Skip to main content

1-20 of 290 results for subject:Nutrition

Subject X
Ofsted

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Ofsted (290)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Will the Minister confirm that the department will continue to keep in operation the minimum design standards that operate at present?

Member
Lord Howarth of Newport (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2010
Reference
719 c1642
House
House of Lords

185: Schedule 2, page 16, line 37, leave out from "section" to end of line 39 and insert "337(b) (special schools not maintained by local authorities) after "approved under section 342" insert "or is an Academy"." Amendment 185 agreed. Amendment 185A Moved by

Member
Lord Hill of Oareford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2010
Reference
719 c1643
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I know that the noble Lord, Lord Phillips, will probably have something to say on this. The noble Lord, Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts and I had several happy hours in the Chamber discussing community interest companies and how they should be formed. The noble Lord is correct—it...

Member
Baroness Thornton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2010
Reference
719 c1636
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am glad to have the opportunity to agree with my noble friend Lord Phillips but, as has already been pointed out by my noble friend Lord Hodgson, the CICs—a word I have learnt tonight—are not charities so, from a practical point of view, I am advised that...

Member
Lord Hill of Oareford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2010
Reference
719 c1637
House
House of Lords

I do not like being known as a man who complicates things, but I shall just say that I, unusually, do not support the noble Lord in his amendment. The fact that a CIC cannot be a charity is a fundamental impediment. It would also mean that it could not...

Member
Lord Phillips of Sudbury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2010
Reference
719 c1636
House
House of Lords

My Lords, may I make a point to the Minister? I am concerned about the timing of this Bill because the issues raised tonight are extremely complex. We are due to have Report stage within a week and, knowing that the machinery for getting approval for amendments in government does...

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2010
Reference
719 c1637
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the coalition agreement pledges to review the Freedom of Information Act with a view to increasing its scope. This, the first legislative act of the coalition, seeks to reduce its scope. It should not.

Member
Lord Lucas (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2010
Reference
719 c1637
House
House of Lords

168: After Clause 8, insert the following new Clause— "Academy proprietors: freedom of information In Schedule 1 (public authorities) to the Freedom of Information Act 2000, after Part IV insert— "Part IVA Academies 56A A qualifying Academy proprietor, within the meaning of section 8(2) of the Academies Act 2010, when...

Member
Lord Lucas (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2010
Reference
719 c1637
House
House of Lords

My Lords, that is very cheering news at this time of night, I shall go straight off and have a whisky to celebrate. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 168 withdrawn. Amendments 169 and 170 not moved. Clause 9 agreed. Amendment 170A not moved. Schedule 1 : Academies:...

Member
Lord Lucas (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2010
Reference
719 c1638
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in Amendment 168 my noble friend proposes inserting a new clause that would amend the Freedom of Information Act 2000 to add academy proprietors to the list of public bodies covered by that Act. Having thought about this, and having come newly into the department, I think that...

Member
Lord Hill of Oareford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2010
Reference
719 c1637-8
House
House of Lords

I do not want to disagree with the noble Baroness, as I agree with the substantive points that she makes in relation to her amendment, but I want to respond to her comments. First, we will wait for Report to hear the Government’s response to the point about consultation, but...

Member
Lord Hunt of Kings Heath (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2010
Reference
719 c1606-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, perhaps I may add one small thought to the debate. As I understand it, the parent governor will be not elected but appointed by the board of trustees for the academy. I think that that is a retrograde step. It is important that we have parent governors but...

Member
Baroness Sharp of Guildford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2010
Reference
719 c1604-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I agree with everyone who has spoken about the importance of parents being involved in schools’ governing bodies. I completely accept that the Government’s position that there should be at least one parent governor will not be acceptable to the noble Baroness, Lady Howe. However, I start by...

Member
Lord Hill of Oareford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2010
Reference
719 c1605-6
House
House of Lords

Before the noble Baroness does so, perhaps I could say a word about my amendment in the group. I was a little surprised to hear the noble Lord, Lord Hunt, backing these amendments, given that it was the Labour Government who reduced the number of parent governors to one, to...

Member
Baroness Walmsley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2010
Reference
719 c1606
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we have had one or two little forays about governors and governing bodies in Committee. I have to admit that I am surprised at how small a role governors appear to play in the Bill. I reaffirm my position as president of the National Governors Association in moving...

Member
Baroness Howe of Idlicote (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2010
Reference
719 c1601-2
House
House of Lords

78: Clause 1, page 2, line 15, at end insert— "( ) At least 25% of the people on the governing body of an Academy will be elected from among the parents of pupils at the school."

Member
Baroness Howe of Idlicote (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2010
Reference
719 c1601
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will intervene briefly, partly because I was the Minister who introduced the Taylor report, which laid down a requirement that school governors should include representatives of the staff, of the non-teaching staff, of parents and representatives of the local authority, roughly in the order of a quarter...

Member
Baroness Williams of Crosby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2010
Reference
719 c1603-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have Amendment 82 in this group. I agree with what the noble Baroness, Lady Howe of Idlicote, said about the importance of parent governors. My amendment differs from hers only in that I have specified a range of numbers of parent governors, including a minimum, rather than...

Member
Baroness Walmsley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2010
Reference
719 c1602-3
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for his reply and the noble Lord, Lord Hunt, for his support. I am not aware of any evidence that the existing academies feed their children any worse than other schools. I am not suggesting at all that that happens. I am reassured by the Minister...

Member
Baroness Walmsley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2010
Reference
719 c1600-1
House
House of Lords

Can the Minister explain how this will be monitored? He said that, if it is a low-incidence special educational need, the YPLA will be responsible for paying an extra premium in respect of that need. However, the YPLA is a payment agency, not an inspection agency. How will it monitor...

Member
Baroness Sharp of Guildford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
28 June 2010
Reference
719 c1584
House
House of Lords