Skip to main content

1-20 of 1,372 results for subject:Treasury

Subject X
Northern Rock

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Northern Rock (1,372)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Date
13 February 2020
Reference
CP 221
House
House of Lords; House of Commons
Laid by
Jane Ellison
Department
Treasury
Type
Select Committee reports (Government responses); Command papers
Date
6 February 2017
Reference
Cm. 9413
House
House of Lords; House of Commons
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Committee of Public Accounts
Notes
Report has title: Sale of Northern Rock assets
Date
2 November 2016
Reference
HC 632 2016-17
House
House of Commons
Laid by
Clerk of the House
Department
National Audit Office
Type
House of Commons papers
Date
18 July 2016
Reference
HC 513 2016-17
House
House of Lords; House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers
Notes
The National Audit Office's assessment of HM Treasury's buy-back of subordinated debt.The buy-back by taxpayer-owned banks, Northern Rock (Asset Management) and Bradford & Bingley, of ÂŁ2.4 billion of their subordinated debt over the course of 2010 saved the taxpayer an estimated ÂŁ1.5 billion at present value. Subordinated debt is debt that ranks after other loans in terms of pay-out in the event of liquidation.
Date
16 March 2011
Reference
HC 706 2010-11
House
House of Commons
Type
House of Commons papers; Select Committee oral evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Committee of Public Accounts
Date
30 March 2009
Reference
HC 394-i 2008-09
House
House of Commons

Indeed; my right hon. Friend makes an important point. The scale of the financial intervention that could be authorised by the Bill is much greater than many people anticipated, even six months ago. It is important to make sure that there is proper scrutiny of it. I will not trespass...

Member
Mark Hoban (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2009
Reference
487 c1262;487 c1260
House
House of Commons

Will the Minister tell the House how much money we are talking about for this year and next, under this money resolution and the subsequent resolutions?

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2009
Reference
487 c1273;487 c1271
House
House of Commons

We have explained this, in our previous statements to the House on bank recapitalisation, and in our announcements on the asset purchase scheme. We also explained in detail the fact that we were providing ÂŁ10 billion in contingent liabilities for supporting the working capital scheme, which will allow ÂŁ20 billion...

Member
Ian Pearson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2009
Reference
487 c1273;487 c1271
House
House of Commons

Unfortunately, I do not agree with hon. Gentleman. Exceptional events have been taking place in money markets worldwide, and the Government have had to act quickly to ensure financial stability. We did that through recapitalisation, and the authorisation for that was in the money resolution that we passed in October....

Member
Ian Pearson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2009
Reference
487 c1279-80;487 c1277-8
House
House of Commons

I shall discuss those points, but basically the answer is that we have the balance right in what we are proposing today. The right hon. Gentleman will remember that there were concerns about this precise issue when the news about Northern Rock first broke. There were concerns that the provision...

Member
Ian Pearson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2009
Reference
487 c1278;487 c1276
House
House of Commons

Before addressing the amendments made in the other place in detail and the amendment the Government are now proposing, it might help if I were to summarise the purpose and history of clauses 228 and 229 in the latest print of the Bill. Their purpose is to put the use...

Member
Ian Pearson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2009
Reference
487 c1277-8;487 c1275-6
House
House of Commons

If we approve the Bill as it stands, is there a danger that because there will no longer be a weekly report from the Bank of England, some of this assistance could be provided on the Bank of England's balance sheet to avoid all scrutiny and accountability?

Member
Lord Redwood (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2009
Reference
487 c1278;487 c1276
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That this House disagrees with Lords amendment 83.

Member
Ian Pearson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2009
Reference
487 c1277;487 c1275
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend makes an important point. There is great outrage about bonuses being paid by banks, and it is felt that we should do more about that, given the amount of money being put into the banking system. The key is transparency. While I understand the thrust of the...

Member
Derek Twigg (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2009
Reference
487 c1280;487 c1278
House
House of Commons

I agree strongly: it is right that we should be as transparent as we reasonably can, while recognising that certain public policy objectives require some degree of confidentiality. The last thing that we would want to do is create a run on a financial institution by being too transparent and...

Member
Ian Pearson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2009
Reference
487 c1280;487 c1278
House
House of Commons

I remember the debates in Committee over this point. One of the dangers of not having transparency is that someone might invest in an organisation, only to lose a lot of money later because it went down, and they would not have known that the Government had been bailing it...

Member
Peter Bone (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2009
Reference
487 c1280;487 c1278
House
House of Commons

I cannot speak for the business managers of the House, obviously. However, as part of the normal reporting procedures there will be an opportunity to debate these matters. The hon. Gentleman has raised his point and he will have ample opportunities to raise the Government's programmes in debates on the...

Member
Ian Pearson (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2009
Reference
487 c1280;487 c1278
House
House of Commons

May I put three examples to my hon. Friend? Let us say that the Bank of England were to start buying Government debt; that the Treasury were to start issuing debt directly to businesses, institutions or arms of local government; or that the Government were to decide that they had...

Member
Jim Cousins (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2009
Reference
487 c1280-1;487 c1278-9
House
House of Commons

Yes, that would be helpful. However, I am conscious of the need to protect individuals or organisations that may receive assistance. There is a balance to be struck. I am worried that the Government's alternative to the Lords amendment does not do what the Lords amendment provides for: allowing Parliament...

Member
Stewart Hosie (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
10 February 2009
Reference
487 c1291;487 c1289
House
House of Commons