Skip to main content

1-20 of 32 results for member:"Lord Hannay of Chiswick"

Subject X
Arms trade

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Arms trade (32)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Lords, I declare an interest as back in the mists of time, when this report, so excellently introduced by my noble friend Lord Ricketts, was published, I was a member of the European Affairs Committee. On this occasion, the delay inadvertently makes the report even more topical, as the...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
21 November 2024
Reference
841 cc350-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister will remember that, at an early stage in the crisis, the UN Security Council called on the Houthis to desist. What consideration are the Government giving to further action at the United Nations? Are they, for example, seeking to put together a majority in the UN...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 February 2024
Reference
836 c1156
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I should at the outset make it clear that I welcome the agreement by the US and the UK to make naval nuclear propulsion

information available to Australia, one of our oldest and most valuable allies. A step such as this, which will substantially enhance the deterrent capacity...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
17 January 2022
Reference
817 cc160-2GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I personally went through two traumatising experiences of genocide in the 1990s when I was Britain’s representative on the UN Security Council: Rwanda in 1994 and Srebrenica in 1995. That is why I strongly support and welcome my noble friend Lord Alton’s debate today. If proof was needed...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 May 2021
Reference
812 c174GC
House
House of Lords
Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
30 January 2020
Reference
801 c1563
House
House of Lords

My Lords, what is happening in north-east Syria is a tragedy for many thousands of individuals, most of them ethnic Kurds who were our allies quite recently in fighting IS. That is not in doubt. Were it to lead to IS terrorists escaping from confinement, it would adversely affect our...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 October 2019
Reference
800 cc718-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does the Minister agree that his statement about arms exports sounds awfully like weasel words? How on earth do you define which arms might be used in a major military operation such as this? Could he therefore say how the position we are taking compares with the position...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 October 2019
Reference
800 c26
House
House of Lords

Can the Minister now answer the question I asked the other day on the Statement—namely, whether this suspension, while the legal processes work out, covers repeat deliveries under contracts? Does he not agree that the Appeal Court has done us all a great favour by drawing to the attention of the Emirates and Saudi Arabians the real risks that they have been breaching international humanitarian law?

Asked by
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
25 June 2019
Reference
798 c1010
House
House of Lords

My Lords, can the Minister be a little clearer about the impact of the Government’s decision not to enter into new contracts while the court case continues? Can he say whether that means that they will not make deliveries under existing contracts while the case is pending? That is rather...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 June 2019
Reference
798 c898
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I follow a number of other members of the committee in thanking our chair, the noble Lord, Lord Howell of Guildford, for his very crisp and clear introduction of our report. I echo much of what the noble Baroness, Lady Anelay, has said, and I am delighted also...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 April 2019
Reference
797 cc45-7
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it is high time this House had the opportunity to debate the dramatically appalling situation in Yemen. For that opportunity, I thank my noble friend Lord Luce.

The UK may not be directly a party to the conflict there but we are very much involved—as a supporter of Saudi...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 November 2018
Reference
793 cc2069-2071
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does the noble Baroness not recognise that there was an extraordinary divergence between the NATO

communiqué, from which the Statement is heavily drawn and which said all the right things about increased spending and taking a robust attitude towards Russia, and what the President of the United States...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 July 2018
Reference
792 c1090
House
House of Lords

Perhaps the Minister could reply to two questions on Yemen. First, what is the duration of the lifting of the blockade on humanitarian supplies by Saudi Arabia—which was very welcome when it came—and do we believe that the humanitarian supplies are really getting through now and that the blockade is...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
7 March 2018
Reference
789 c1173
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am sure that the noble Lord is aware that, even at the height of the tension between the international community and Iraq, food and medicine were never cut off. Surely this point should be made forcefully to the Saudi Government. It is no good saying that they...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
20 November 2017
Reference
787 c50
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I suspect that it was clear to all of us on the International Relations Committee that we were going to need a strong injection of humility as we embarked on an analysis of a Middle East in chaos, confusion and rapid movement. If we demonstrated that humility in...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2017
Reference
783 cc807-9
House
House of Lords

I wonder whether the noble Lord would be so kind as to address one element which came up in innumerable contributions today and which is absolutely central to our report. I refer to the rivalry between Saudi Arabia and Iran. He has said not a single thing about our policy...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 July 2017
Reference
783 c849
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the opportunity to debate events in the Middle East could not be more timely or more necessary. I fear that this will not be the last occasion on which those words or their equivalents

will be uttered, given the near certainty that we face a long period of...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 July 2013
Reference
746 cc1016-9
House
House of Lords

To ask Her Majesty's Government what arrangements they are making for the signature, ratification and implementation of the new United Nations Arms Trade Treaty.

Asked by
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
21 May 2013
Reference
745 cc733-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I trust that it will be in order to ask that congratulations be passed to Alistair Burt and his team at the Foreign and Commonwealth Office for their skill and perseverance in achieving a more robust treaty than might at one time have been anticipated, and to the Foreign Secretaries, from Jack Straw onwards, who gave them their full support. Can the Minister say who is going to sign on behalf of the UK on 3 June? It is surely important that the signature be at a level that indicates the importance that we attach to it. Can she also say what consideration will be given in future, when granting an arms export licence, to the status of the importing country under the arms trade treaty—whether it has signed and ratified and is implementing the treaty? Would not that be a more effective way of encouraging the widest possible acceptance of its terms?

Asked by
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
21 May 2013
Reference
745 c733
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does the Minister recognise—and I am not asking what our negotiating position is—that between now and Friday

it is highly likely that we will have to make a choice between a robust treaty, which is not signed by everyone, and a weak treaty, which will not be worth...

Member
Lord Hannay of Chiswick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 July 2012
Reference
739 c603
House
House of Lords