Skip to main content

1-20 of 221 results for subject:Parcels

Subject X
Competition

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Competition (221)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask the Secretary of State for Business and Trade, what assessment she has made of the adequacy of competition in the parcels market.

Asked by
Derek Thomas (Conservative)
Answering body
Department for Business and Trade
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
26 April 2023
Reference
182040
House
House of Commons

This note gives an overview of postal services in the UK. It discusses current regulation, market trends and consumer problems.

Type
Commons Briefing papers
Date
11 May 2022
Reference
SN06763

My Lords, I shall speak also to Amendment 31. Amendment 25 implements a recommendation made by your Lordships’ Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee in its report on the Bill. The Government have also accepted the second and final recommendation by the committee, and we will come to that in...

Member
Earl Attlee (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2011
Reference
726 c1803
House
House of Lords

25A: Clause 60, page 37, line 21, leave out ““may”” and insert ““must””

Member
Lord Christopher (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2011
Reference
726 c1804
House
House of Lords

The Minister made reference to the liabilities. Could he say a word about the inherited assets?

Member
Lord Morris of Handsworth (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2011
Reference
726 c1738
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we have had two very interesting contributions—I am tempted to call them Second Reading speeches, but perhaps that is unkind or does not fully take into account where the argument has reached. They have been an overall look at where we are. We should remember, first, that the...

Member
Viscount Eccles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2011
Reference
726 c1753-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 24PB, which stands in my name and that of my noble friend Lord Brooke of Alverthorpe, would insert a new clause related to the indebtedness of a potential universal service provider. In following the Bill’s progress, it has become clear to me that we have a willing...

Member
Baroness Dean of Thornton-le-Fylde (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2011
Reference
726 c1756-8
House
House of Lords

On reflection, I am happy to do that and shall conclude my comments at this point.

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2011
Reference
726 c1749
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord, Lord Young of Norwood Green, has said that this is a very large group of amendments. I considered whether it might be possible to disaggregate some of them and came to the conclusion that, as they all broadly address the same subject—access to the network—it...

Member
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2011
Reference
726 c1749-53
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I share the concerns of the noble Baroness, Lady Dean of Thornton-le-Fylde. Overgearing is as bad for companies as it is for Governments, and it is something we need to be aware of as we move towards selling Royal Mail. I would favour an initial public offering, but...

Member
Baroness Wheatcroft (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2011
Reference
726 c1758-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I hesitate to rise on this occasion because there have been so many detailed, coherent and powerful speeches, but perhaps I may make two brief comments. I would ask the Minister, as he looks at the potential amendments to Clause 28, to recognise that it is an extraordinarily...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2011
Reference
726 c1759
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this important amendment seeks to reassert that the universal service should be maintained as a benefit to the whole country even though this may involve some cost. The amendment aims to remove the new criteria that Clause 28(3) seeks to introduce. These criteria direct Ofcom to have regard...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2011
Reference
726 c1745-9
House
House of Lords

In the interests of time, it may be better for the noble Lord to wait until I explain what it is about.

Member
Viscount Eccles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2011
Reference
726 c1749
House
House of Lords

24GB: Clause 24, page 13, line 17, at end insert— ““( ) Any order under this Part may provide for it (or any of its provisions) to come into force on a specified day. ( ) A ““specified day”” means a day specified in an order made by the Secretary...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2011
Reference
726 c1745
House
House of Lords

24GC: Clause 28, page 15, line 14, leave out subsection (3)

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2011
Reference
726 c1745
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I hope that I may respond to some of the points made in the debate, particularly to the comments made by the Minister. Before I deal specifically with my own Amendment 24EB, I wish to comment on Amendment 24EC, which was spoken to by my noble friend Lord...

Member
Baroness Drake (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2011
Reference
726 c1741-3
House
House of Lords

Before the noble Baroness withdraws her amendment, I am happy to provide some clarification on the points she raised. She asked about the Secretary of State being obliged to consult, and I mentioned Clause 17. I apologise if I was not clear enough. The Government’s position is that under the...

Member
Lord De Mauley (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2011
Reference
726 c1743
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for those further clarifications. They are helpful, although they trigger one or two queries. Any further clarity that can be provided in writing would certainly be helpful. I interpreted what the Minister said as the Government putting on record that if they seek to exercise their...

Member
Baroness Drake (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2011
Reference
726 c1743-4
House
House of Lords

24EC: Clause 17, page 10, line 9, at end insert— ““( ) Before making an order under this section, the Secretary of State must consult the trustees of the RMPP.””

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2011
Reference
726 c1744
House
House of Lords

I, too, welcome the clarification. We will study the words closely. I concur with the points made by my noble friend Lady Drake. We reserve the right to return to these issues on Report, given their importance. Amendment 24EC not moved. Clause 17 agreed. Clause 18 : Amendments of the...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
6 April 2011
Reference
726 c1744
House
House of Lords