Skip to main content

1-20 of 204 results for subject:Playgrounds

Subject X
Charging points

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Charging points (204)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2025
Reference
768 c687
House
House of Commons

I know lots of Members wish to contribute to the debate but I will make some progress. If I may finish the argument I am trying develop about taking on those misconceptions, I will give way to the hon. Member for North Herefordshire (Ellie Chowns) very shortly.

We have been perfectly...

Member
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2025
Reference
768 c687
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister warmly for giving way. He dismissed “spurious” criticism of part 3 of the Bill, but would he use that phrase to dismiss the very expert criticism of the Office for Environmental Protection? In complete contrast to the Secretary of the State’s claim that the Bill does...

Member
Ellie Chowns (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2025
Reference
768 c687
House
House of Commons

The simple answer is no, I would not characterise the OEP’s advice as “spurious”, but I am characterising some of the arguments that have been made over recent days and weeks as such. The OEP is not saying that the Bill is a “cash to trash” model, but some people...

Member
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2025
Reference
768 c687
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Ellie Chowns (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2025
Reference
768 c687
House
House of Commons

I will not give way again. We have to make this argument to take on the critics of the Bill who are intentionally trying to malign the objectives—

Member
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2025
Reference
768 c687
House
House of Commons

On that point, will the Minister give way?

Member
Gideon Amos (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2025
Reference
768 c688
House
House of Commons

I will not. I have just been very clear that I am not going to give way again as I want to make some progress.

Member
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2025
Reference
768 c688
House
House of Commons

rose—

Member
Ellie Chowns (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2025
Reference
768 c688
House
House of Commons

The hon. Member for North Herefordshire is more than welcome to have another go at intervening in due course. I know that she will be putting forward her views later. The Government’s view is that the Bill is not “regressive”. As I have said, environmental delivery plans will secure improved...

Member
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2025
Reference
768 cc688-9
House
House of Commons

I find it remarkable that the Minister repeatedly accused the over 30 leading environmental groups, including the Royal Society for the Protection of Birds, which has described the Bill as a “cash to trash” model, as making “spurious” remarks, given that he quoted the chief executive of the RSPB, Beccy...

Member
Carla Denyer (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2025
Reference
768 c689
House
House of Commons

It is for the chief executive of the RSPB to justify why she has changed her view on the Bill when the Bill has not changed. If anything, as I will come on to explain, quite a lot of amendments that the Government made—

Member
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2025
Reference
768 c689
House
House of Commons

I was not planning to, Madam Deputy Speaker, because I need to set out some important changes that the Government have made and the amendments that we are proposing. However, on the basis of your stricture, I will not take any further interventions.

The Bill has not changed; if anything, it...

Member
Matthew Pennycook (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2025
Reference
768 cc689-691
House
House of Commons

I thought I just spoke once at the end.

Member
Paul Holmes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2025
Reference
768 c691
House
House of Commons

Actually, I will say a few words. Why resist the temptation to say a few things?

I thank the Minister for his hard work in leading the Planning and Infrastructure Public Bill Committee and all Members who served on that Committee over the past few weeks. He spent a long time...

Member
Paul Holmes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2025
Reference
768 c692
House
House of Commons

I agree with the hon. Gentleman that local communities should have much more control over what happens to the housing stock in their areas. Will he reflect on his party’s opposition so far to the proposal from the Liberal Democrats for a different category of planning use for both short-term...

Member
Tim Farron (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2025
Reference
768 c692
House
House of Commons

The Conservative party has always believed in the rights of locally elected councillors and planning committees to make decisions for the people they serve; we have said that consistently through the passage of this Bill. The hon. Member for Taunton and Wellington (Gideon Amos) has tabled new clause 1 to...

Member
Paul Holmes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2025
Reference
768 c692
House
House of Commons

Does my hon. Friend agree that our constituents expect to have their voice heard on a local planning committee? Provided that councils are well-trained, the system that we have is working quite well.

Member
Wendy Morton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2025
Reference
768 c692
House
House of Commons

Oh, is it?

Member
Chris Curtis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2025
Reference
768 c692
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman says, “Is it?” from a sedentary position, but I absolutely agree with my right hon. Friend. Very few planning applications are refused by planning committees, and very few planning applications do not go through because of the actions of planning committees. We on the Opposition Benches happen...

Member
Paul Holmes (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
9 June 2025
Reference
768 c692
House
House of Commons