Skip to main content

1-20 of 591 results for subject:Dissolution

Subject X
Administration

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Administration (591)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

It is called proper scrutiny.

Member
Tristram Hunt (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2011
Reference
521 c718
House
House of Commons

I beg to move, That the clause be read a Second time.

Member
Jacob Rees-Mogg (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2011
Reference
521 c707
House
House of Commons

Does the hon. Gentleman imagine that the Government would be on such strong ground in trying to railroad things through without the support of both Houses if they had reformed the upper House before starting to tinker with this place?

Member
Angus Brendan MacNeil (Scottish National Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2011
Reference
521 c710
House
House of Commons

Did the hon. Gentleman hear the severe criticism expressed by the Deputy Prime Minister at Deputy Prime Minister's questions concerning the activities of the other House last night?

Member
Lord McCrea of Magherafelt and Cookstown (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2011
Reference
521 c709
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman is right to raise that issue. I did hear what the Deputy Prime Minister said about the upper House. Most unusually—because in the spirit of coalition I usually find that I hang on every word of the Deputy Prime Minister in almost entire agreement with it—I had...

Member
Jacob Rees-Mogg (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2011
Reference
521 c709-10
House
House of Commons

I have listened quite attentively to the hon. Gentleman's quite interesting opening remarks. Will he clarify something for me? If a party's manifesto—I appreciate that this is a bizarre concept for Liberal Democrats—contained a plan to reduce the length of a Parliament, should the House of Lords have the opportunity...

Member
Thomas Docherty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2011
Reference
521 c708
House
House of Commons

That is a very helpful intervention, and I thank the hon. Gentleman for it. I think the House of Lords would almost certainly follow the Salisbury convention in that respect, and it would be wrong of it to go against the clearly expressed will, in a manifesto, of the lower...

Member
Jacob Rees-Mogg (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2011
Reference
521 c708-9
House
House of Commons

May I begin by thanking the Minister for the enormous courtesy, good manners and good temper with which he has responded to the many criticisms of the Bill? I, among others, do not think it the best Bill ever to have come before Parliament, but he has invariably answered questions...

Member
Jacob Rees-Mogg (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2011
Reference
521 c707-8
House
House of Commons

It is a great delight to see the hon. Member for Carmarthen West and South Pembrokeshire (Simon Hart). It is always odd when constituencies contain bits of the west and bits of the south and bits of the north, all aligned with each other. May I just notify the hon....

Member
Chris Bryant (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2011
Reference
521 c782-3
House
House of Commons

Amendment 1 was tabled by the hon. Member for Nottingham North (Mr Allen), the Chairman of the Political and Constitutional Reform Committee, who apologises for not being here in person. I hope not to detain the House for too long. Amendment 1 is a probing amendment, which the Political and...

Member
Lord Hart of Tenby (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2011
Reference
521 c781-2
House
House of Commons

Is there not a danger that at times we in this place give the impression of having the clear thinking of the totally uninformed?

Member
Charles Walker (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2011
Reference
521 c760
House
House of Commons

I am extremely grateful to my hon. Friend for his intervention. Again he demonstrates why it is so important to maintain a thorough understanding of history if we are to understand exactly what our position in this place is in the context—

Member
Daniel Byles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2011
Reference
521 c760
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman for his intervention.

Member
Daniel Byles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2011
Reference
521 c760
House
House of Commons

It may interest the House to know that in the 1830s King William IV was going to come in person to prorogue Parliament, because that would bring all business to a stop and the Government did not like the business that was going on. I believe that, in the end,...

Member
Jacob Rees-Mogg (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2011
Reference
521 c760
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to you, Mr Deputy Speaker, and I apologise. [Interruption.]

Member
Daniel Byles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2011
Reference
521 c759
House
House of Commons

Thank you very much, Mr Deputy Speaker. I shall move on to new clause 4, which sets out new rules for the prorogation—I have as much trouble as the hon. Member for Rhondda (Chris Bryant) with that word—of Parliament and would repeal the Prorogation Act 1867, which provides the power...

Member
Daniel Byles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2011
Reference
521 c759-60
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman makes a perfectly sensible point, although I always caution hon. Members not to equate local elections in England to elections to the devolved Administrations. There is a substantive difference in the amount of spend that is allowed, and the Scottish, Welsh and Northern Ireland devolved elections use...

Member
Thomas Docherty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2011
Reference
521 c763
House
House of Commons

The Minister is a thoroughly reasonable individual and I am sure he will not hold that statement against the rest of Her Majesty's loyal Opposition when he considers accepting our amendments. As has been outlined previously—it would be inappropriate for me to go into great detail—we do not support the...

Member
Thomas Docherty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2011
Reference
521 c762-3
House
House of Commons

Does the hon. Gentleman accept that such anomalies already exist and have existed for a long time? In England it is common for local government elections to be held on the same day as a parliamentary election. In Bristol those local government elections follow an entirely different timetable from the...

Member
Stephen Williams (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2011
Reference
521 c763
House
House of Commons

I do not like to leave the House in suspense, but on this one occasion hon. Members will have to wait and see how many of our amendments the Government are prepared to accept. Clearly, if the Minister accepts all the considered amendments that we have offered, we would be...

Member
Thomas Docherty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 January 2011
Reference
521 c762
House
House of Commons