Skip to main content

1-20 of 115 results for subject:"Deepcut Barracks"

Subject X
Benton, Sean

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Benton, Sean (115)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

One year on from the publication of the Deepcut Review I am reporting on the progress that has been made in the provision of care for our young recruits and trainees. We remain indebted to the work undertaken by Nicholas Blake QC for his independent, objective and comprehensive analysis of...

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written statements
Date
28 March 2007
Reference
458 c91-5WS
House
House of Commons

My right honourable friend the Minister of State for the Armed Forces (Adam Ingram) has made the following Written Ministerial Statement. One year on from the publication of the Deepcut Review, I am reporting on the progress that has been made in the provision of care for our young recruits...

Member
Lord Drayson (Labour)
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Written statements
Date
28 March 2007
Reference
690 c131-5WS
House
House of Lords

Statement on the government response to the Deepcut review (Cm 6851).

Lead member
Adam Ingram
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
447 c637-53
House
House of Commons
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
Cm 6851
House
House of Commons

I hope I do not get the same admonition, Mr. Speaker. One of the aims that we seek to achieve with the new accommodation blocks is a better spirit of camaraderie. One of the failings of single living accommodation was that it allowed individuals, trained or untrained, to live in...

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
447 c649;447 c649-50
House
House of Commons

We must consider what benefits would flow from the proposal. Then there is the question of how many people would be required. Is there a benefit? Possibly. How many would need to be available to deliver it? The instructors are trained soldiers, as we know—

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
447 c649
House
House of Commons

That depends what happens in the other place. I am not the master of that. The fact that the Bill is to be amended means that it will have to come back. I will not go into parliamentary procedure, but I am sure the hon. Gentleman will find an opportunity...

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
447 c649
House
House of Commons

On the latter point, was the hon. Gentleman asking when or whether the Bill would come back to the House?

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
447 c649
House
House of Commons

I am sure the Minister will agree that we need fair, robust and disciplined training for our armed forces. When I went through basic training as a 16-year-old soldier, one thing that we had then which we do not have now to address the myriad problems that young people have...

Member
Mike Penning (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
447 c648-9
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman and I have worked closely on this matter, but a big gap has appeared, which I regret. Nicholas Blake did not make that point in his report and did not make it a condition, and only he can comment on whether he is satisfied or otherwise with...

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
447 c651
House
House of Commons

indicated dissent.

Member
Lembit Opik (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
447 c651
House
House of Commons

I am trying to interpret what the hon. Gentleman has said in the same way in which he interpreted what Mr. Blake has said. If he is saying that putting the complaint back to the chain of command somehow undermines the quality of the decision-making process, I disagree fundamentally, and...

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
447 c651
House
House of Commons

Following Deepcut and, perhaps more importantly, the growing separation between the military and the rest of society and the enormous operational commitment now undertaken by the armed forces, the challenge faced by the training establishment in producing the world-class soldiers referred to by my hon. Friend the Member for Woodspring...

Member
Crispin Blunt (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
447 c651-2
House
House of Commons

I want to preface my remarks to the hon. Member for Woodspring (Dr. Fox)— Forgive me, Mr. Speaker. I will speak to the hon. Member for Woodspring later. I have three quick questions— I have one quick question. I am heartened that the Minister has written to Surrey police, but...

Member
Meg Hillier (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
447 c650
House
House of Commons

I am sorry that my hon. Friend did not get the chance to put all her questions. I am also sorry to hear her comments about Surrey police and suggest that she take up the matter with the relevant Minister. It is a matter of regret that the families have...

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
447 c650
House
House of Commons

Nicholas Blake clearly stated that if the Government refuse to establish an independent commissioner of military complaints, then he would call for a full, independent public inquiry into the Deepcut deaths. Is it not obvious that the Government have refused that specific recommendation and that years of co-operation and patience...

Member
Lembit Opik (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
447 c650-1
House
House of Commons

The introduction of the service complaints commissioner provides a new process by which people can make complaints, but it is a formal process which some recruits might find intimidating. Does the Minister agree that the Army chaplaincy plays a valuable role as regards complaints within the armed services? Is he...

Member
Mark Pritchard (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
447 c652
House
House of Commons

I agree with what the hon. Gentleman says. Others should listen to the way in which the argument was presented. If the process that we are considering has to be triggered, that almost constitutes a failure because it means that all the other duty of care mechanisms that we have...

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
447 c652-3
House
House of Commons

If I did not know that before, I certainly know it now, not only because of what the hon. Gentleman has said but because of the learning process that I have had to go through over the past five years in dealing with this issue. That is why more resources...

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
447 c652
House
House of Commons

On 29 March I announced to the House the publication of the Government-commissioned Deepcut review, undertaken independently by Nicholas Blake QC. It looked into the circumstances surrounding the deaths of four young soldiers who were training at Princess Royal barracks, Deepcut, between 1995 and 2002. I gave the House an...

Member
Adam Ingram (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 June 2006
Reference
447 c637-40
House
House of Commons