Reference
782 c737
House
House of Commons

What discussions he has had with the Secretary of State for the Home Department on protecting the right to protest.

Asked by
Steve Witherden (Labour)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
17 March 2026
Reference
908325; 782 cc736-7
House
House of Commons

Statement on public order.

Department
Home Office
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
782 cc346-358
House
House of Commons

With your permission, Mr Speaker, I will make a statement on public order.

The Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, Sir Mark Rowley, has requested a prohibition on processions relating to al-Quds Day under section 13 of the Public Order Act 1986. I have consented to that request, placing a ban on...

Member
Shabana Mahmood (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
782 cc346-7
House
House of Commons

I fully support a ban on this march. The police assessment of the risk is right, and, in fact, I wrote to the commissioner a week ago urging for exactly this ban. However, the problems with the al-Quds march go beyond simply the risk of serious disorder. In 2024, 10...

Member
Chris Philp (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
782 cc347-3
House
House of Commons

I thank the shadow Home Secretary for his comments and his questions. He began by talking about some of the unacceptable acts of violence and incitement to violence that have taken place at various marches, not just marches relating to al-Quds Day. It is not unusual for multiple arrests to...

Member
Shabana Mahmood (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
782 cc349-350
House
House of Commons

I welcome the Secretary of State’s decision to ban this weekend’s al-Quds march. Al-Quds was founded by the ayatollah 40 years ago. It has repeatedly featured support for the Iranian regime and terrorist groups, and often promotes dangerous antisemitism too. Given the growing threat to Jewish communities across the UK,...

Member
Mark Sewards (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
782 c350
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend will know that the IRGC is already sanctioned in its entirety. As I say, we do not comment on matters relating to proscription, but we have accepted the recommendations made by Jonathan Hall KC. The Government will take those forward at the earliest available opportunity.

Member
Shabana Mahmood (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 March 2026
Reference
782 c350
House
House of Commons