Skip to main content

1-20 of 507 results for subject:Dissolution

Subject X
Sunset clauses

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Sunset clauses (507)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for quoting my words from a different debate and I do not resile from a single word of that. None the less, I join my noble friends Lord Butler and Lord Pannick in hoping that the House will insist on this amendment,...

Member
Lord Armstrong of Ilminster (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 September 2011
Reference
730 c812-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, several noble Lords this evening have referred—somewhat kindly, I must say—to the report of the Constitution Committee, which I have the privilege to chair, on the process of constitutional change. The Minister was kind enough to refer to it in his opening remarks. I look forward to the...

Member
Baroness Jay of Paddington (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 September 2011
Reference
730 c815
House
House of Lords

I cannot understand why the Government could not have done the simple thing for this House, and for the integrity of our constitution, and simply said yes to this amendment. What on earth would the Government have lost by saying yes? They would have had the five-year Parliament that they,...

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 September 2011
Reference
730 c813-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am sorry, but the reality is it is not a fixed-term Parliament. Members were elected to a Parliament on the old system—quite a different matter.

Member
Lord Alderdice (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 September 2011
Reference
730 c821
House
House of Lords

I ask the noble Lord, through the Minister, whether it is therefore the Government’s position that all the arguments and discussions we had about no-confidence Motions—as they related historically and as they will, presumably, be affected under the fixed-term Parliament legislation—will not apply to this Parliament before 2015.

Member
Baroness Jay of Paddington (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 September 2011
Reference
730 c821
House
House of Lords

That is not the case, as we know. I was making the point that this Parliament was not elected as a fixed-term Parliament. I am sure if the noble Baroness thinks about it, she will appreciate this. The arguments, I recall, when we debated the benefits of four or five...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 September 2011
Reference
730 c821-2
House
House of Lords

I thank those who have taken part in this debate. I particularly say to the noble Lord, Lord Alderdice, that of course I accept that this is a disagreement—a disagreement on a very important constitutional matter, on which, I think, everybody agrees there has not been the normal preparation for...

Member
Lord Butler of Brockwell (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 September 2011
Reference
730 c822-3
House
House of Lords

I am about to conclude. It is important to make these points because I believe that the amendment that has been moved by the noble Lord, Lord Butler, affects the very heart of the Bill. That is why it is necessary for me to make these points. If the amendment...

Member
Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 September 2011
Reference
730 c816
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the Motion of my noble and learned friend the Minister. Before I explain in brief terms why I do so, I want to say how much respect I have for the noble Lord, Lord Butler of Brockwell. As I have said on previous occasions, he was...

Member
Baroness Stowell of Beeston (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 September 2011
Reference
730 c815-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, during the passage of this legislation it has been evident that the Government have been prepared to consider and, indeed, to support amendments which improve the provisions of the Bill. This Bill has been refined and improved by the scrutiny to which it has been subjected both in...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 September 2011
Reference
730 c806-9
House
House of Lords

That this House do not insist on its Amendments 1, 2 and 9, to which the Commons have insisted on their disagreement, and do agree with the Commons in their Amendment 9C in lieu. That this House do not insist on its Amendments 1, 2 and 9, to which the...

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 September 2011
Reference
730 c806
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will not take up your Lordships’ time by repeating the arguments for the sunset clause which noble Lords passed on two occasions before the Summer Recess, except to say to the Minister that it was a novelty to hear him accuse me of reintroducing politicking. I have...

Member
Lord Butler of Brockwell (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 September 2011
Reference
730 c809-10
House
House of Lords

Leave out from ““House”” to end and insert ““do insist on its Amendments 1, 2 and 9 and do disagree with the Commons in their Amendment 9C in lieu.””

Member
Lord Butler of Brockwell (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 September 2011
Reference
730 c809
House
House of Lords

While I appreciate the constructive response that the Minister gave to the proposals by this House to redraw Clause 2, I have to say that the Government’s response to the Motion spoken to so well today by the noble Lord, Lord Butler of Brockwell, is not only inadequate, it is...

Member
Lord Howarth of Newport (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 September 2011
Reference
730 c811-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the noble Lord, Lord Butler of Brockwell. Your Lordships will not want to hear lengthy Second Reading speeches at this stage, but it needs to be understood that because this House and the other place have disagreed twice, the Government are obliged either to accept our...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 September 2011
Reference
730 c810-1
House
House of Lords

Will the noble Lord help me on this? Does he agree that this sunset clause is not just a sunset clause but also a sunrise clause, in the sense that the matter can be brought back in any subsequent Parliament, for the duration of that Parliament alone, so that effectively...

Member
Lord Marks of Henley-on-Thames (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 September 2011
Reference
730 c818
House
House of Lords

We lost!

Member
Lord Corbett of Castle Vale (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 September 2011
Reference
730 c819
House
House of Lords

My Lords, anyone who had never known any of the history of this, listening to the remarks of the noble Lord, Lord Bach, would probably be astounded to learn that the Labour Party supported the idea of fixed-term Parliaments in its manifesto, as far back as 1992—

Member
Lord Wallace of Tankerness (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 September 2011
Reference
730 c819
House
House of Lords

My Lords, how can it be a fixed-term Parliament unless Members were elected to it as a fixed-term Parliament? That is the point—

Member
Lord Alderdice (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 September 2011
Reference
730 c821
House
House of Lords

Is the Minister telling us that we do not scrutinise Bills before they come into operation? Is he suggesting that we have no pre-scrutiny now?

Member
Baroness Boothroyd (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 September 2011
Reference
730 c821
House
House of Lords