Skip to main content

1-20 of 77 results for subject:Email

Session X
2026-27

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs, whether Lord Mandelson was fully off-boarded in relation to any government information held on his non-corporate devices and emails when he left Crown Service.

Asked by
Mike Wood (Conservative)
Answering body
Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
20617
House
House of Commons

Moved by

Lord Coaker

38: After Clause 36, insert the following new Clause—

“Service of notices by email

(1) RFA 1996 is amended as follows.

(2) In section 32 (call out of persons who have entered into special arrangements)—

(a) after subsection (6) insert—

“(6A) A notice under this section may also be served on a person...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc578-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, government Amendments 38 and 39 in my name are needed to make improvements to the Bill.

Amendment 38 makes a simple but important modernising change. It will allow formal call-out and recall notices for reservists to be sent electronically, in addition to the existing postal route, ensuring that our...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c579
House
House of Lords

My Lords, briefly, this is a very sensible amendment and I support it. In the world in which we now live, and with the way in which we communicate with one another, are there people in our Armed Forces already thinking ahead to different, more urgent ways of being in...

Member
Viscount Stansgate (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c579
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I agree with the noble Viscount, Lord Stansgate, that these government amendments are limited and make perfect sense. Sending notices by email makes sense. I would be concerned about formal communications being sent necessarily by forms of social media, but, equally, it would be sensible for His Majesty’s...

Member
Baroness Smith of Newnham (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c579
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not have too much to say on this group of two government amendments, so I will keep it brief.

I understand entirely why the Government wish to allow call-out notices to be sent by email. The Minister has given us an excellent explanation of their rationale, and...

Member
Earl of Minto (Conservative; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc579-580
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Earl, Lord Minto, the noble Baroness, Lady Smith, and the noble Viscount, Lord Stansgate, for their questions about this simple change. Of course, as with everything as we go through this Bill, I will look into all the various points that have been made.

My...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc580-1
House
House of Lords

Can I just confirm that we are talking about something in addition to, rather than instead of?

Member
Earl of Minto (Conservative; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c581
House
House of Lords

It is whichever is the most appropriate to use.

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c581
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Coaker

39: Schedule 5, page 129, line 28, leave out “fourth” and insert “third”

Member's explanatory statement

This amendment makes a drafting correction.

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c581
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise to oppose the question that Clause 38 and Schedule 6 stand part of the Bill. These provisions would abolish the 13 reserve forces and cadets associations and the Council of Reserve Forces and Cadets Associations and replace them with a single, new, national, non-departmental public body.

I...

Member
Earl of Minto (Conservative; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc582-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I strongly support the purpose of opposing Clause 38 standing part. The PAC’s 43rd report of 2024-25 heavily criticised the MoD for inadequacies in its financial oversight of the RFCAs. The report said:

“The Department’s arrangements for monitoring and reporting on the RFCAs’ financial performance are inadequate”

and they

“fall below...

Member
Lord Craig of Radley (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc583-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is an honour to follow the noble and gallant Lord. I rise to support my noble friends and speak in opposition to Clause 38 standing part of the Bill.

I am always keen to champion improvements in governance. In the case of the Reserve Forces and cadets’ associations,...

Member
Baroness Fraser of Craigmaddie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc585-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, let me start by saying that I agree with everything that has been said so far. I have put my name to some amendments in subsequent groupings that seek to ameliorate some of the worst aspects of Schedule 6, where I think the Government have got it badly...

Member
Lord Stirrup (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc586-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a pleasure and honour to follow the several noble Lords, including two noble and gallant Lords, who have already spoken; of course, they have tremendous expertise. I also thank the noble Baroness, Lady Fraser, because she made a point that is very important for the more...

Member
Lord Moore of Etchingham (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc587-8
House
House of Lords

I am glad that the noble Lord, Lord Moore, thinks there is some intellectual coherence in the Government’s approach to regionalisation, given that in the last 24 hours, they have abandoned large swathes of it, including in my part of the world. However, I understand and take on board what...

Member
Lord Swire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc588-9
House
House of Lords

I begin by apologising to my noble friend the Minister, for whom I have the highest regard. I fear that what I am about to say may not be the most welcome contribution to this debate. I do not know half as much about this as the many noble and...

Member
Viscount Stansgate (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c589
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am chairman of the current Council of the Reserve Forces’ and Cadets’ Associations, and I am extremely grateful to my noble friends for tabling these clause stand part notices. Since the Haldane reforms of the early-20th century, most recently renewed in the Reserve Forces Act 1996, to...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc589-591
House
House of Lords

I too support this amendment. I took part in the debate initiated by the noble Lord, Lord De Mauley, in January 2020 when it appeared that the then Government were leaning towards adopting the recommendation that now appears from the Sullivan report. All the Back-Bench speakers on that occasion were...

Member
Lord Faulks (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 cc590-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I intend to speak to further amendments in this general area later today, and I do not wish to repeat the sensible arguments that noble Lords and noble and gallant Lords have already made as far as this matter is concerned. However, it seems to me that, with...

Member
Lord Dannatt (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 September 2026
Reference
859 c592
House
House of Lords