Skip to main content

1-20 of 158 results for subject:Subscriptions

Subject X
Channel Four Television

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Channel Four Television (158)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport, what assessment she has made of the implications for her policies of Netflix’s loss of 200,000 subscribers and more than 35 per cent fall in market value in the first quarter of 2022 compared with Channel 4’s streaming...

Asked by
Chris Elmore (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
25 April 2022
Reference
157485
House
House of Commons

My Lords, the Minister kindly accepted my previous amendment, which limited the purpose for which technical obligations could be imposed. Dare I hope that he will be equally as receptive to my amendment in this group? Amendment 78 seeks to ensure that Clause 11 is genuinely used only as a...

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1479-80
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is an interesting idea which, theoretically anyhow, we should consider very seriously. I hope the Minister will do so.

Member
Baroness Howe of Idlicote (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1459
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall speak also to Amendment 120A. First, I apologise for the slightly artificial introduction of this amendment at this point in the proceedings. The use of a paving amendment, Amendment 120A, at this juncture is simply a result of the desire of the signatories to the amendment...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1455-8
House
House of Lords

87: Clause 13, page 15, line 16, at end insert— "( ) that those provisions do not have a significant adverse effect on legitimate users;"

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1487
House
House of Lords

I add my support to the amendment of the noble Lord, Lord Puttnam. As I said earlier when I made a request to include quality as a requirement, we all have an interest in the maintenance of impartial news programmes. Plurality, which we believe in, must go hand in hand...

Member
Baroness Bonham-Carter of Yarnbury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1507
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am not sure I can agree with the noble Baroness, Lady Bonham-Carter. After all, Channel 4, although publicly owned, is unlike the BBC, not publicly funded. I would therefore have expected that, in the current economic climate, where all media dependent on advertising revenue are going through...

Member
Lord Gordon of Strathblane (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1503
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is time for me to wind up. This has been a very serious debate and I thank all noble Lords who have taken part. I thank particularly the Conservative Benches, both Front and Back, for their support for the amendment. It is greatly valued. The debate between...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1468
House
House of Lords

54: Clause 8, page 10, line 35, at end insert— "( ) that the code makes provision to ensure subscribers do not incur any cost in meeting their obligations under section 124A;"

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1453
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not have any problem with the sentiments behind the amendments. The only problem is that if those points are listed, it would look as though that is what the Government or Ofcom should give priority to, but they are only three of a myriad number of...

Member
Lord Gordon of Strathblane (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1516-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I absolutely agree with what has been said so far. This is one of the greatest eye-openers. As we have proceeded with this Bill—particularly as it has run parallel to the deliberations of the Select Committee which the noble Lord, Lord Fowler, is chairing so ably—we have come...

Member
Baroness Howe of Idlicote (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1516
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I congratulate my noble friend on the amendment—I am now rowing back frantically—on a very important issue. It is so important, in fact, that the Select Committee on Communications is currently engaged in an inquiry on precisely this—the digital switchover—although a number of reasons have been adduced as...

Member
Lord Fowler (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1516
House
House of Lords

My Lords, what is the role of a Minister when friends fall out in the Opposition? The noble Lord, Lord Fowler, has articulated an important case that emerged from his committee and which we have taken seriously. It is not a question of falling out among friends but of different...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1513-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am the chairman of the Select Committee on Communications which made the proposal that the Government are acting upon, so I do not intend to jump overboard at this point. I believe it is a sensible proposal, and I will continue to support it. I understand what...

Member
Lord Fowler (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1513
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord, Lord De Mauley, made his point extremely eloquently, and it leaves me fairly conflicted. My experience of 20 years at Anglia Television makes me realise how difficult it is to create a financial model that works in this area. I thought long and hard about something that...

Member
Lord Puttnam (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1512
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I commend the amendments, which are a very constructive way of seeking further assurance from the Minister. Indeed, they very much reflect the concerns that I expressed from these Benches in the Clause 30 stand part debate in Committee. Assurances about the future of analogue radio in particular...

Member
Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1515
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I tabled Amendments 137 and 138 again simply to get more detail from the Minister, as his assurances about these points were not wholly convincing. The amendments would give the Government an explicit requirement to take into account the views of radio listeners and local and community stations....

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1515
House
House of Lords

137: Clause 30, page 36, line 33, after "to" insert— "(a) "

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1515
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank my noble friend Lord Fowler and the noble Lords, Lord Gordon and Lord Puttnam, for their contributions. I respect and appreciate their views. These things are not easy, as the noble Lord, Lord Puttnam, acknowledged. Noble Lords were generous to appreciate our preference for a commercially...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1515
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to all noble Lords who have spoken in this short debate, particularly the right reverend Prelate the Bishop of Manchester and my noble friend Lord Gordon, for identifying the weaknesses of the amendment and the nature of the issue on which the Government need to...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2010
Reference
717 c1517-8
House
House of Lords