Skip to main content

1-20 of 519 results for subject:Iraq

Subject X
Hussein, Saddam

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

No. I said I will give way in a few moments, after I have set out my argument. The time to focus on an official inquiry is when the troops come home to safety, not when they are still exposed to danger in Iraq. Precedent supports this, and so does...

Member
David Miliband (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2009
Reference
490 c322-3
House
House of Commons

Absolutely. A series of dossiers and bits of information were produced for the benefit of Members of Parliament and the media. Who can forget the map produced by the Evening Standard, which indicated that just about everybody was under an immediate and ever-present threat of attack by Iraq? Who can...

Member
Jeremy Corbyn (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2009
Reference
490 c348-50
House
House of Commons

The Foreign Secretary mentioned the operations of the British forces in Iraq. Can he say how many personnel, based in Iraq, London or elsewhere, would be involved in any inquiry? What would be the problem with replacing those people so that they were free to engage in an inquiry now?

Member
Ed Davey (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2009
Reference
490 c327
House
House of Commons

The Minister knows that I voted against the war and that I want to see an inquiry. Is there not a way out of the timing problem that he is putting to the House? The inquiry will take some time, so could we not split it? Part of the inquiry...

Member
Mark Fisher (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2009
Reference
490 c365
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend has put that argument to me privately and he now puts it to me publicly. I do not believe that there is a case for splitting the inquiry into two halves. We need a group of people to sit down and seriously to consider the issues in...

Member
Bob Ainsworth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2009
Reference
490 c365-6
House
House of Commons

Iraq War Inquiry. Ninth opposition day debate (part 1). Motion negatived on division (303 to 265). Amendment agreed on division (301 to 265).

Lead member
Lord Hague of Richmond
Answering member
David Miliband
Department
Ministry of Defence; Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Opposition days
Date
25 March 2009
Reference
490 c312-74
House
House of Commons

I will not detain the House for long. I would like to deal with the issue of why we need an inquiry into the Iraq war, and why it is so important. As we know, and has been said by the hon. Member for Islington, North (Jeremy Corbyn) and many...

Member
Angus Brendan MacNeil (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2009
Reference
490 c350-2
House
House of Commons

What I am saying may be relevant to that. We do not know what an inquiry will say. However, I think that there are grounds for concern about the way in which Government have made important decisions about national security in recent years. Certainly, it appears from recent deliberations about...

Member
Lord Hague of Richmond (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2009
Reference
490 c316-7
House
House of Commons

I am most grateful to my right hon. Friend. Is not the point that he is making particularly relevant to the conduct of Government policy in Afghanistan? It is being conducted by a Cabinet Committee that meets once a fortnight, rather than the whole Government being engaged in the effort.

Member
Bernard Jenkin (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2009
Reference
490 c316
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is absolutely right. That is a reason for an inquiry. It appears from what has been said and written about the aftermath of the invasion of Iraq that the Department for International Development was indeed not ready to follow up what other Government agencies, and the Army,...

Member
Lord Hague of Richmond (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2009
Reference
490 c317
House
House of Commons

Will my right hon. Friend join me in congratulating 7th Armoured Brigade, who did a fantastic job in moving into Basra during the invasion and creating a relative peace? What happened then was that they looked over their shoulders expecting some form of stabilisation and reconstruction plan, and there was...

Member
Tobias Ellwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2009
Reference
490 c317
House
House of Commons

Yes, my hon. Friend makes one important analogy, which is very attractive to us as it involves the downfall of a Prime Minister. Come to think of it, that idea is probably quite attractive to the Foreign Secretary. There are closer analogies, which I will come to in a moment....

Member
Lord Hague of Richmond (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2009
Reference
490 c313-4
House
House of Commons

Did my right hon. Friend note that, at the beginning of the debate, there were only eight Labour MPs present not on the Front Bench, including the Parliamentary Private Secretary? Does that show that Labour MPs are ashamed of their Government's position? Does the absence of the Leader of the...

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2009
Reference
490 c314
House
House of Commons

I do not think that those on the Government Benches now take enormous pride in the Government's position. Indeed, the variants on this motion that I have tabled in recent years were defeated only by quite narrow majorities, given the balance of parties in the House. I am sure that...

Member
Lord Hague of Richmond (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2009
Reference
490 c314-5
House
House of Commons

Is not my right hon. Friend's point reinforced by the wording that the Government have chosen for their amendment, which talks not about the return of our troops, but says that it would be inappropriate to have an inquiry""whilst important operations are underway in Iraq to support the people and...

Member
Malcolm Rifkind (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2009
Reference
490 c315
House
House of Commons

As usual, my right hon. and learned Friend is absolutely on the nail. I have pointed out how the Government have retreated from one argument to another. It may be the next stage of the retreat to argue that an inquiry cannot begin even when the troops are safely home,...

Member
Lord Hague of Richmond (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2009
Reference
490 c315-6
House
House of Commons

I shall sweep across the Chamber, starting with my hon. Friend the Member for North Essex (Mr. Jenkin).

Member
Lord Hague of Richmond (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2009
Reference
490 c316
House
House of Commons

That is absolutely right, and it is a point that I have made in at least one of the previous debates, and the hon. Gentleman may have made it, too. Yes, it is now six years since the start of the conflict, which is longer than the duration of the...

Member
Lord Hague of Richmond (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2009
Reference
490 c313
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman makes reference to the passage of time. He will, of course, be aware that the passage of time since March 2003 is equivalent to or greater than that of world war two.

Member
Angus Brendan MacNeil (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2009
Reference
490 c313
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,"That this House welcomes the Prime Minister's announcement of 18 December 2008 that a fundamental change in the British forces' mission in Iraq will occur by 31 May 2009 at the latest and that at that point the rapid withdrawal of the British troops will take place,...

Member
Lord Hague of Richmond (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 March 2009
Reference
490 c312
House
House of Commons