Skip to main content

1-20 of 2,081 results for subject:Dissolution

Subject X
Censure motions

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Censure motions (2,081)
More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

There will be a Westminster Hall debate on 2 March 2026 on an e-petition calling for members of the public to be given the right to vote no confidence in the government. The debate will be opened by John Lamont MP. The Petitions Committee agreed to the debate in response...

Type
Commons Debate packs
Date
23 February 2026
Reference
CDP-2026-0038

A debate has been scheduled in Westminster Hall at 4.30pm on Monday 17 October on e-petition 619781, calling for an early general election. The subject for the debate has been nominated by the Petitions Committee.

Type
Commons Debate packs
Date
17 October 2022
Reference
CDP-2022-0167

My Lords, I rise to speak only briefly. This short debate shows how, although we have five groups of amendments, they are all quite interdependent: they are all involved with the same issue. The noble Lord, Lord Norton of Louth, has done us a service tonight. He has indicated what...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c186
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this has been a long and really interesting discussion, and it sums up the very reason for this amendment. When I spoke on the amendment from the noble Lord, Lord Norton, at the beginning, I said that one of the reasons I thought he had brought his amendment...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc207-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in this debate I find myself in the unusual position of agreeing with almost every speaker—agreeing with something they said and disagreeing with something they said.

I start with the point made by my noble friend Lord Stansgate. If the Bill is merely returning to the status quo ante,...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc230-1
House
House of Lords

I am sorry to interrupt the Minister, and I am grateful for the detail that he is going into. I am not a lawyer, but I am not the only person in your Lordships’ House tonight who is not. Can the Minister say, in lay man’s language, what he understands...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c234
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I suspect that those words are sufficient for lawyers, but I think the Minister’s understanding of this might be as great as mine at the moment, so I will perhaps take advice between now and Report so that I fully understand the implications of what he saying—because I...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c234
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise briefly, if only to remind your Lordships’ House that the Labour Chief Whip, the noble Lord, Lord Kennedy, and I were not able to vote in 1974, but that is probably not a good reason for rising to the Dispatch Box at this time of night.

I...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c246
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I think that we have had a slightly longer and more interesting discussion on this than we anticipated at the start. The noble Lord, Lord Wallace, made a very valid point, not least because we have spoken a lot tonight about the normal conventions and practices of parliamentary...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c251
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I very much support Clause 1 being part of the Bill, but I want briefly to record how big a decision this is. Just 11 years after the Fixed-term Parliaments Act 2011 was put on to the statute book, with much criticism and objection to it at the...

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c180
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Evelyn Waugh once said that the problem with the Tory party is that it

“never put the clock back by a single second.”

Is it not rather wonderful that it is now putting the clock back by 11 whole years?

Member
Lord Lexden (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c180
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Norton of Louth

1: Clause 2, page 1, line 6, after “Her Majesty’s” insert “personal”

Member
Lord Norton of Louth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c180
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Government have a manifesto commitment to get rid of the Fixed-term Parliaments Act. The Opposition also have a manifesto commitment to repeal it. This Bill repeals the Act and seeks, as we have just heard, to restore the status quo ante. Like my later amendments, Amendment 1...

Member
Lord Norton of Louth (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc181-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the House is indebted to the noble Lord for elucidating this issue and tabling the amendment. In the Joint Committee, it was worrying that the Government did not initially seem to understand the distinction between requesting a Dissolution and advising a Dissolution, advice that would be binding on...

Member
Lord Beith (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc182-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I agree with much of what the noble Lord, Lord Beith, said and with the amendment tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Norton. I am not sure it is hugely important but, because the issue of “advice” as opposed to “request” has reared its head as early as...

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 cc183-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we are very much indebted to the noble Lord for his background in this matter. It is important to remember that there are Dissolution principles to be settled before this situation arises. From time to time they have been revised, but I do not think they have been...

Member
Lord Mackay of Clashfern (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c184
House
House of Lords

My Lords, if I may intervene in this debate, I think it is still important that what used to be the custom and convention be clarified on paper. This is for a very simple reason. While I agree with the noble Lord, Lord Grocott, that it is inconceivable

that a...

Member
Lord Desai (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c184
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I agree with all those who have said that my noble friend Lord Norton of Louth has done us a very considerable service. He reminded us of the formidable words of Alan Lascelles, private secretary to George VI in 1950. We should, at all times, keep those Lascelles...

Member
Lord Lexden (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c185
House
House of Lords

May I just ask, what would be an improper dissolution?

Member
Lord Grocott (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c185
House
House of Lords

I do not think I could make a list of the possibilities. One can conceive of them, but we trust to the existence of this power and the wisdom of the monarch to ensure that no improper dissolution is likely ever to be brought forward.

Member
Lord Lexden (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
25 January 2022
Reference
818 c185
House
House of Lords