Skip to main content

1-20 of 728 results for subject:Injunctions

Subject X
Children

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Children (728)
More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Letter dated 19/12/2018 from Baroness Manzoor to Lord Paddick regarding issues raised during the debate on the Anti-social Behaviour, Crime and Policing Act 2014 (Amendment) Order 2018: the effectiveness of civil injunctions. 2p.

Deposited by
Whips Office (Lords)
Type
Deposited papers
Date
19 December 2018
Reference
DEP2018-1289
House
House of Lords

Clauses 15 to 25 agreed to. Clause 15 discussed with new clause 7 (On-demand programme services: requirement to prevent persons under the age of 18 accessing pornographic material with an 18 classification certificate), new clause 8 (Duty to provide a service that excludes adult-only content) and new clause 11 (Power...

Lead member
Matt Hancock
Answering member
Louise Haigh
Department
Department for Culture, Media and Sport
Type
Debates on bills; Public Bill Committee proceedings
Committee
Digital Economy Bill Committee
Date
20 October 2016
House
House of Commons
Type
Public acts
Date
26 March 2015
Reference
CHAP 20 2015; 2015 c. 20

I beg to move, That this House agrees with Lords amendments 1 to 68, 138 and 168.

Member
Norman Baker (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
4 February 2014
Reference
575 c183
House
House of Commons

My Lords, I will speak also to the other amendments in my name in this group. Amendments 12 and 13 to Schedule 2, and Amendments 34 and 35 to Clause 37, seek to remove imprisonment as a sanction for children breaching their IPNAs or failing to comply with police dispersal...

Member
Earl of Listowel (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
8 January 2014
Reference
750 cc1553-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, first, I welcome the fact that we are having this debate, because the injunctions were clearly the major issue raised at Second Reading. I think that most noble Lords who contributed to that debate raised this issue.

However, I start by saying that the late scheduling of today’s Committee...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 November 2013
Reference
749 cc736-7
House
House of Lords

We want the Government to justify their position. As I said at the beginning, I think it appropriate for young people to be held responsible for their actions, but I want to probe why the Government think that this kind of injunction is appropriate. The anti-social behaviour order, as we...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 November 2013
Reference
749 c737
House
House of Lords

I am sorry to intervene on the noble Lord, but I asked a question about Article 3 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child and the comment made by the Joint Committee on Human Rights that this Bill has no requirement to consider a child’s best interests,...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 November 2013
Reference
749 c740
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this has been an interesting debate. All speakers have sought to be helpful to the Minister, perhaps seeking to protect the Government from themselves by this amendment—they were certainly not trying to be a nuisance or annoyance in identifying so many difficult issues that arise here. So I...

Member
Baroness Smith of Basildon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 November 2013
Reference
749 cc756-8
House
House of Lords

Moved by

Lord Greaves

19A: Clause 1, page 1, line 5, leave out “10” and insert “12”

Member
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 November 2013
Reference
749 c731
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 19A stands on its own. I should first apologise to the House for not being present for Second Reading. As this is the first time that I have taken part in this Bill I should, in line with the Code of Conduct, declare various interests that I...

Member
Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 November 2013
Reference
749 cc731-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, my noble friend has rightly referred to the series of actions that the Government are proposing in the new regime. Like him, I welcome the fact that the new injunctions will not be criminal. I think he said that this distinction in the eyes of young people may...

Member
Baroness Hamwee (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 November 2013
Reference
749 c733
House
House of Lords

My Lords, 10 days ago, a number of us debated in this House the Second Reading of the Age of Criminal Responsibility Bill, introduced by the noble Lord, Lord Dholakia. I commend some of the things that were said then about the ability of children of the age of 10...

Member
Lord Ramsbotham (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 November 2013
Reference
749 cc734-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, perhaps I might follow my noble friend Lord Ramsbotham on an issue which I raised at Second Reading: the position of the court granting an order. I raised the question of whether there was anything in the Bill that provided for rules to be made requiring the court...

Member
Lord Hope of Craighead (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 November 2013
Reference
749 c735
House
House of Lords

My Lords, is not part of the problem that the Government are trying to sweep away a whole range of different responses to

anti-social behaviour and replace them with what is essentially a single measure, at least as far as the individual is concerned, and that therefore there is no...

Member
Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 November 2013
Reference
749 cc735-6
House
House of Lords

Perhaps the noble Baroness can help the House. Section 1 of the Crime and Disorder Act 1998, passed by the previous Government, permitted local authorities to apply for ASBOs in respect of persons aged 10 or over, subject to conditions. Does the party opposite have a changed view now, in...

Member
Lord Faulks (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 November 2013
Reference
749 c737
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to my noble friend Lord Greaves for tabling this amendment, because it does seem to be a good place to start. The issue has certainly triggered a lot of arguments from colleagues, if I may say so. We have set this age of 10 because...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 November 2013
Reference
749 cc737-9
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the Minister for giving way. Will he give us some examples of when he thinks it will be appropriate to use the injunction route for a child of 10 or 11? What does he envisage as the penalties in the event of breach?

Member
Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 November 2013
Reference
749 c739
House
House of Lords

That follows on from where I was in my argument. The engagement of youth offender teams is key to this issue. They welcome the opportunity of intervening earlier—pre-offending, one might say—because one of the deficiencies of the current system is that the remedy lies in an anti-social behaviour order, which...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 November 2013
Reference
749 c739
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Lord for attempting to answer the point. The amendment deals specifically with young people. Before we come to Report, could the noble Lord write to me and other noble Lords setting out, in more detail, his thinking

on the circumstances which will lead to...

Member
Lord Harris of Haringey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
18 November 2013
Reference
749 c739
House
House of Lords