Skip to main content

1-20 of 963 results for subject:Intimidation

Subject X
Administration of justice

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Administration of justice (963)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Motion that this House has considered the identification and prosecution of reproductive coercion. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Natalie Fleet
Answering member
Alex Davies-Jones
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates
Date
24 March 2026
Reference
783 cc101-8WH
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House has considered the identification and prosecution of reproductive coercion.

We have all heard the narrative about the devious woman who gets pregnant to get what she wants: “She’s got pregnant to trap him. She’s after his money.” That was what I heard on loop from...

Member
Natalie Fleet (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2026
Reference
783 c96WH
House
House of Commons

We have all heard the narrative—the one where the devious woman gets pregnant to trap the man: “She’s only after his money. She just wants to trap him.” That was what I heard on loop when I was impregnated as a child. If anyone questioned why he, an older man...

Member
Natalie Fleet (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2026
Reference
783 cc96-102WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is telling an incredibly powerful story about reproductive coercion and, in particular, the role of family courts. Does she agree that this issue, this case and all the matters that it brings to light would be perfect for the review of family courts that Baroness Levitt has...

Member
Stella Creasy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2026
Reference
783 c102WH
House
House of Commons

Absolutely; I think that this is something that we need to shine a light on however we can. Far too many women are traumatised by family courts in this way—the situation is absolutely ripe for intervention.

Member
Natalie Fleet (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2026
Reference
783 c97WH
House
House of Commons

I commend the hon. Lady for bringing forward this issue. She has strength of character, strength of personality and commitment to these subjects; it is always a pleasure to come along and hear her express her viewpoint, and I congratulate her. Just to be helpful to her—I did speak to...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2026
Reference
783 c103WH
House
House of Commons

I absolutely agree; the hon. Member makes very good points that I did not know about. The more we can talk about this issue, the better, and making it a stand-alone offence is absolutely the right thing to do.

It is easy to dismiss Liv’s as a story of extreme wealth,...

Member
Natalie Fleet (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2026
Reference
783 cc103-5WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve with you in the Chair, Mr Dowd. I thank my hon. Friend the Member for Bolsover (Natalie Fleet) for bringing forward this really important debate. To echo the hon. Member for Strangford (Jim Shannon), she always uses her voice in this place to amplify...

Member
Alex Davies-Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2026
Reference
783 cc105-6WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for her positive response to the hon. Member for Bolsover (Natalie Fleet). The Minister obviously understands the issue very clearly. In my earlier intervention, I gave the example of Northern Ireland, where the sentence for coercive behaviour is 14 years. Over here on the mainland, in...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2026
Reference
783 c106WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for raising the distinction in the sentencing for this crime in Northern Ireland. In England and Wales, the sentence is a maximum of five years, but as I have said, the crime normally comes alongside other forms of abuse, for which the CPS will look...

Member
Alex Davies-Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2026
Reference
783 cc106-8WH
House
House of Commons

Over 10,000 women have signed a public letter to the Prime Minister asking him to take action against the escalating campaign of threats and intimidation against women who stand up for women’s rights. Many of these women are particularly concerned that the institutions supposed to protect them are failing to do so, including the criminal justice system. Will the Minister with responsibility for victims be good enough to meet me and representatives of those who organised the letter to discuss this important issue?

Asked by
Joanna Cherry (Scottish National Party)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Topical questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
12 September 2023
Reference
737 c766
House
House of Commons

I am always happy to meet the hon. and learned Lady.

Answered by
Edward Argar (Conservative)
Answering body
Ministry of Justice
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
12 September 2023
Reference
737 c767
House
House of Commons
Type
Public acts
Date
12 November 2009
Reference
CHAP 25 2009

The noble Lord cannot get away with that. He knows that it is more or less a nuclear option to vote down an order in this House. The convention is that we very rarely do. As the noble and learned Baroness said, the casinos order was exceptional. It is exceedingly...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
712 c964
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord is quite right—I was able to illustrate only one case from the recent past, and three from the records. However, that is in the minds of the Government when they create affirmative orders, especially controversial ones. That is why we go through a process of considerable consultation...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
712 c964
House
House of Lords

We will come back to this on Report. The Minister should appreciate that the identity of an informer has been kept secret for centuries, and still is. This provision has been introduced to deal with a very narrow area: murder or manslaughter caused with a firearm or knife by someone...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
712 c964
House
House of Lords

Amendment 183AA 183AA: After Clause 64, insert the following new Clause— "Review of investigation anonymity orders The Secretary of State must, no later than two years after the commencement of this Part, review the operation of investigation anonymity orders made under section 64, and lay a report of that review...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
712 c964
House
House of Lords

In moving this amendment, I wish to speak also to Amendments 183B and 183C in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Thomas of Gresford, and Amendment 184 in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Dubs. The new clause that I propose should be inserted after Clause 64 is...

Member
Lord Henley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
712 c965
House
House of Lords

I wish to speak to Amendments 183B and 183C. I do not pursue Amendment 183B but Amendment 183C would add something to the Bill. In order that the Committee can understand what it is about, let me explain that the application for an investigation anonymity order will be made to...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
712 c965-6
House
House of Lords

My name is attached to the amendment of the noble Lord, Lord Dubs, and he has set out the reasons for it. I add only this. Of course the Director of Public Prosecutions is able to delegate his responsibility, and in each large police station these days a CPS representative...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 July 2009
Reference
712 c967
House
House of Lords