Skip to main content

1-20 of 20 results for subject:Forgery

Subject X
Appeals

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Appeals (20)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Statement of Changes in Immigration Rules (HC 321 2007-08). Lords debate on a motion to disapprove. Motion withdrawn. (Agreed on deferred division in House of Commons 14 May 354 to 5)

Lead member
Lord Avebury
Answering member
Lord Bassam of Brighton
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates
Date
17 March 2008
Reference
700 c87-101
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to everyone who has taken part in this short debate; they have raised some important issues. I am particularly grateful to the noble Baroness, Lady Warwick, who gave me advance warning of a couple of specific issues that she wished to raise. I am conscious...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2008
Reference
700 c96-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I have already asked the Minister to point to the passage in the statement which states that an application will be considered within 28 days of the expiry of a previous leave to remain. Where does it say that?

Member
Lord Avebury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2008
Reference
700 c98
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I cannot give the precise reference this evening, but I shall ensure that the noble Lord has the references that work. The noble Baroness, Lady Hanham, repeated the point about consultation. It is worth making it clear that we said in our statement of intent on tier 1,...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2008
Reference
700 c98
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the administrative review is just a piece of paper in front of a judge; it is not a hearing in any sense. Is that right?

Member
Lord Roberts of Llandudno (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2008
Reference
700 c99
House
House of Lords

rose to move, That the Statement, laid before the House on 6 February, be disapproved. The noble Lord said: My Lords, we oppose this statement on a number of counts, but first and foremost because there has been no consultation with any of the stakeholders. The Immigration Law Practitioners' Association,...

Member
Lord Avebury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2008
Reference
700 c87-91
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I wish to speak briefly in this debate on the changes in the Immigration Rules. Statement HC321, which the noble Lord, Lord Avebury, wishes to disapprove, will introduce changes to the immigration rules that could cause problems for international students coming to higher education institutions in the UK....

Member
Baroness Warwick of Undercliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2008
Reference
700 c91-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, when we were considering the UK Borders Bill, the measures to introduce the new points-based system must have been considered reasonably uncontroversial as they were left to be introduced on a negative procedure, which would have happened today had the noble Lord, Lord Avebury, not drawn attention to...

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2008
Reference
700 c92-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Baroness, Lady Warwick, mentioned concessions, but we cannot find such concessions in the order itself. Possibly the Minister can tell us exactly what these concessions are and how he is going to deal with them. Is there a concession regarding transitional arrangements, especially under paragraph 47,...

Member
Lord Roberts of Llandudno (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2008
Reference
700 c94-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is an administrative review carried out by officers who consider the cases. It is not a judicial process, though, as I have made clear to the noble Lord, if there is a disagreement over the effect of the review, there is a possibility of a judicial review....

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2008
Reference
700 c99-100
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I asked whether the appeal system would be included in the regulations. I do not think that the Minister answered that point.

Member
Baroness Hanham (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2008
Reference
700 c100
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thought that I had covered appeals fairly thoroughly. However, I shall reflect further on the noble Baroness’s comments and provide her with more background.

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2008
Reference
700 c100
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for the very welcome concession that he made at the beginning of his speech but express the reservation that it was not done in another way; that is, by withdrawing the order and then bringing back an alternative set of amendments to the Immigration...

Member
Lord Avebury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 March 2008
Reference
700 c100-1
House
House of Lords

Eleventh Sitting (Morning). Clause 19 agreed to. Clause 20 under consideration when the Committee adjourned till this day at Two o'clock.

Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Date
15 March 2007
Reference
PBC
House
House of Commons

What response they have made to the report of the Independent Monitor on Entry Clearance of November 2005, published in July 2006; whether they will retain appeal rights for persons refused under the new points system until the success rate on appeals falls below 10 per cent; whether changes have...

Asked by
Lord Avebury (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
9 October 2006
Reference
7267; 685 c54-5WA
House
House of Lords

Immigration Asylum and Nationality Bill. Committee stage seventh sitting (morning). Schedule 3, as amended, agreed to. Clauses 47 to 49 agreed to, clause 48 as amended. New clause 1 under consideration.

Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Date
27 October 2005
Reference
SCE
House
House of Commons

Immigration and Asylum Bill. Lords committee stage fourth day. Clauses 92 to 158 agreed to, clauses 92,96,99,101,105 to 107,109,111,113,115,132,134,136,146,154 to 156 as amended. Schedules 9 to 15 agreed to, schedules 9,13,15 as amended. New clauses considered. Bill reported with amendments. (HL Bill 91 1998/99).

Department
Home Office
Type
Committee of the Whole House (HL); Debates on bills
Date
28 July 1999
Reference
604 c1531-98,1613-68
House
House of Lords

Immigration and Asylum Bill. Special standing committee. Committee stage twenty-second sitting (morning). Clause 104 agreed to as amended. Clauses 105 to 110 agreed to. Clause 111 agreed to as amended. Clauses 112 and 113 agreed to. Clause 114 under consideration.

Lead member
Mike O'Brien
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Date
13 May 1999
Reference
SSC
House
House of Commons

Immigration and Asylum Bill. Special standing committee. Committee stage fourteenth sitting (morning).Clauses 25 to 29 agreed to as amended. Schedule 1 agreed to as amended. Clause 30, as amended, under consideration.

Lead member
Mike O'Brien
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Date
27 April 1999
Reference
SSC
House
House of Commons

Immigration and Asylum Bill. Special standing committee. Committee stage thirteenth sitting (afternoon) (part II). Clauses 23 and 24 as amended agreed to. Clause 25 under consideration.

Lead member
Mike O'Brien
Department
Home Office
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Date
22 April 1999
Reference
SSC
House
House of Commons