Skip to main content

1-20 of 328 results for subject:Separation

Subject X
Mediation

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Mediation (328)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Letter dated 30/04/2024 from Lord Bellamy to Lord Farmer and others regarding issues raised in the debate on parental separation: family justice system costs, parenting programmes, statutory time-limit requirements, the Pathfinder project, judicial training and judicial decisions around domestic abuse, and potential mediation voucher scheme. 2p.

Deposited by
Ministry of Justice
Type
Deposited papers
Date
30 April 2024
Reference
DEP2024-0469
House
House of Lords

Lords question for short debate on what steps they are taking to support parents considering separation, and to promote early resolution of private family law arrangements.

Lead member
Lord Farmer
Answering member
Lord Bellamy
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Questions for short debate
Date
22 April 2024
Reference
837 cc1343-1357
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all noble Lords contributing to what I consider an important debate this evening. I will not soft-pedal why we are discussing these issues: parental separation is an enormous and egregious problem, the scale and ramifications of which few seem ready to acknowledge. Parental separation is a...

Member
Lord Farmer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2024
Reference
837 cc1343-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I congratulate the noble Lord, Lord Farmer, on securing this debate, and it is a pleasure to follow him.

I have been involved in this area in various guises since my time as chief executive of Relate, as a former chair of Cafcass, and as chair of the Lords...

Member
Baroness Tyler of Enfield (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2024
Reference
837 cc1345-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Farmer, for calling this debate. I am quite disappointed that so few people are here to speak on such an important issue.

I welcome the Government’s reform to help families resolve disputes faster and protect children from lengthy court cases. The programme of...

Member
Baroness Meyer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2024
Reference
837 cc1346-1350
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the noble Lord, Lord Farmer, for bringing this debate on this important matter. As I hope noble Lords will know, the Archbishops’ Commission on Families and Households—with which I know the noble Lord was engaged—looked at this subject closely. It is out of this...

Member
Bishop of Derby (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2024
Reference
837 cc1350-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise to speak in the gap having heard what has been a powerful and interesting debate—short on numbers but strong

on substance. I have a very narrow point to make. On the general debate, the connection between cause and effect is very difficult to establish in this...

Member
Lord Davies of Brixton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2024
Reference
837 cc1351-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I first thank the noble Lord, Lord Farmer, for tabling this short debate. As my noble friend Lord Davies said, it has been a very interesting and well-informed debate. Secondly, I thank the noble and learned Lord, Lord Bellamy, for facilitating my recent visit to Bournemouth, where I...

Member
Lord Ponsonby of Shulbrede (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2024
Reference
837 cc1352-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, few subjects can be more important than the one we are discussing this evening, and I rather doubt my ability to do justice to everything that has been said in the 12 minutes allotted to me. I thank my noble friend Lord Farmer for his opening remarks and...

Member
Lord Bellamy (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 April 2024
Reference
837 cc1354-7
House
House of Lords

Motion that this House has considered the terminology used in family law. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Siobhan Baillie
Answering member
Mike Freer
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates
Date
16 November 2022
Reference
722 cc287-292WH
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House has considered the terminology used in family law.

It is a pleasure to serve under your chairmanship, Ms Nokes, not least as I know you are a huge champion of families, and when you looked after relationship work in the Department for Work and Pensions...

Member
Siobhan Baillie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 November 2022
Reference
722 c288WH
House
House of Commons

In the time I have had the privilege of knowing the hon. Lady, she has addressed these issues with a deep interest and knowledge, and I thank her for that. In children and family courts, children often hear big and complicated words without knowing their meaning, but they know the...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 November 2022
Reference
722 c288WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Member for Strangford for what was, as usual, a thoughtful intervention. He is absolutely right. The language we all use, whether it is in the media or in the legal system and court documents, can be changed. It will not be easy—we all use terminology that...

Member
Siobhan Baillie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 November 2022
Reference
722 cc289-290WH
House
House of Commons

As a former magistrate in the family proceedings court, I completely agree that when people come for contact arrangements with their children, very often the magistrates are acting in the role of mediator and helping them to come to a decision in the court. Does my hon. Friend agree that...

Member
Sally-Ann Hart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 November 2022
Reference
722 c290WH
House
House of Commons

I agree. It is not a good use of magistrates’ time, either. This is not easy for parents—nobody should suggest that they rush to court, because often that is not the case. At the moment, parents think that court is the only place to go to get disputes resolved. That...

Member
Siobhan Baillie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 November 2022
Reference
722 c290WH
House
House of Commons

I agree with what the hon. Lady is saying. The problem is that there are insufficient resources in mediation services, but if we invested in them, we could make savings further down the road within the court system and the Ministry of Justice. Is that something she would encourage?

Member
Alex Cunningham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 November 2022
Reference
722 c290WH
House
House of Commons

It is absolutely fantastic to hear the hon. Gentleman talk about mediation. There has actually been a lot of investment in mediation. The demand went up an awful lot when we had a voucher system, which we may hear about from the Minister. Where demand has gone up, we need...

Member
Siobhan Baillie (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 November 2022
Reference
722 cc290-1WH
House
House of Commons

As ever, it is a joy to serve with you in the Chair, Ms Nokes. I thank my hon. Friend the Member for Stroud (Siobhan Baillie) for securing a debate on this important topic. It is a topic on which I know she has campaigned for quite some time and...

Member
Mike Freer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 November 2022
Reference
722 cc291-4WH
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Justice, what plans he has to reduce the number of separation and divorce proceedings that end up in the family court system; and what steps he is taking to increase the use of mediation services.

Asked by
Mark Jenkinson (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
16 July 2021
Reference
29911
House
House of Commons

Committee stage. Clause 1, discussed with amendments, new clauses 1 to 6 and 9, clauses 2 to 9, and the schedule to the Bill. Clause 1 agreed to. Clauses 2 to 8 agreed to. Government amendment made to clause 9, with the clause agreed to as amended. New clause 1...

Lead member
Robert Buckland; Alex Chalk
Answering member
Alex Cunningham
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on bills; Committee of the Whole House (HC)
Date
17 June 2020
Reference
677 cc845-906
House
House of Commons