Skip to main content

1-20 of 180 results for subject:Monarchy

Subject X
Prime Minister

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Prime Minister (180)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

A briefing paper on the office and functions of the Prime Minister

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
21 July 2026
Reference
CBP-9880

Since the 19th century there have been statutory restrictions on members of the Catholic and Jewish faiths making – and advising the Crown on – appointments in the Church of England. This includes the Prime Minister and Lord Chancellor, who advise the Monarch on bishops and other offices in the...

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
20 July 2026
Reference
CBP-10924

A briefing on how a new government is formed under a combination of the royal prerogative (non-statutory powers) and statute (Acts of Parliament).

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
13 July 2026
Reference
CBP-10959

A briefing on what happens when a Prime Minister formally resigns and the King appoints a successor, based upon prime ministerial memoirs and other sources.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
22 June 2026
Reference
CBP-10840

My Lords, I rise to support the amendment tabled by the noble Earl, Lord Devon, which is very creative and imaginative. For anybody who thinks this is beside the point, I certainly would not want to press the issue too hard—it is somewhat absurd to suggest that the removal of...

Member
Lord Moore of Etchingham (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc56-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have bitten my tongue for the first two or three groups our Committee has considered, but I feel obliged to make a quick comment on the amendment tabled by the noble Earl, Lord Devon—and also because my gluteus maximus has gone to sleep.

We have a constitution, which...

Member
Viscount Thurso (Liberal Democrat; Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc57-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise briefly to say that, as the royal representatives and great offices of state—the Lord Great Chamberlain and the Earl Marshall—are being removed from the House, is it reasonable not to sever the Royal Family’s link entirely with the Floor of the House? I might draw the...

Member
Lord Northbrook (Other (affiliation); Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c58
House
House of Lords

I think the noble Lord is speaking to the amendment in the next group. While I am on my feet, I will say very quickly, because this has made me think of it, that if the King does get removed, we will end up with something very close to the...

Member
Earl of Erroll (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c58
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will just make a couple of points. First, we are not abolishing hereditary Peers; we are abolishing the right of hereditary Peers to sit and vote in the House of Lords. Secondly, 26 years ago we removed 667 hereditary Peers and as far as I can judge,...

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c58
House
House of Lords

With that in mind, I invite the noble Lord to have a word with those who drafted the Labour manifesto, which says, as a standalone sentence: “Hereditary peers remain indefensible”.

Member
Lord Swire (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c58
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I associate myself with the comments of both the noble Lord, Lord Brennan, and my noble friend Lord Thurso. There is not, and never has been, the sort of link between the hereditary Peers and the monarch that I suspect the noble Earl, Lord Devon, was suggesting. We...

Member
Lord Newby (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc58-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I say to the noble Lord, Lord Newby, that I seem to remember that in the House of Lords which, to its shame, agreed to the execution of the King, there were only about six Peers who still sat, because of the exigencies of the Civil War and...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc59-62
House
House of Lords

I am very sorry to disappoint the noble Lord, Lord True, because I am standing to speak to Amendment 3 rather than my noble friend the Leader of the House. I thank the noble Earl for his amendment and also for his transparency in explaining that this is indeed a...

Member
Lord Hermer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc62-3
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the Minister for giving way. The noble Lord, Lord Grocott, made the point that the monarchy had certainly survived the departure of 600-plus hereditary Peers in 1998-99, but does the Minister accept that we are now breaking the link between hereditary Peers in Parliament in its...

Member
Lord Hamilton of Epsom (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c63
House
House of Lords

Yes, I do—that is the intention of the Bill. My point is that it does not impact at all the principle of our constitutional monarchy. It has no bearing on it whatever, and it is for those reasons that I respectfully ask the noble Earl to consider withdrawing his amendment.

Member
Lord Hermer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c63
House
House of Lords

Before the noble and learned Lord sits down, my recollection of 1999 was that the royal Princes specifically indicated that they would not wish to sit in this House. My further recollection is that, in the cloakroom, there were very grand coat hooks for the Prince of Wales and other...

Member
Lord Hardie (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c63
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble and learned Lord for the little bit of history—I am very grateful.

Member
Lord Hermer (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c63
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister very much for his words and particularly for being so brief, because I did not mean for this amendment to try your Lordships’ patience. I am very grateful to all who contributed to the debate. It is an amendment that deserved to stand alone, and I...

Member
Earl of Devon (Crossbench; Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc63-4
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Strathclyde

4: Clause 1, page 1, line 1, at end insert—

“(A1) In section 1 of the House of Lords Act 1999 (exclusion of hereditary peers), at end insert “, except for the Earl Marshal and the Lord Great Chamberlain”.”

Member’s explanatory statement

This amendment would retain the Earl Marshal and the...

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 c64
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 4 is a short amendment with a very small impact on two Members of this House. It is less a probing amendment and more one that I very much hope the Front Bench will be able to accept. The Leader of the House, at Second Reading and...

Member
Lord Strathclyde (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 March 2025
Reference
844 cc64-5
House
House of Lords