Skip to main content

1-20 of 129 results for member:"Lord Coaker"

Subject X
Building schools for the future programme

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Building schools for the future programme (129)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Talking of schools, on 2 September the Department for Education sneaked out the equalities impact assessment associated with the Building Schools for the Future decision. That assessment showed that the scrapping of that policy had a disproportionate impact on poorer children in our society. Can the Prime Minister explain what is progressive about that?
Asked by
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
15 September 2010
Reference
515 c879-80
House
House of Commons
Asked by
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Answering body
Prime Minister
Prime Minister's questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Notes
Lead question not printed
Date
15 September 2010
Reference
15267; 515 c879-80
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Education whether an estimate has been made of costs which will be incurred in the future by local authorities on Building Schools for the Future projects that will not now go ahead; what representations he has received from local authorities on the matter;...

Asked by
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Answering body
Department for Education
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 September 2010
Reference
8560; 515 c627W
House
House of Commons

On a point of order, Mr Evans. Is there any way of sending out a notice that would enable hon. Members to get right the name of my constituency, which is Gedling? Otherwise, as I keep saying, I am going to have to change my voice.

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2010
Reference
514 c656
House
House of Commons

I totally agree, and the hon. Gentleman makes his point very well. However, I am unclear about the legislative mechanism that we will use to try to stop bad situations arising. I cannot be sure what it will be without there being something either in the Bill or, perhaps, in...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2010
Reference
514 c630
House
House of Commons

I know. Perhaps it is the way I speak. Anyway, it is a delight to be back here. It does not seem long ago that we were finishing the debate last night—[Interruption.] No, it was not long ago. I am sure we have all had plenty of opportunity to enjoy...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2010
Reference
514 c595-6
House
House of Commons

I beg to move amendment 70, page 2, line 26, at end insert—

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2010
Reference
514 c595
House
House of Commons

Frankly, the reality is that it is not possible. What we are getting from the Secretary of State is an explanation for what he has done on the grounds that the money was not there in the budget for the Building Schools for the Future programme, when the letter from...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2010
Reference
514 c596
House
House of Commons

Not now! This is one of the good things about being in Committee—we can get excited and nobody really minds. The hon. Gentleman can oppose the Building Schools for the Future programme and say that what the Government have done over the past few years has been a waste of...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2010
Reference
514 c599-600
House
House of Commons

I shall give way first to my hon. Friend the Member for Swansea West (Geraint Davies).

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2010
Reference
514 c600
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman and I often agree on education matters, but on this particular matter I do not agree with him. He will know—not only from his experience in the House, but from his local authority experience, which he had on a local education authority, as he reminded us yesterday—that...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2010
Reference
514 c597-9
House
House of Commons

I have already answered the point about money for schools. I suggest that the hon. Gentleman goes round to the schools being built through PFI schemes and tells them, ““We don't want you in here building a school through PFI.”” The programmes delivered through PFI, through local authority funding or...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2010
Reference
514 c599
House
House of Commons

Oh, okay, that's fine—

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2010
Reference
514 c600
House
House of Commons

I was not trying to suggest that PFI was a panacea for all ills, and I know that it has sometimes led to problems. I was merely suggesting that it was one of the options that had allowed some local authorities to build new schools that might not have been...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2010
Reference
514 c601-2
House
House of Commons

That is certainly a possibility. If we change the regulations, anything is possible. The Minister will no doubt say that that will not happen, but the thrust of our argument is our desire to place certain statutory requirements in the Bill to protect the quality of educational provision, including the...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2010
Reference
514 c601
House
House of Commons

I apologise. I shall give way to my hon. Friend the Member for Swansea West.

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2010
Reference
514 c601
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is right to draw attention to the devastating impact of the cuts in the Building Schools for the Future programme on Liverpool, although, of course, it can be seen throughout the country. She is also right to draw attention to the comments of the deputy leader of...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2010
Reference
514 c603
House
House of Commons

That is exactly the point. If free schools are to be built, the money must be found somewhere, and the Government are struggling at the moment. They have raised £50 million by scrapping a few computer projects, which were described as low-capacity but would have been important to the people...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2010
Reference
514 c604
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend made a number of valuable contributions yesterday, and she is absolutely right to remind us of those facts. As I pointed out at the beginning of my speech, Building Schools for the Future was not just about school buildings; it was about transforming opportunities for young people....

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2010
Reference
514 c602-3
House
House of Commons

Thank you, Ms Primarolo. [Laughter.] The Government are seeking to save money by cutting the Building Schools for the Future programme, but they say that this expenditure is nothing to do with those cuts. They say that they are economising on low-priority IT projects. That will provide £50 million, and...

Member
Lord Coaker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
22 July 2010
Reference
514 c602
House
House of Commons