Skip to main content

1-20 of 640 results for subject:Funerals

Subject X
Coronavirus

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Coronavirus (640)
More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords question for short debate on, following the COVID-19 Day of Reflection, what steps they are taking to improve support offered to people bereaved as a result of COVID-19.

Lead member
Bishop of London
Answering member
Baroness Merron
Department
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Questions for short debate
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 cc1392-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I declare my interest as the former chair of the UK Commission on Bereavement and other interests as set out in the register. Though we are small in number, I am grateful for the opportunity to hold this debate. I am aware that reflection on the impact of...

Member
Bishop of London (Bishops (affiliation); Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 cc1399-1401
House
House of Lords

I congratulate the right reverend Prelate the Bishop of London on securing this important topical debate and on her excellent introduction to the very wide range of issues contained in it. I shall divide my time into two areas: first, bereavement support to people since Covid but not only because...

Member
Baroness Brinton (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 cc1400-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the right reverend Prelate the Bishop of London for securing this debate on this important matter. I thank her and the noble Baroness, Lady Brinton, for their moving remarks about the lessons they feel we ought to learn.

Listening to the moving opening remarks from the right...

Member
Lord Kamall (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 cc1403-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I too congratulate the right reverend Prelate on securing this important and touching debate, which was somewhat inevitable, considering the subject. I acknowledge her ongoing dedication. Since chairing the UK Commission on Bereavement and the publication of the report, the right reverend Prelate and the commission have continued...

Member
Baroness Merron (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 March 2025
Reference
844 cc1405-1395
House
House of Lords

Letter dated 09/05/2022 from Heather Wheeler MP to John Hayes MP regarding the Westminster Hall debate on the Covid-19 Inquiry: consultation with the death care sector. 1p.

Deposited by
Cabinet Office
Type
Deposited papers
Date
9 May 2022
Reference
DEP2022-0399
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Secretary Matt Hancock
Department
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Statutory instruments
Notes
This Statutory Instrument corrects errors in S.I. 2020/592 and 2021/364.
Date
15 June 2021
Reference
SI 2021/705
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

Motion to consider. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Jo Churchill
Answering member
Justin Madders
Department
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Debates on delegated legislation; Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings
Committee
Second Delegated Legislation Committee
Date
14 June 2021
House
House of Commons

To ask the Minister for the Cabinet Office, what discussions he has had with relevant stakeholders on determining the number of attendees allowed at a wedding ceremony by how many people the venue can safely accommodate and not a numerical limit in line with funeral restrictions during the covid-19 outbreak.

Asked by
Andrew Rosindell (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
28 May 2021
Reference
4553
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Health and Social Care, how many requests the covid-19 quarantine exemptions team receives on average each day; what proportion of those requests relate to (a) seeing dying relatives and (b) funerals; whether requests for exemption are triaged based on urgency; and what the...

Asked by
Tanmanjeet Singh Dhesi (Labour)
Answering body
Department of Health and Social Care
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
27 May 2021
Reference
3112
House
House of Commons

For what reason the CPS decided not to prosecute the organiser of a large funeral held in breach of covid-19 regulations in Kettering in November 2020.

Asked by
Philip Hollobone (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
20 May 2021
Reference
900283; 695 cc865-6
House
House of Commons

I understand my hon. Friend’s concern about this issue, which he has already brought to my attention. The CPS makes its charging decisions independently, with every case judged on its own merit, based on the tests set out in the code. In this particular case, my understanding is that the CPS reviewed it and determined that there was insufficient evidence to continue with the proceedings. That was because there was no evidence that the suspect was responsible for the excess numbers present outside the church.

Answered by
Lucy Frazer (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
20 May 2021
Reference
695 c866
House
House of Commons

There is widespread dismay and outrage in Kettering that the organiser of that huge Irish Traveller funeral, held during the covid lockdown, has in effect got away with it. Clearly, however, the Crown Prosecution Service cannot successfully prosecute on any criminal case unless it is provided by the police with sufficient formal evidence against the accused. Given that the court hearing was held five months after the funeral took place, will the Solicitor General confirm when the CPS received the case file from the police?

Asked by
Philip Hollobone (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
20 May 2021
Reference
695 c866
House
House of Commons

I understand the concern of my hon. Friend’s constituents, as of many around the country who are abiding by the rules, which is what has managed to get our infection rates down. To answer his specific question, the first hearing was at the Northampton magistrates court on 19 April. The police had not previously sent the file through to the CPS due to a technical error on the part of the police. The file was received at 11.30 am on the morning of the hearing.

Answered by
Lucy Frazer (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
20 May 2021
Reference
695 c866
House
House of Commons

My Lords, these regulations were laid on 7 April. It is ironic that we are discussing them today, as we start moving to step 3. If they had been discussed earlier, the facts on 9 April might have been raised to help us keep all local areas safer. On 9...

Member
Lord Scriven (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 May 2021
Reference
812 cc4-5GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for his thorough introduction to these regulations. These amendments were necessary at the time, and therefore need approval, albeit retrospectively, as we go into step 3 of the journey. But journeys are rarely irreversible, and the road map may at some stage, at least...

Member
Baroness Wheatcroft (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 May 2021
Reference
812 cc5-6GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, today signals a historic move in the Government’s approach to tackling the Covid-19 epidemic—a significant move away from detailed government regulation and restrictions; a return to personal responsibility; a renewed emphasis on individual choice; and an “up to you to decide” policy rather than the Government legislating over...

Member
Lord Moynihan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 May 2021
Reference
812 cc9-10GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, nothing I shall say to the Minister is addressed personally to him; he is not in charge of this.

On 21 April, a devastating report was published by the Hansard Society and the Constitution Unit about the marginalisation of the House of Commons under Covid. Although it was specific...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 May 2021
Reference
812 cc6-7GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is of great concern that we are moving today not to step 2 but to step 3 of the road map, while the more transmissible Indian variant is spreading—Professor Whitty expects it to become predominant in the UK. I make no apology for repeating the concerns of...

Member
Baroness Walmsley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 May 2021
Reference
812 c7GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is a great pleasure to follow the noble Baroness, Lady Walmsley, who has made some extremely important points. I thank my noble friend for setting out the purport of these regulations, applaud his work ethic and say that what I shall say, just as the noble Lord,...

Member
Lord Bourne of Aberystwyth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 May 2021
Reference
812 cc7-8GC
House
House of Lords