Skip to main content

1-20 of 929 results for subject:Vetting

Subject X
Conflict of interests

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Conflict of interests (929)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

To ask His Majesty's Government, further to the Written Answer by Baroness Anderson of Stoke-on-Trent on 13 July (HL1390), why Cabinet Office staff who had worked on the Mandelson due diligence were not recused from working on the Government response to the Humble Address of 4 February, due to having...

Asked by
Baroness Finn (Conservative)
Answering body
Cabinet Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Tabled
Date
16 July 2026
Reference
HL2194
House
House of Lords

Statement to update the House of the Government's response to the Humble Address of 4 February 2026.

Lead member
Darren Jones
Department
Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster
Type
Ministerial statements
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
784 cc587-599
House
House of Commons

Given the upcoming Prorogation and state opening of Parliament, I thought it would be helpful to return to the House to provide an update on the progress the Government have made to respond to the Humble Address of 4 February as quickly and thoroughly as possible.

As Members will know, the...

Member
Darren Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
784 cc587-8
House
House of Commons

I thank the Chief Secretary to the Prime Minister for advance sight of his statement and for taking this statement himself; it is good of him not to delegate. This was not his mess—that was the 2024 Budget—but I am afraid it is now his mess to clear up.

I have...

Member
Alex Burghart (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
784 cc588-9
House
House of Commons

The hon. Gentleman asked me a number of questions, which I will take in turn. To the question of where the documents are, those in scope of the Humble Address are currently in one of three locations: first, with the Government waiting for the publication of the second tranche; secondly,...

Member
Darren Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
784 cc589-590
House
House of Commons

The whole House came together around the Humble Address on the basis that Parliament had found its way forward to deal with the evidence around the appointment of Peter Mandelson. Will my right hon. Friend guarantee the House that no documents are being withheld? Around the time that it was...

Member
Clive Efford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
784 c590
House
House of Commons

As has been alluded to at the Dispatch Box, there were documents that the Humble Address warranted to be published as part of that process. The Cabinet Office was very clear about that. It took some time to get access to some of those documents, specifically in relation to UKSV...

Member
Darren Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
784 c590
House
House of Commons

I thank the Chief Secretary for advance sight of his statement. The women and girls who spoke out against Jeffrey Epstein and those connected to him did so at enormous personal cost. We must never lose sight of the fact that their bravery is the reason we are having this...

Member
Lisa Smart (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
784 cc590-1
House
House of Commons

It is not for the Chief Secretary to the Prime Minister to speak about whipping arrangements at the Dispatch Box. I will leave that to the Chief Whip and the usual channels. The hon. Lady asked me two questions about reform to the other place, in particular the removal of...

Member
Darren Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
784 c591
House
House of Commons

The pain of the Epstein victims sits heavy with all of us in this House because we expect the highest standards of all of us. The challenge with this incident is that it involves a convoluted process that raises difficult questions about Government vetting and appointments. Given that, can my...

Member
Stella Creasy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
784 c591
House
House of Commons

My hon. Friend is exactly right to raise that question. The terms of reference have been confirmed with Adrian Fulford. That work has been started, and I expect it to complete in three to four weeks’ time.

Member
Darren Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
784 c591
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for his kind words about the hard work of the Intelligence and Security Committee. He will recognise and want to reflect with the House that we cannot work any faster than the speed at which the documents are given to us by the Government; the last...

Member
Jeremy Wright (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
784 cc591-2
House
House of Commons

I thank the right hon. and learned Gentleman for his question and confirm that the Government share the view that it is not the fault of the Intelligence and Security Committee that documents are not yet ready to be published; we hope that they will be ready shortly after the...

Member
Darren Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
784 c592
House
House of Commons

Forgive me, Madam Deputy Speaker. It was about whether the Minister would confirm that it will be the ISC that determines redactions on the basis of international relations and national security.

Member
Jeremy Wright (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
784 c592
House
House of Commons

I can confirm that the Government’s agreed process with the Committee stands.

Member
Darren Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
784 c592
House
House of Commons

I thank the Chief Secretary for his statement. I am interested in the costs. We know about the £75,000 payout, and obviously a police inquiry is incredibly costly. There are the costs to his Department in complying with the Humble Address. Will he publish the costs? Will he also publish...

Member
Rachael Maskell (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
784 c592
House
House of Commons

My best answer is to refer my hon. Friend to the contracts finder tool, which publishes all public procurement contracts and their value. In relation to questions of the internal cost of processing the Humble Address, I cannot commit to give a round number; essentially it involves lots of hours...

Member
Darren Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
784 c592
House
House of Commons

May I, through the right hon. Gentleman, thank the officials in the Cabinet Office who have assisted me in the work that I have been doing in this area as Chairman of the Public Administration and Constitutional Affairs Committee? He will know that not all Government communications are carried on...

Member
Simon Hoare (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
784 c593
House
House of Commons

The tranche of documents will be published in the normal way to ensure that parliamentary privilege is attached to those documents and any debate that we subsequently have in relation to them. The hon. Gentleman asked me questions about personal devices and personal communications channels, which we refer to as...

Member
Darren Jones (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
784 c593
House
House of Commons

Further to the security vetting issue in relation to Peter Mandelson, last week in the Chamber I asked questions—including to the Minister and through a point of order to the Speaker —three times, but I have not had an answer, so I would really appreciate an answer. At the point...

Member
Richard Burgon (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
27 April 2026
Reference
784 c593
House
House of Commons