Skip to main content

1-20 of 265 results for subject:Beer

Subject X
Revenue and Customs

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Revenue and Customs (265)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Thank you, Dame Rosie, for the opportunity to respond on behalf of the Opposition. I wish to speak in support of the new clauses in my name and the name of my hon. Friend the Member for Erith and Thamesmead (Abena Oppong-Asare).

In this debate, we get the chance to discuss...

Member
James Murray (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
19 April 2023
Reference
731 cc290-2
House
House of Commons

Committee stage. Clause 1, discussed with amendments, new clauses 1, 2, 4, 5 and 6, and clauses 2 to 26. Clauses 1 to 26 agreed to, with clause 9 agreed to as amended. Bill, as amended, reported. Report stage. Agreed to on question. Third reading. Agreed to on question. Bill...

Lead member
Christopher Pincher
Answering member
Mike Amesbury
Department
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Debates on bills; Committee of the Whole House (HC)
Date
29 June 2020
Reference
678 cc95-111
House
House of Commons

I beg to move amendment 2, page 2, line 2, at end insert

“, and—

(c) to which a temporary traffic regulation order under section 14 of the Road Traffic Regulation Act 1984 is operative and will remain so for the time period of the pavement licence, and which has been made...

Member
Mike Amesbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2020
Reference
678 c95
House
House of Commons

The Government are asking Parliament to expedite the parliamentary progress of this Bill. In everyday circumstances, it would not be fast-tracked, but would be subject to a lower gear of progress. We are not in ordinary times or everyday circumstances, and the Opposition recognise, and have indeed constructively argued, that...

Member
Mike Amesbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2020
Reference
678 cc97-9
House
House of Commons

Diolch, Dame Eleanor, and thank you for calling me so early in the debate. I think this must be a first for a Plaid Cymru Member; it is certainly a first for me. It is a great pleasure to follow the shadow Minister, and that is not something that I...

Member
Ben Lake (Plaid Cymru)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2020
Reference
678 cc99-100
House
House of Commons

As the MP for a constituency that has a lot of small breweries, I have some sympathy with this. I would not want to see more off sales in my constituency, but does the hon. Member not think the root of the problem is that these small breweries did not...

Member
Meg Hillier (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2020
Reference
678 c100
House
House of Commons

The hon. Lady makes a good point. A lot of these issues would have been circumnavigated if small breweries had been entitled to some of the support measures that were made available to other businesses in the hospitality sector.

Member
Ben Lake (Plaid Cymru)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2020
Reference
678 c100
House
House of Commons

Not only do the breweries have an issue with how to sell their products; they also had a lot of their product in storage, which then went off and had to be disposed of in whatever way that is done. Does the hon. Gentleman agree that the breweries had a...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2020
Reference
678 c101
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman makes a very good point. It is particularly the smaller independent breweries, where storage is perhaps even more of an issue, that will have had to dispose of a lot of their stock at considerable cost. Then there is the relative uncertainty as to when they might...

Member
Ben Lake (Plaid Cymru)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2020
Reference
678 c101
House
House of Commons

I rise to discuss new clause 6, which stands in my name. The Bill has been very rushed. It was announced on Thursday in the business of the House. We had to lay amendments by Friday, and I thank you, Dame Eleanor, for allowing a manuscript amendment today in order...

Member
Meg Hillier (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2020
Reference
678 cc101-3
House
House of Commons

I shall speak to new clause 1, which I will not push to a Division because, for reasons mentioned by others—not least the hon. Member for Hackney South and Shoreditch (Meg Hillier)—I accept the premise of the Bill. It is about boosting the economy and creating flexibility so that people...

Member
Tim Farron (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2020
Reference
678 cc103-5
House
House of Commons

I thank everyone in the Chamber for the constructive discussion that we have had in Committee and on Second Reading. I want particularly to thank Opposition Front Benchers for the positive discussions we have had over the last several days to bring this Bill through all its stages today.

I also...

Member
Christopher Pincher (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2020
Reference
678 cc104-7
House
House of Commons

Just to pick up on new clause 4 and on the comments of my hon. Friend the Member for Hackney South and Shoreditch (Meg Hillier), while this from the Government is viewed as continuing into the future, the importance of the new clause is taking stock of the situation and...

Member
Matt Western (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2020
Reference
678 c107
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for that point. I will address it, if I may, when I come to new clause 6, which the hon. Member for Hackney South and Shoreditch (Meg Hillier) mentioned. To speak partly to his point, and in conclusion on this, the powers are...

Member
Christopher Pincher (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2020
Reference
678 cc107-9
House
House of Commons

My drafting may not have been perfect; the Bill has been very rushed, so it was difficult to get it right. Can the Minister give me any comfort that, in his mind or the Government’s, there is scope to allow a three-month review point on the licensing element so that...

Member
Meg Hillier (Labour; Co-operative Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2020
Reference
678 c109
House
House of Commons

I appreciate the hon. Lady’s concern and I understand why she raises those points. However, I simply reiterate that introducing a rolling review would kill certain aspects of the Bill and reduce the certainty and clarity that businesses and planners are looking for. It may also jeopardise the conclusion of...

Member
Christopher Pincher (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2020
Reference
678 c109
House
House of Commons

This has been a constructive debate, and I thank Members across the Chamber for their positive contributions and suggestions, which I hope will be taken up in the other place. I thank the Government, and I thank the Minister in particular for his positive engagement. We are happy to withdraw...

Member
Mike Amesbury (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 June 2020
Reference
678 cc109-110
House
House of Commons

I. Letter dated 09/05/2011 from David Gauke MP to Roger Gale MP and Jim Hood MP regarding Finance (No. 3) Bill: powers contained. Inc appendices. 124 p.

Deposited by
Treasury
Type
Deposited papers
Date
10 May 2011
Reference
DEP2011-0753
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is right to say that, under my proposal, people would go from paying no income tax at all to paying a marginal rate of 20p in one leap. However, he is wrong to say that the people who lost out as a result of the doubling of...

Member
Jeremy Browne (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2009
Reference
495 c881
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend is right to refer to pensioners such as himself. Male pensioners who retire at 65 get the allowance but women pensioners who retire at 60 do not. Does he agree that they have missed out?

Member
Sally Keeble (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 July 2009
Reference
495 c863
House
House of Commons