Skip to main content

1-20 of 199 results for subject:Walking

Subject X
Coronavirus

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Coronavirus (199)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

A Westminster Hall debate on the ‘Future funding of urban transport’ has been scheduled for Thursday 31 March 2022 from 1.30-3pm. The debate has been initiated by Clive Betts MP.

Type
Commons Debate packs
Date
30 March 2022
Reference
CDP-2022-0073
Laid by
Secretary Michael Gove
Department
Department for Levelling Up, Housing and Communities
Type
Select Committee reports (Government responses); Command papers
Date
23 March 2022
Reference
CP 630
House
House of Lords; House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Levelling Up, Housing and Communities Committee
Date
1 December 2021
Reference
HC 37 2021-22
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what plans he has to encourage commuters to walk, cycle and use public transport as covid-19 restrictions are eased.

Asked by
Charlotte Nichols (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
29 June 2021
Reference
19719
House
House of Commons

To ask the Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster and Minister for the Cabinet Office, whether he has made an assessment of the potential merits of allowing cemeteries to remain accessible during the November 2020 covid-19 lockdown to provide connecting footpaths for recreational walking in (a) inner city areas where...

Asked by
Clive Betts (Labour)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
19 November 2020
Reference
115473
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Transport, what assessment he has made of the effectiveness of walking, cycling and local traffic reduction schemes delivered under Tranche 1 of the Emergency Active Travel Fund; and what progress he has made in distributing Tranche 2 funding.

Asked by
Selaine Saxby (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Transport
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 November 2020
Reference
109755
House
House of Commons

Agreed to on question

Lead member
Rupa Huq
Answering member
Baroness Maclean of Redditch
Department
Department for Transport
Type
Adjournment debates
Date
4 November 2020
Reference
683 cc436-446
House
House of Commons

Travel and transport are what keep our capital going, and they produced its suburbs. When we add the covid emergency into the mix, however, questions are raised about the disproportionate numbers of black and ethnic minority people and transport workers who died earlier in the pandemic, at a time when...

Member
Rupa Huq (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 November 2020
Reference
683 cc437-8
House
House of Commons

Does the hon. Lady agree that a number of the changes that have been made have had a really negative impact on the taxi trade? The licensed taxi is one of the most accessible forms of transport. If we block it out of key routes such as Bishopsgate, we make...

Member
Theresa Villiers (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 November 2020
Reference
683 c438
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Lady makes a really good point. We have relied on cabbies—remember that taxi exam, the knowledge? That is completely invalidated by these changes. She makes a really powerful point. I think people feel discombobulated because these changes are so radical and dramatic, and they appear to have...

Member
Rupa Huq (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 November 2020
Reference
683 c438
House
House of Commons

I do not know whether the hon. Lady is more concerned about having been insufficiently enthusiastic in her mention of Stalin or having been too enthusiastic in bringing him up. In the context of low-traffic neighbourhoods, does she think that a good deal of consultation and discussion with the emergency...

Member
David Simmonds (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 November 2020
Reference
683 c438
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman speaks so much sense. We are at one on Heathrow—actually, I think all three of us who have spoken so far are—and he is right. In theory, these people are not allowed to express an opinion, so the leadership say, “Yeah, fine,” but the people who have...

Member
Rupa Huq (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 November 2020
Reference
683 c438
House
House of Commons

I am sure my hon. Friend is reflecting the views of some of her constituents, but does she share my concern that while we worry about sending car drivers around the long way, pedestrians have to walk a long way down the road to find a safe place to cross...

Member
Lilian Greenwood (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 November 2020
Reference
683 c438
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is right. Pedestrians often feel at the bottom of the food chain. Actually, walkers have contacted me saying that they have got nothing out of this. Cyclists have got new cycle lanes, but they seem to have been a bit forgotten in all this. I think the...

Member
Rupa Huq (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 November 2020
Reference
683 c439
House
House of Commons

Does the hon. Member agree with me that consultation is important, but what is also important is signage? One of my constituents approached me to say that the family drives every day from Kensington through the borough of Hammersmith and Fulham, and on the first day that one of these...

Member
Felicity Buchan (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 November 2020
Reference
683 c439
House
House of Commons

Goodness me, the hon. Lady tells a chilling story. In Ealing, at least initially, there are no fines—maybe I should not be saying that—so that people get used to it. There is a softly-softly approach. Ultimately, I guess that people do get used to it, but it seems wrong to...

Member
Rupa Huq (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 November 2020
Reference
683 c439
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for securing this important debate. I want to draw her attention to a recent report by the Institute of Race Relations called “The London Clearances”. This report found that regeneration projects are being used to actively dispossess working-class communities and low-income families of their homes....

Member
Apsana Begum (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 November 2020
Reference
683 c439
House
House of Commons

I thank my hon. Friend for a point that deserved to be made at length. She makes the point about the main roads, and those are people too. They feel two-tiered now: their house prices are probably lower, and they feel they have a raw deal because of the constant...

Member
Rupa Huq (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 November 2020
Reference
683 c440
House
House of Commons

Is not part of the problem the lack of consultation? Has not that been caused by the Government’s insistence that the schemes be implemented straightaway within an eight-week period, not allowing any consultation with communities or very limited consultation at best?

Member
Bambos Charalambous (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 November 2020
Reference
683 c440
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend speaks so much sense. It is true that it feels that this catastrophising, saying, “Emergency, emergency, we have to do it by the end of September”, with no time for consultation apart from six months later, is just the wrong way round, putting the cart before the...

Member
Rupa Huq (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 November 2020
Reference
683 c440
House
House of Commons