Skip to main content

1-20 of 188 results for subject:Speaker

Subject X
Access

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Access (188)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

If we decide to exclude at the point of charge, did my right hon. Friend’s Committee consider whether, instead of this entire procedure, a simple application by the House authorities to a magistrates court for conditions of bail would be more appropriate? That would cover not just this place, but...

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2024
Reference
750 c76
House
House of Commons

We did not consider that point, but we did look at the interaction with the judicial process and concerns about the possibility that a clever barrister might use the fact that a risk-based assessment had been made as some form of defence around fair trial. I am not saying that...

Member
Karen Bradley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2024
Reference
750 c76
House
House of Commons

Will my right hon. Friend explain what weight was given by her Committee to the fact that, unlike other people who work in Westminster, excluding a Member of Parliament is not just the exclusion of one individual, but the exclusion of the representation of 80,000 other individuals? That is a...

Member
Liam Fox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2024
Reference
750 c76
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend’s point relates to the proxy vote. The measures allow for a proxy vote, as I will come to in a moment.

Members of the Committee expressed different views but, on balance, we decided, as set out in our correspondence, that charge is the right point for exclusion;...

Member
Karen Bradley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2024
Reference
750 cc76-7
House
House of Commons

I apologise for intervening a second time, but I want to come back to the point made by my right hon. Friend the Member for North Somerset (Sir Liam Fox). He said, quite rightly, that constituents would be penalised by Members being excluded but one risk of providing a proxy...

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2024
Reference
750 c77
House
House of Commons

My right hon. Friend is right that excluding a representative’s voice from these Benches is a severe punishment for constituents.

I will make a final point in my role as chair of the British Group of the Inter-Parliamentary Union. BGIPU has agreed it will follow whatever is decided by this place...

Member
Karen Bradley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2024
Reference
750 c77
House
House of Commons

When the House initially debated the Commission’s proposals last summer, I challenged Members who like to refer to this place as the “mother of all parliaments” to make good on that epithet by ensuring that we lead by example and establish best practice. I repeat that call today. These reforms...

Member
Deidre Brock (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2024
Reference
750 cc77-8
House
House of Commons

For me, a lot of this spins on the formation and the training of the panel. One amendment to the motion said that it is anticipated that an MP and probably two Deputy Speakers would form the panel. What training would they need to be able to navigate such complex...

Member
Ben Spencer (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2024
Reference
750 c78
House
House of Commons

The motion mentions

“the assistance of the Counsel to the Speaker, the Director of Parliamentary Security and such other members of the House administration as it thinks fit.”

I believe that would be the case regardless of what we agree on today. As for the Speaker being involved, I am sure that...

Member
Deidre Brock (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2024
Reference
750 c79
House
House of Commons

I accept and believe that it is important that we have some means of protecting people in this House. This is something that we have been trying to do, and the introduction of the ICGS has helped in that process, making people confident that there is a route through which...

Member
Jacob Rees-Mogg (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2024
Reference
750 cc79-80
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the right hon. Gentleman for giving way. He is of course right about the constitutionality of this, but we all know that, in practical terms in recent times, things have been done differently and that people have been excluded by agreement however obtained from the Whips....

Member
Alistair Carmichael (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2024
Reference
750 c80
House
House of Commons

The right hon. Gentleman says that a Member agreeing not to come in is the same as banning a Member from coming in. That is clearly not true.

It would not take very long to turn this motion into legislation, and that would be the proper constitutional way of doing this.

The...

Member
Jacob Rees-Mogg (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2024
Reference
750 c80
House
House of Commons

Notwithstanding the right hon. Gentleman’s previous remark, I mostly agree with what he says. There is a problem here. When the Standards Committee reported on this, we made the point that exclusion is the very last thing that should be considered. In most cases, a Member in this kind of...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2024
Reference
750 c80
House
House of Commons

I entirely agree with the hon. Gentleman: any exclusion must be a decision of the whole House. That is our most ancient constitutional

right. The idea that it can be stopped by three people—even, Madam Deputy Speaker, one as distinguished as the Chairman of Ways and Means—is not in the...

Member
Jacob Rees-Mogg (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2024
Reference
750 c80
House
House of Commons

Is the substance of what my right hon. Friend says that if we enacted this procedure, it would be subject to challenge in the courts?

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2024
Reference
750 c81
House
House of Commons

I am saying that it would be ineffective because a right hon. or hon. Member would simply maintain the right to turn up. There would be no power to arrest that person when turning up, therefore what would we do next, and what would we do if a person so...

Member
Jacob Rees-Mogg (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2024
Reference
750 c81
House
House of Commons

I have immense respect for my right hon. Friend’s knowledge of constitutional matters. As an excellent former Leader of the House, why does he think that the Government have introduced an unconstitutional measure, rather than apply the due court process by having the House of Commons make the decision?

Member
Rehman Chishti (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2024
Reference
750 c81
House
House of Commons

It is because we have become confused about the limits of exclusive cognisance. The House has exclusive cognisance about its own affairs, but acting as the whole House. Look at the case of the exclusion of Bradlaugh. That was an action of the whole House. What did we do when...

Member
Jacob Rees-Mogg (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2024
Reference
750 cc81-2
House
House of Commons

It is strange to agree so much with the right hon. Member for North East Somerset (Sir Jacob Rees-Mogg). I think that he is a bit shocked that I agree with him as well—I see that he nods.

Let me return to two central things. First, this is about Parliament being...

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2024
Reference
750 cc82-3
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is making some interesting points. I have two concerns about the process. The first is about abiding by our long-standing rule of innocent until proven guilty. The second is that the people being penalised by this measure are our constituents, not us. Does he imagine guidelines for...

Member
David Davis (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 May 2024
Reference
750 c83
House
House of Commons