Skip to main content

1-20 of 203 results for subject:Intimidation

Subject X
Children

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Children (203)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Clauses 8 to 20 discussed with Schedule 3 and amendments and new clauses. Clause 8 agreed to. Clause 9, amendment 68 withdrawn. Clauses 9 to 12 agreed to. Clause 13, amendment 70 withdrawn. Clauses 13 to 16 agreed to. Clause 17, amendment 14 negatived on division (3 to 9). Clauses...

Lead member
Sarah Sackman
Answering member
Kieran Mullan
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Public Bill Committee proceedings; Debates on bills
Committee
Courts and Tribunals Bill Committee
Date
23 April 2026
House
House of Commons

Motion that this House has considered the identification and prosecution of reproductive coercion. Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Natalie Fleet
Answering member
Alex Davies-Jones
Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates
Date
24 March 2026
Reference
783 cc101-8WH
House
House of Commons

I beg to move,

That this House has considered the identification and prosecution of reproductive coercion.

We have all heard the narrative about the devious woman who gets pregnant to get what she wants: “She’s got pregnant to trap him. She’s after his money.” That was what I heard on loop from...

Member
Natalie Fleet (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2026
Reference
783 c96WH
House
House of Commons

We have all heard the narrative—the one where the devious woman gets pregnant to trap the man: “She’s only after his money. She just wants to trap him.” That was what I heard on loop when I was impregnated as a child. If anyone questioned why he, an older man...

Member
Natalie Fleet (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2026
Reference
783 cc96-102WH
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is telling an incredibly powerful story about reproductive coercion and, in particular, the role of family courts. Does she agree that this issue, this case and all the matters that it brings to light would be perfect for the review of family courts that Baroness Levitt has...

Member
Stella Creasy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2026
Reference
783 c102WH
House
House of Commons

Absolutely; I think that this is something that we need to shine a light on however we can. Far too many women are traumatised by family courts in this way—the situation is absolutely ripe for intervention.

Member
Natalie Fleet (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2026
Reference
783 c97WH
House
House of Commons

I commend the hon. Lady for bringing forward this issue. She has strength of character, strength of personality and commitment to these subjects; it is always a pleasure to come along and hear her express her viewpoint, and I congratulate her. Just to be helpful to her—I did speak to...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2026
Reference
783 c103WH
House
House of Commons

I absolutely agree; the hon. Member makes very good points that I did not know about. The more we can talk about this issue, the better, and making it a stand-alone offence is absolutely the right thing to do.

It is easy to dismiss Liv’s as a story of extreme wealth,...

Member
Natalie Fleet (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2026
Reference
783 cc103-5WH
House
House of Commons

It is a pleasure to serve with you in the Chair, Mr Dowd. I thank my hon. Friend the Member for Bolsover (Natalie Fleet) for bringing forward this really important debate. To echo the hon. Member for Strangford (Jim Shannon), she always uses her voice in this place to amplify...

Member
Alex Davies-Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2026
Reference
783 cc105-6WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for her positive response to the hon. Member for Bolsover (Natalie Fleet). The Minister obviously understands the issue very clearly. In my earlier intervention, I gave the example of Northern Ireland, where the sentence for coercive behaviour is 14 years. Over here on the mainland, in...

Member
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2026
Reference
783 c106WH
House
House of Commons

I thank the hon. Gentleman for raising the distinction in the sentencing for this crime in Northern Ireland. In England and Wales, the sentence is a maximum of five years, but as I have said, the crime normally comes alongside other forms of abuse, for which the CPS will look...

Member
Alex Davies-Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
24 March 2026
Reference
783 cc106-8WH
House
House of Commons

Clauses 32 to 34 agreed to. Schedule 5 agreed to. Clause 35 agreed to. Clauses 36 and 37 agreed to, as amended. Clauses 38 to 40 agreed to. Schedule 6 agreed to. Clause 41 agreed to, as amended. Committee adjourned.

Lead member
Diana Johnson; Jess Phillips
Answering member
Harriet Cross
Department
Home Office
Type
Public Bill Committee proceedings; Debates on bills
Committee
Crime and Policing Bill Committee
Date
8 April 2025
House
House of Commons

I. The economic and social costs of domestic abuse. Research report 107. 77p. Draft Domestic Abuse Bill: II. Delegated powers memorandum. 22p. III. European Convention on Human Rights memorandum. 23p. IV. Impact assessment. 44p.

Deposited by
Home Office
Type
Impact assessments; Deposited papers
Date
21 January 2019
Reference
DEP2019-0071
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

What steps he plans to take to protect child witnesses in sex abuse and other cases from intimidation during cross-examination.

Asked by
David Mowat (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Oral questions - Lead
Status
Answered
Date
15 October 2015
Reference
901580; 600 cc471-2
House
House of Commons

The defence case has to be put to all prosecution witnesses, but in order to ensure effective cross-examination, a mandatory advocacy course for all defence advocates is being developed and will include the cross-examination of vulnerable witnesses. Pre-recorded cross-examination has already been piloted successfully, and we are committed to a national roll-out.

Answered by
Robert Buckland (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 October 2015
Reference
600 c471
House
House of Commons

In 2011, at Stafford Crown court, a victim of child abuse was cross-examined in a vicious and intimidatory way for 12 days by a team of seven barristers, during a session in which the judge was generally thought to have lost control of the courtroom. Such cross-examination is a massive disincentive for others to come forward. Four years later, may I ask what steps have been taken to prevent it from happening again?

Asked by
David Mowat (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
15 October 2015
Reference
600 c471
House
House of Commons

I well remember that case. The good news is that in the retrial matters were handled very differently, and the outcome was successful. However, intimidatory cross-examination should not happen. Judges have a duty to ensure that young witnesses are not cross-examined inappropriately. As I have said, a new advocacy course is being developed to ensure that that sort of abuse does not happen again.

Answered by
Robert Buckland (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 October 2015
Reference
600 c471
House
House of Commons

Will the Solicitor General tell us what the CPS is doing to help vulnerable witnesses, such as victims of human trafficking, to give evidence in courts?

Asked by
Mark Menzies (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Oral questions - 1st Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
15 October 2015
Reference
600 c472
House
House of Commons

Recently, the CPS drew up new guidelines for the care of witnesses in court. Those guidelines are currently being piloted and will be rolled out nationally in the new year. They will go a long way towards supporting witnesses, while avoiding the dangers of coaching witnesses in the giving of evidence, which, of course, would not be desirable.

Answered by
Robert Buckland (Conservative)
Answering body
Attorney General
Type
Oral answers to questions
Date
15 October 2015
Reference
600 c472
House
House of Commons

In the last few years, it has become clear that a great many young people have been sexually abused over a number of years and are traumatised by that abuse. Can the Solicitor General assure the House that the necessary resources are available so that the young people in all those cases can be looked after?

Asked by
Jim Shannon (Democratic Unionist Party)
Answering body
Attorney General
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
15 October 2015
Reference
600 c472
House
House of Commons