Skip to main content

1-20 of 2,108 results for subject:Devolution

Subject X
Candidates

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Candidates (2,108)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Lords committee stage seventh day. Clause 57 agreed to. Schedule 26 agreed to. Clauses 58 and 59 agreed to. Schedule 27, as amended, agreed to. Clauses 60 and 61 agreed to. Schedule 28 agreed to. Clauses 62 and 63 agreed to. New clause under consideration.

Lead member
Lord Wilson of Sedgefield; Baroness Taylor of Stevenage
Answering member
Baroness Scott of Bybrook; Lord Jamieson
Department
Ministry of Housing, Communities and Local Government
Type
Committee proceedings; Debates on bills
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 cc298-195GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise to oppose Clause 57 and Schedule 26 and express my deep concern about the way in which the Government are pushing through local government reorganisation under the banner of devolution. Local government reorganisation is not new. It can and does happen but, where it does, it...

Member
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 cc298-122GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my Amendment 196EC to Schedule 26 fairly sets out some of my concerns, which, having listened to the noble Baroness, I am sure are shared by others in the Room. I tabled it in part to probe how Ministers will determine the new pattern of unitary councils. I...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 cc122-300GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I add my voice in support of the noble Lord, Lord Bassam. Everything he said makes a great deal of sense. It is hugely important to consider the identity of the authorities being created in terms of their communities and place-making. I am also tempted to support the...

Member
Viscount Trenchard (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 cc124-5GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, uncharacteristically, I support the noble Baroness, Lady Bennett, and the noble Lord, Lord Bassam.

Clause 57 and Schedule 26 should play no part in the Bill because the claim that larger units of local government are more cost-effective has been thoroughly debunked. We will just end up with larger,...

Member
Lord Fuller (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 cc125-6GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I feel bound to remind the noble Lord, Lord Fuller, that the Bill is a Labour continuation of a local government reorganisation started under the Conservatives. This is very much the Michael Gove—now the noble Lord, Lord Gove—view of how England should be governed, with mayors as the...

Member
Lord Wallace of Saltaire (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 cc126-7GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, size really does matter. Big is not necessarily beautiful. I am a practitioner, as many know, looking up the telescope from place-making projects we are working on across the country, I declare my interest as such. I am a voice, I suppose, from the charitable and voluntary sector...

Member
Lord Mawson (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 c301GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank all those who have spoken, in particular my noble friend Lord Wallace of Saltaire, who made a number of important points about all three of the suggestions before us. I thought the point from the noble Lord, Lord Mawson, was extremely well made: this is about...

Member
Lord Shipley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 cc301-128GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I will be brief in closing, but very clear about the position of the Official Opposition on this group. After many hours of debate, one point should now be beyond doubt: devolution cannot be delivered by compulsion. If the Government persist in reserving sweeping powers to direct and...

Member
Baroness Scott of Bybrook (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 cc128-302GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Bennett of Manor Castle, and my noble friend Lord Bassam of Brighton for addressing the local government reorganisation measures in the Bill. I thank the noble Baroness, Lady Jones, for speaking on behalf of the noble Baroness, Lady Bennett.

The noble Baroness, Lady...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 cc302-131GC
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for her answer. I know she has huge experience of local democracy and councils, but there is quite a lot of experience in this Room as well. If noble Lords from the Conservative Party are agreeing with the noble Lord over there, I think there might...

Member
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 c131GC
House
House of Lords

Tabled by

Lord Bassam of Brighton

196EC: Schedule 26, page 275, line 31, at end insert—

“(3A) Before issuing an invitation or direction the Secretary of State must consider—

(a) the natural geography of the proposed local areas being merged,

(b) the identity of the authorities in terms of communities and place making,

(c) the balance...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 c131GC
House
House of Lords

I thank my noble friend for her response to my amendment. It is worth the Government thinking a bit more about whether it would be appropriate to put in the Bill something that reflects the guidance. I am grateful to all noble Lords who supported what I said. If we...

Member
Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 c132GC
House
House of Lords

I am putting the proposition that Clause 59 and Schedule 27 should not stand part of the Bill. I was very grateful to my noble friend and her colleagues last September for the modest amendments they moved to what was then Clause 57 in the Commons —Amendments 152 and 153....

Member
Lord Blunkett (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 c124GC
House
House of Lords

I very much support the noble Lord, Lord Blunkett, in opposing Clause 59. As an opponent of centralised control of all sorts, I feel that, if we are talking about democracy, it really ought to mean what it says. Centralised control of any sort is, for me, not democracy.

Member
Baroness Jones of Moulsecoomb (Green Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 c124GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I apologise that I was not able to speak at Second Reading but I want to speak to the proposition from the noble Lord, Lord Blunkett, to abolish Clause 59 and Schedule 27. I do this as someone who has lived in Sheffield and who still represents the...

Member
Lord Mohammed of Tinsley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 cc125-134GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank my noble friend Lord Mohammed of Tinsley for speaking. I also thank the noble Lord, Lord Blunkett, in particular. I strongly support the stand part notices on Clause 59 and Schedule 27. The reason has been explained. This is a devolution Bill about community empowerment, but...

Member
Lord Shipley (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 cc134-127GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I wish to continue what seems to be an emerging consensus and a Sheffield love-in. The noble Lord, Lord Blunkett, was the leader in Sheffield when I was at Sheffield University and I will always be grateful for the 10p bus rides that I was able to take.

As...

Member
Lord Jamieson (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 cc127-8GC
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank my noble friend Lord Blunkett and the other noble Lords who have contributed to this debate. I turn first to my noble friend’s intention to oppose the clause and Schedule 27 standing part of the Bill.

This clause and the related schedule will bring further consistency to...

Member
Baroness Taylor of Stevenage (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 cc135-6GC
House
House of Lords

I thank my noble friend for that response. I shall of course not press my amendment at this stage. I cannot promise the Liberal Democrats what I shall do when we reach Report, not least since—as I said in a meeting a couple of days ago—I am a critical friend...

Member
Lord Blunkett (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 February 2026
Reference
853 cc136-1GC
House
House of Lords